Pleural empyema medical therapy: Difference between revisions
Prince Djan (talk | contribs) |
Prince Djan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Medical Therapy== | ==Medical Therapy== | ||
Definitive treatment for empyema entails drainage of the infected pleural fluid. A [[chest tube]] may be inserted, often using ultrasound guidance. [[Intravenous]] [[antibiotic]]s are given. If this is insufficient, surgical [[debridement]] of the pleural space may be required. | Definitive treatment for empyema entails drainage of the infected pleural fluid. A [[chest tube]] may be inserted, often using ultrasound guidance. [[Intravenous]] [[antibiotic]]s are given. If this is insufficient, surgical [[debridement]] of the pleural space may be required. | ||
===Pharmacotherapy=== | |||
====Acute Pharmacotherapies==== | |||
* Appropriate [[antibiotics]] are indicated in all patients with an underlying [[infection]]. Drainage of the pleural space should be considered early, as delay of even a few days is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. | |||
** Indications for chest tube drainage include:<ref name="pmid2019172">{{cite journal| author=Ashbaugh DG| title=Empyema thoracis. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality. | journal=Chest | year= 1991 | volume= 99 | issue= 5 | pages= 1162-5 | pmid=2019172 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=2019172 }} </ref><ref name="pmid7634854">{{cite journal| author=Light RW| title=A new classification of parapneumonic effusions and empyema. | journal=Chest | year= 1995 | volume= 108 | issue= 2 | pages= 299-301 | pmid=7634854 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7634854 }} </ref><ref name="pmid11035692">{{cite journal| author=Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, Heffner J, Light R, Littenberg B et al.| title=Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions : an evidence-based guideline. | journal=Chest | year= 2000 | volume= 118 | issue= 4 | pages= 1158-71 | pmid=11035692 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=11035692 }} </ref> a pH < 7.0, glucose < 40-50, gross [[pus]], or organisms on Gram’s stain. | |||
*** In borderline cases, reassessment with a repeat tap should be preformed in 12 – 24 hours. If the [[LDH]] is increasing, and the pH and glucose are decreasing, a chest tube should be placed immediately. | |||
*** The chest tube should be at least a 28 F (smaller tubes become obstructed with fibrin clot), and left in place until the drainage is clear and yellow, and its volume is < 50 cc/day. | |||
*** Patients will get better within 24 – 48 hours. If they don’t, suspect inadequate drainage due to loculations or inappropriate antibiotics. | |||
** [[Thrombolytics]] (mainly [[Urokinase]] and [[Streptokinase]]) have been used to break up loculations and assist drainage.<ref name="pmid27866276">{{cite journal| author=Porcel JM, Valencia H, Bielsa S| title=Manual Intrapleural Saline Flushing Plus Urokinase: A Potentially Useful Therapy for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyemas. | journal=Lung | year= 2016 | volume= | issue= | pages= | pmid=27866276 | doi=10.1007/s00408-016-9964-2 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=27866276 }} </ref><ref name="pmid21830966">{{cite journal| author=Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C et al.| title=Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2011 | volume= 365 | issue= 6 | pages= 518-26 | pmid=21830966 | doi=10.1056/NEJMoa1012740 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21830966 }} [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22184710 Review in: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):JC6-9] </ref> | |||
*** The typical [[Streptokinase]] (SK) dose is 250,000 units in 30 – 100 cc normal saline solution (NS), and the typical [[Urokinase]] dose in 100,000 units, also in 30 – 60 cc NS. They are instilled via the chest tube, left in place for 1-4 hours (chest tube clamped), and repeated daily as needed. | |||
**** Two randomized studies comparing SK to chest tube drainage alone have shown an increase in the amount of drainage, however a statistical difference in the resolution of [[white blood cell]] (WBC) count and [[fever]], the need for surgical drainage, or the duration of hospitalization has not been demonstrated. | |||
** More recently, however, VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) has been compared to treatment by treatment with SK and chest tube drainage (SK-CT) in randomized trials.<ref name="pmid27815709">{{cite journal| author=Reichert M, Hecker M, Witte B, Bodner J, Padberg W, Weigand MA et al.| title=Stage-directed therapy of pleural empyema. | journal=Langenbecks Arch Surg | year= 2016 | volume= | issue= | pages= | pmid=27815709 | doi=10.1007/s00423-016-1498-9 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=27815709 }} </ref> | |||
*** Wait et.al. studied 20 patients and found that VATS was associated with a significantly higher primary treatment success (91% vs. 44%), lower chest tube duration (6 days vs. 10 days) and a lower number of hospital days (9 vs. 13). VATS was also associated with a non-significant trend towards lower hospital costs. | |||
**** They felt that SK-CT only delayed, and did not prevent definitive treatment with VATS. | |||
**** It should be noted, however, that the patients in Wait’s study had fibrinopurulent empyema, and not simple parapneumonic effusions or chronic empyema. | |||
** Obviously, the definitive answer is still out on the optimal management of empyema, however, the above data may indicate a more aggressive approach in these patients. | |||
==Antibiotic Therapy== | ==Antibiotic Therapy== |
Revision as of 18:25, 16 January 2017
Pleural empyema Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Pleural empyema medical therapy On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pleural empyema medical therapy |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Pleural empyema medical therapy |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Chetan Lokhande, M.B.B.S [2]
Overview
The mainstay of therapy for empyema includes:[1] controlling the infectious focus, drainage of fluid and pus, re-expansion of the lung. This involes the use of antimicrobial agents, thrombolytics,[2][3] and drainage of the pleural space.[4][5][6] Pharmacologic therapies for acute empyema include either Ceftriaxone, Nafcillin or Oxacillin, Vancomycin or Linezolid, or TMP-SMX. The preferred regimen for subacute and chronic empyema is a combination of Clindamycin and Ceftriaxone.
Medical Therapy
Definitive treatment for empyema entails drainage of the infected pleural fluid. A chest tube may be inserted, often using ultrasound guidance. Intravenous antibiotics are given. If this is insufficient, surgical debridement of the pleural space may be required.
Pharmacotherapy
Acute Pharmacotherapies
- Appropriate antibiotics are indicated in all patients with an underlying infection. Drainage of the pleural space should be considered early, as delay of even a few days is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality.
- Indications for chest tube drainage include:[4][5][6] a pH < 7.0, glucose < 40-50, gross pus, or organisms on Gram’s stain.
- In borderline cases, reassessment with a repeat tap should be preformed in 12 – 24 hours. If the LDH is increasing, and the pH and glucose are decreasing, a chest tube should be placed immediately.
- The chest tube should be at least a 28 F (smaller tubes become obstructed with fibrin clot), and left in place until the drainage is clear and yellow, and its volume is < 50 cc/day.
- Patients will get better within 24 – 48 hours. If they don’t, suspect inadequate drainage due to loculations or inappropriate antibiotics.
- Thrombolytics (mainly Urokinase and Streptokinase) have been used to break up loculations and assist drainage.[2][3]
- The typical Streptokinase (SK) dose is 250,000 units in 30 – 100 cc normal saline solution (NS), and the typical Urokinase dose in 100,000 units, also in 30 – 60 cc NS. They are instilled via the chest tube, left in place for 1-4 hours (chest tube clamped), and repeated daily as needed.
- Two randomized studies comparing SK to chest tube drainage alone have shown an increase in the amount of drainage, however a statistical difference in the resolution of white blood cell (WBC) count and fever, the need for surgical drainage, or the duration of hospitalization has not been demonstrated.
- The typical Streptokinase (SK) dose is 250,000 units in 30 – 100 cc normal saline solution (NS), and the typical Urokinase dose in 100,000 units, also in 30 – 60 cc NS. They are instilled via the chest tube, left in place for 1-4 hours (chest tube clamped), and repeated daily as needed.
- More recently, however, VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) has been compared to treatment by treatment with SK and chest tube drainage (SK-CT) in randomized trials.[1]
- Wait et.al. studied 20 patients and found that VATS was associated with a significantly higher primary treatment success (91% vs. 44%), lower chest tube duration (6 days vs. 10 days) and a lower number of hospital days (9 vs. 13). VATS was also associated with a non-significant trend towards lower hospital costs.
- They felt that SK-CT only delayed, and did not prevent definitive treatment with VATS.
- It should be noted, however, that the patients in Wait’s study had fibrinopurulent empyema, and not simple parapneumonic effusions or chronic empyema.
- Wait et.al. studied 20 patients and found that VATS was associated with a significantly higher primary treatment success (91% vs. 44%), lower chest tube duration (6 days vs. 10 days) and a lower number of hospital days (9 vs. 13). VATS was also associated with a non-significant trend towards lower hospital costs.
- Obviously, the definitive answer is still out on the optimal management of empyema, however, the above data may indicate a more aggressive approach in these patients.
- Indications for chest tube drainage include:[4][5][6] a pH < 7.0, glucose < 40-50, gross pus, or organisms on Gram’s stain.
Antibiotic Therapy
Following are the guidelines to treat Pleural empyema .[7][8]
▸ Click on the following categories to expand treatment regimens.
Pleural Empyema ▸ Neonates ▸ Infants/Children ▸ Adult |
|
|
|
Fibrinolytic agents
- Empyema drainage is facilitated by the use of intrapleural use of fibrinolytic agents .[9][10][11][12][13][14]
- Surgical thoracotomy with decortication is preferred to thorascopic debridement in patients who have more pleural thickness , larger cavity and adhesions.[15][16][17]
- Thrombolytics (mainly Urokinase and Streptokinase) have been used to break up loculations and assist drainage.[18][19]
- The typical Streptokinase (SK) dose is 250,000 units in 30 – 100 cc normal saline solution (NS), and the typical Urokinase dose in 100,000 units, also in 30 – 60 cc NS. They are instilled via the chest tube, left in place for 1-4 hours (chest tube clamped), and repeated daily as needed.
- Two randomized studies comparing SK to chest tube drainage alone have shown an increase in the amount of drainage, however a statistical difference in the resolution of white blood cell (WBC) count and fever, the need for surgical drainage, or the duration of hospitalization has not been demonstrated.
Post surgical complications
An empyema forming in a space created by surgery with or without a fistula between bronchus and pleura should be treated carefully.[20]Available treatment options are :
- Irrigation with antibiotic
- Filling up the space with pedicles of muscles
- Closing the fistula surgically
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Reichert M, Hecker M, Witte B, Bodner J, Padberg W, Weigand MA; et al. (2016). "Stage-directed therapy of pleural empyema". Langenbecks Arch Surg. doi:10.1007/s00423-016-1498-9. PMID 27815709.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Porcel JM, Valencia H, Bielsa S (2016). "Manual Intrapleural Saline Flushing Plus Urokinase: A Potentially Useful Therapy for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyemas". Lung. doi:10.1007/s00408-016-9964-2. PMID 27866276.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C; et al. (2011). "Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection". N Engl J Med. 365 (6): 518–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012740. PMID 21830966. Review in: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):JC6-9
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Ashbaugh DG (1991). "Empyema thoracis. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality". Chest. 99 (5): 1162–5. PMID 2019172.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Light RW (1995). "A new classification of parapneumonic effusions and empyema". Chest. 108 (2): 299–301. PMID 7634854.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, Heffner J, Light R, Littenberg B; et al. (2000). "Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions : an evidence-based guideline". Chest. 118 (4): 1158–71. PMID 11035692.
- ↑ Bradley, JS.; Byington, CL.; Shah, SS.; Alverson, B.; Carter, ER.; Harrison, C.; Kaplan, SL.; Mace, SE.; McCracken, GH. (2011). "The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America". Clin Infect Dis. 53 (7): e25–76. doi:10.1093/cid/cir531. PMID 21880587. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Rahman, NM.; Maskell, NA.; West, A.; Teoh, R.; Arnold, A.; Mackinlay, C.; Peckham, D.; Davies, CW.; Ali, N. (2011). "Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection". N Engl J Med. 365 (6): 518–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012740. PMID 21830966. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Jerjes-Sánchez, C.; Ramirez-Rivera, A.; Elizalde, JJ.; Delgado, R.; Cicero, R.; Ibarra-Perez, C.; Arroliga, AC.; Padua, A.; Portales, A. (1996). "Intrapleural fibrinolysis with streptokinase as an adjunctive treatment in hemothorax and empyema: a multicenter trial". Chest. 109 (6): 1514–9. PMID 8769503. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Temes, RT.; Follis, F.; Kessler, RM.; Pett, SB.; Wernly, JA. (1996). "Intrapleural fibrinolytics in management of empyema thoracis". Chest. 110 (1): 102–6. PMID 8681611. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Davies, RJ.; Traill, ZC.; Gleeson, FV. (1997). "Randomised controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase in community acquired pleural infection". Thorax. 52 (5): 416–21. PMID 9176531. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Bouros, D.; Schiza, S.; Tzanakis, N.; Chalkiadakis, G.; Drositis, J.; Siafakas, N. (1999). "Intrapleural urokinase versus normal saline in the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema. A randomized, double-blind study". Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 159 (1): 37–42. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9803094. PMID 9872815. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Diacon, AH.; Theron, J.; Schuurmans, MM.; Van de Wal, BW.; Bolliger, CT. (2004). "Intrapleural streptokinase for empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions". Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 170 (1): 49–53. doi:10.1164/rccm.200312-1740OC. PMID 15044206. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Thomson, AH.; Hull, J.; Kumar, MR.; Wallis, C.; Balfour Lynn, IM. (2002). "Randomised trial of intrapleural urokinase in the treatment of childhood empyema". Thorax. 57 (4): 343–7. PMID 11923554. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Thommi, G.; Nair, CK.; Aronow, WS.; Shehan, C.; Meyers, P.; McLeay, M. "Efficacy and safety of intrapleural instillation of alteplase in the management of complicated pleural effusion or empyema". Am J Ther. 14 (4): 341–5. doi:10.1097/01.mjt.0000208275.88120.d1. PMID 17667208.
- ↑ Tuncozgur, B.; Ustunsoy, H.; Sivrikoz, MC.; Dikensoy, O.; Topal, M.; Sanli, M.; Elbeyli, L. (2001). "Intrapleural urokinase in the management of parapneumonic empyema: a randomised controlled trial". Int J Clin Pract. 55 (10): 658–60. PMID 11777287. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Tokuda, Y.; Matsushima, D.; Stein, GH.; Miyagi, S. (2006). "Intrapleural fibrinolytic agents for empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions: a meta-analysis". Chest. 129 (3): 783–90. doi:10.1378/chest.129.3.783. PMID 16537882. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Porcel JM, Valencia H, Bielsa S (2016). "Manual Intrapleural Saline Flushing Plus Urokinase: A Potentially Useful Therapy for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyemas". Lung. doi:10.1007/s00408-016-9964-2. PMID 27866276.
- ↑ Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C; et al. (2011). "Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection". N Engl J Med. 365 (6): 518–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012740. PMID 21830966. Review in: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):JC6-9
- ↑ CLAGETT, OT.; GERACI, JE. (1963). "A procedure for the management of postpneumonectomy empyema". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 45: 141–5. PMID 14021469. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help)