Cholangitis CT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==CT== | ==CT== | ||
*[[Computed tomography]] (CT) without contrast injections are more sensitive than [[ultrasounds]] in demonstrating [[choledocholithiasis]], a predominant cause of acute cholangitis.<ref name="pmid16691174">{{cite journal |vauthors=Gallix BP, Aufort S, Pierredon MA, Garibaldi F, Bruel JM |title=[Acute cholangitis: imaging diagnosis and management] |language=French |journal=J Radiol |volume=87 |issue=4 Pt 2 |pages=430–40 |year=2006 |pmid=16691174 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | *[[Computed tomography]] (CT) without contrast injections are more sensitive than [[ultrasounds]] in demonstrating [[choledocholithiasis]], a predominant cause of acute cholangitis.<ref name="pmid16691174">{{cite journal |vauthors=Gallix BP, Aufort S, Pierredon MA, Garibaldi F, Bruel JM |title=[Acute cholangitis: imaging diagnosis and management] |language=French |journal=J Radiol |volume=87 |issue=4 Pt 2 |pages=430–40 |year=2006 |pmid=16691174 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | ||
*CT scans have a higher sensitivity (63%) and are accurate in | *CT scans have a higher sensitivity (63%) and are accurate in locating the site of obstruction.<ref name="TseBarkun2006">{{cite journal|last1=Tse|first1=Frances|last2=Barkun|first2=Jeffrey S.|last3=Romagnuolo|first3=Joseph|last4=Friedman|first4=Gad|last5=Bornstein|first5=Jeffrey D.|last6=Barkun|first6=Alan N.|title=Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction|journal=HPB|volume=8|issue=6|year=2006|pages=409–425|issn=1365182X|doi=10.1080/13651820600746867}}</ref> | ||
*The accuracy of conventional CT in determining the presence and level of obstruction is between | *The accuracy of conventional CT scans in determining the presence and level of obstruction is between 81% and 94%.<ref name="TseBarkun2006">{{cite journal|last1=Tse|first1=Frances|last2=Barkun|first2=Jeffrey S.|last3=Romagnuolo|first3=Joseph|last4=Friedman|first4=Gad|last5=Bornstein|first5=Jeffrey D.|last6=Barkun|first6=Alan N.|title=Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction|journal=HPB|volume=8|issue=6|year=2006|pages=409–425|issn=1365182X|doi=10.1080/13651820600746867}}</ref> | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Revision as of 19:36, 21 September 2016
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Farwa Haideri [3]
|
Cholangitis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Cholangitis CT On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cholangitis CT |
Overview
CT scans may be helpful in location, with high sensitivity, the site of obstruction for cholangitis.
CT
- Computed tomography (CT) without contrast injections are more sensitive than ultrasounds in demonstrating choledocholithiasis, a predominant cause of acute cholangitis.[1]
- CT scans have a higher sensitivity (63%) and are accurate in locating the site of obstruction.[2]
- The accuracy of conventional CT scans in determining the presence and level of obstruction is between 81% and 94%.[2]
Axial non-contrast of ascending cholangitis[3]
References
- ↑ Gallix BP, Aufort S, Pierredon MA, Garibaldi F, Bruel JM (2006). "[Acute cholangitis: imaging diagnosis and management]". J Radiol (in French). 87 (4 Pt 2): 430–40. PMID 16691174.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Tse, Frances; Barkun, Jeffrey S.; Romagnuolo, Joseph; Friedman, Gad; Bornstein, Jeffrey D.; Barkun, Alan N. (2006). "Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction". HPB. 8 (6): 409–425. doi:10.1080/13651820600746867. ISSN 1365-182X.
- ↑ Image courtesy of Dr. Henry Knipe. [1]