Dientamoebiasis historical perspective: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Changes made per Mahshid's request |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:General practice]] | [[Category:General practice]] | ||
[[Category:Abdominal pain]] | [[Category:Abdominal pain]] | ||
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | {{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | ||
{{WikiDoc Sources}} | {{WikiDoc Sources}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:35, 18 September 2017
|
Dientamoebiasis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Dientamoebiasis historical perspective On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Dientamoebiasis historical perspective |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Dientamoebiasis historical perspective |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: : Kalsang Dolma, M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
Early microbiologists reported that the organism was not pathogenic, even though six of the seven individuals from whom they isolated it were experiencing symptoms of dysentery. Their report, published in 1918, concluded the organism was not pathogenic because it consumed bacteria in culture, but did not appear to engulf red blood cells as was seen in the most well known disease causing amoeba of the time, Entamoeba histolytica. This initial report may still be contributing to the reluctance of physicians to diagnose the infection.