Aortic dissection electrocardiogram: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m Bot: Adding CME Category::Cardiology |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
{{WH}} | |||
{{WS}} | |||
[[CME Category::Cardiology]] | |||
[[Category:Cardiology]] | [[Category:Cardiology]] | ||
Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
[[Category:Up-To-Date]] | [[Category:Up-To-Date]] | ||
[[Category:Up-To-Date cardiology]] | [[Category:Up-To-Date cardiology]] | ||
Revision as of 22:31, 14 March 2016
Aortic dissection Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Special Scenarios |
Case Studies |
|
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3]
Overview
ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) due to occlusion by the dissection of the coronary artery at its ostium may be present. The right coronary artery tends to be involved more frequently than the left coronary artery. Electrical alternans may be present in the setting of a pericardial effusion should the dissection have extended into the pericardium.
Electrocardiogram
EKG findings in aortic dissection are usually non-specific. Possible findings include:
- Sinus tachycardia
- Acute ST segment elevation may be seen in 1% - 2% of the patients, signifying the occurrence of STEMI due to involvement of coronary arteries by the dissection.
- In the setting of dissection involving the pericardium causing pericardial effusion, an electrical alterans may be present.
2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease (DO NOT EDIT)[1]
Screening Tests (DO NOT EDIT)[1]
Class I |
"1. An electrocardiogram should be obtained on all patients who present with symptoms that may represent acute thoracic aortic dissection." |
"a. Given the relative infrequency of dissection-related coronary artery occlusion, the presence of ST-segment elevation suggestive of myocardial infarction should be treated as a primary cardiac event without delay for definitive aortic imaging unless the patient is at high risk for aortic dissection. (Level of Evidence: B)" |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA; et al. (2010). "2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine". Circulation. 121 (13): e266–369. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d4739e. PMID 20233780. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help)