Sandbox:Hematuria differential diagnosis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Gross hematuria should always be considered significant, because it is a sign of malignancy until proven otherwise. Roughly 4% of patients with microscopic hematuria and up to 40% of patients with gross hematuria could be harboring a malignancy.<ref name="pmid27261791">{{cite journal| author=Avellino GJ, Bose S, Wang DS| title=Diagnosis and Management of Hematuria. | journal=Surg Clin North Am | year= 2016 | volume= 96 | issue= 3 | pages= 503-15 | pmid=27261791 | doi=10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.007 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=27261791 }}</ref> | Gross hematuria should always be considered significant, because it is a sign of malignancy until proven otherwise. Roughly 4% of patients with microscopic hematuria and up to 40% of patients with gross hematuria could be harboring a malignancy.<ref name="pmid27261791">{{cite journal| author=Avellino GJ, Bose S, Wang DS| title=Diagnosis and Management of Hematuria. | journal=Surg Clin North Am | year= 2016 | volume= 96 | issue= 3 | pages= 503-15 | pmid=27261791 | doi=10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.007 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=27261791 }}</ref> | ||
== References == | |||
Revision as of 19:01, 22 November 2016
Gross hematuria should always be considered significant, because it is a sign of malignancy until proven otherwise. Roughly 4% of patients with microscopic hematuria and up to 40% of patients with gross hematuria could be harboring a malignancy.[1]
References
- ↑ Avellino GJ, Bose S, Wang DS (2016). "Diagnosis and Management of Hematuria". Surg Clin North Am. 96 (3): 503–15. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.007. PMID 27261791.