Bacterial vaginosis laboratory findings: Difference between revisions
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Gram Satin=== | ===Gram Satin=== | ||
Gold standard for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is | Gold standard for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is a Garm stain of vaginal discharge.<ref name="pmid1706728">{{cite journal| author=Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL| title=Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. | journal=J Clin Microbiol | year= 1991 | volume= 29 | issue= 2 | pages= 297-301 | pmid=1706728 | doi= | pmc=269757 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=1706728 }} </ref> Gram staying is usually reserved for research studies and can be used with with the Hay/Ison criteria or the Nugent criteria. | ||
====Other Diagnostic Criteria==== | ====Other Diagnostic Criteria==== | ||
An alternative is to use a Gram stained vaginal smear, with the Hay/Ison criteria or the Nugent criteria.<ref name = HayIson>{{Citation | last1 = Ison | first1 = CA | last2 = Hay | first2 = PE | year = 2002 | title = Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics | journal = Sex Transm Infect | volume = 78 | pages = 413–415}}</ref><ref name="Nugent1991">{{cite journal |author=Nugent, R. P., M. A. Krohn, and S. L. Hillier | title=Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation | journal=J. Clin. Microbiol | year=1991 | volume=29 | pages=297–301 }}</ref> | An alternative is to use a Gram stained vaginal smear, with the Hay/Ison criteria or the Nugent criteria.<ref name = HayIson>{{Citation | last1 = Ison | first1 = CA | last2 = Hay | first2 = PE | year = 2002 | title = Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics | journal = Sex Transm Infect | volume = 78 | pages = 413–415}}</ref><ref name="Nugent1991">{{cite journal |author=Nugent, R. P., M. A. Krohn, and S. L. Hillier | title=Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation | journal=J. Clin. Microbiol | year=1991 | volume=29 | pages=297–301 }}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 20 October 2016
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
|
Bacterial vaginosis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Bacterial vaginosis laboratory findings On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Bacterial vaginosis laboratory findings |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Bacterial vaginosis laboratory findings |
Overview
Laboratory Findings
In clinical practice, the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is based on the presence of at least three Amsel criteria. Usually vginal swabs following speculum examination will be tested for:
- Whiff test: A small amount of an alkali is added to a microscope slide that has been swabbed with the discharge—a 'fishy' odour is a positive result for bacterial vaginosis.
- Loss of acidity: A swab of the discharge is put onto litmus paper to check the acidity. A positive result for bacterial vaginosis would be a pH>4.5 (normally slightly acidic with a pH of 3.8–4.2).
- Clue cells: epithelial cells coated with bacteria (under microscopic examination of the discharge)
In research studies, the use of Nugent or Hay/Ison criteria to evaluate a Gram-stained smear of vaginal discharge is the diagnostic standard.
Gram Satin
Gold standard for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is a Garm stain of vaginal discharge.[1] Gram staying is usually reserved for research studies and can be used with with the Hay/Ison criteria or the Nugent criteria.
Other Diagnostic Criteria
An alternative is to use a Gram stained vaginal smear, with the Hay/Ison criteria or the Nugent criteria.[2][3]
Hay/Ison Criteria
The Hay/Ison criteria are defined as follows: [4]
| Grading | Definition |
|---|---|
| Grade 0 | No bacteria present |
| Grade 1 | Lactobacillus morphotypes predominate |
| Garde 2 | Mixed flora with (some lactobacilli, gardnerella,or mobiluncus morphotypes present) |
| Garde 3 | Predominantly gardnerella and/or mobiluncus morphotypes (few or absent lactobacilli) |
| Garde 4 | Gram-positive cocci predominate |
- Grade 3 is diagnostic
Nugent Criteria The standard for research are the Nugent Criteria.[3]
| Score | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactobacillus morphotypes | >30 | 15-30 | <14 | <1 (this is an average) | 0 |
| Gardnerella/Bacteroides morphotypes | 0 | <1 (this is an average) | 1-4 | 5-30 | >30 |
| Curved Gram variable rods | 0 | <5 | >5 |
In this scale a score of 0-10 is generated from combining three other scores. It is time consuming and requires trained staff but is has high interobserver reliability:
- 0–3 is considered negative for bacterial vaginosis
- 4–6 is considered intermediate
- 7+ is considered indicative of bacterial vaginosis
Cytology
The Papanicolaou smear is not reliable for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.[5]
Culture
Vaginal culture has no role in diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.[6]
References
- ↑ Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL (1991). "Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation". J Clin Microbiol. 29 (2): 297–301. PMC 269757. PMID 1706728.
- ↑ Ison, CA; Hay, PE (2002), "Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics", Sex Transm Infect, 78: 413–415
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Nugent, R. P., M. A. Krohn, and S. L. Hillier (1991). "Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation". J. Clin. Microbiol. 29: 297&ndash, 301.
- ↑ Guideline Clearing House. "2002 national guideline for the management of bacterial vaginosis". Unknown parameter
|http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?ss=ignored (help) - ↑ Greene JF, Kuehl TJ, Allen SR (2000). "The papanicolaou smear: inadequate screening test for bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy". Am J Obstet Gynecol. 182 (5): 1048–9. PMID 10819823.
- ↑ Stockdale CK (2016). "A Positive Culture Result for Gardnerella Is Not Diagnostic of Bacterial Vaginosis". J Low Genit Tract Dis. 20 (4): 281–2. doi:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000237. PMID 27428605.