Cholangitis CT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*CT scans have a higher sensitivity (63%) and are accurate in localizing the site of obstruction.<ref name="TseBarkun2006">{{cite journal|last1=Tse|first1=Frances|last2=Barkun|first2=Jeffrey S.|last3=Romagnuolo|first3=Joseph|last4=Friedman|first4=Gad|last5=Bornstein|first5=Jeffrey D.|last6=Barkun|first6=Alan N.|title=Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction|journal=HPB|volume=8|issue=6|year=2006|pages=409–425|issn=1365182X|doi=10.1080/13651820600746867}}</ref> | *CT scans have a higher sensitivity (63%) and are accurate in localizing the site of obstruction.<ref name="TseBarkun2006">{{cite journal|last1=Tse|first1=Frances|last2=Barkun|first2=Jeffrey S.|last3=Romagnuolo|first3=Joseph|last4=Friedman|first4=Gad|last5=Bornstein|first5=Jeffrey D.|last6=Barkun|first6=Alan N.|title=Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction|journal=HPB|volume=8|issue=6|year=2006|pages=409–425|issn=1365182X|doi=10.1080/13651820600746867}}</ref> | ||
*The accuracy of conventional CT in determining the presence and level of obstruction is between 81–94%.<ref name="TseBarkun2006">{{cite journal|last1=Tse|first1=Frances|last2=Barkun|first2=Jeffrey S.|last3=Romagnuolo|first3=Joseph|last4=Friedman|first4=Gad|last5=Bornstein|first5=Jeffrey D.|last6=Barkun|first6=Alan N.|title=Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction|journal=HPB|volume=8|issue=6|year=2006|pages=409–425|issn=1365182X|doi=10.1080/13651820600746867}}</ref> | *The accuracy of conventional CT in determining the presence and level of obstruction is between 81–94%.<ref name="TseBarkun2006">{{cite journal|last1=Tse|first1=Frances|last2=Barkun|first2=Jeffrey S.|last3=Romagnuolo|first3=Joseph|last4=Friedman|first4=Gad|last5=Bornstein|first5=Jeffrey D.|last6=Barkun|first6=Alan N.|title=Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction|journal=HPB|volume=8|issue=6|year=2006|pages=409–425|issn=1365182X|doi=10.1080/13651820600746867}}</ref> | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Revision as of 19:07, 20 April 2016
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]
|
Cholangitis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Cholangitis CT On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cholangitis CT |
Overview
CT Scan
- Computed tomography (CT) without contrast injections are more sensitive than ultrasounds in demonstrating choledocholithiasis, the leading cause of acute cholangitis.[1]
- CT scans have a higher sensitivity (63%) and are accurate in localizing the site of obstruction.[2]
- The accuracy of conventional CT in determining the presence and level of obstruction is between 81–94%.[2]
Axial non-contrast of ascending cholangitis[3]
References
- ↑ Gallix BP, Aufort S, Pierredon MA, Garibaldi F, Bruel JM (2006). "[Acute cholangitis: imaging diagnosis and management]". J Radiol (in French). 87 (4 Pt 2): 430–40. PMID 16691174.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Tse, Frances; Barkun, Jeffrey S.; Romagnuolo, Joseph; Friedman, Gad; Bornstein, Jeffrey D.; Barkun, Alan N. (2006). "Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction". HPB. 8 (6): 409–425. doi:10.1080/13651820600746867. ISSN 1365-182X.
- ↑ Image courtesy of Dr. Henry Knipe. [1]