Cholangitis cost-effectiveness of therapy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Cholangitis}} | {{Cholangitis}} | ||
==Overview== | |||
The most cost-effective technique to diagnose cholangitis is an ultrasounds. | |||
==Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy== | |||
*An [[ultrasound]] scan is the most cost effective imaging for cholangitis. | |||
*Though [[computed topography]] (CT) scans and [[magnetic resonance imaging]] (MRI) scans can accurately identify masses and detect metastases, they are often more expensive than an ultrasound scan.<ref name="book123">{{Citation | |||
| last1 = Cameron | |||
| first1 = John L. | |||
| last2 = Cameron | |||
| first2 = Andrew M. | |||
| lastauthoramp = yes | |||
| title = Current Surgical Therapy: Expert Consult | |||
| publisher = Elsevier, Inc. | |||
| place = Philadelphia, PA | |||
| year = 2014 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} |
Revision as of 20:16, 29 April 2016
Cholangitis Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Cholangitis cost-effectiveness of therapy On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cholangitis cost-effectiveness of therapy |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Cholangitis cost-effectiveness of therapy |
Overview
The most cost-effective technique to diagnose cholangitis is an ultrasounds.
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
- An ultrasound scan is the most cost effective imaging for cholangitis.
- Though computed topography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can accurately identify masses and detect metastases, they are often more expensive than an ultrasound scan.[1]
References
- ↑ Cameron, John L. & Cameron, Andrew M. (2014), Current Surgical Therapy: Expert Consult, Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, Inc.