Rhinoscleroma laboratory findings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m Changes made per Mahshid's request |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Needs overview]] | [[Category:Needs overview]] | ||
[[Category:Bacterium-related cutaneous conditions]] | [[Category:Bacterium-related cutaneous conditions]] | ||
{{WH}} | {{WH}} | ||
{{WS}} | {{WS}} |
Latest revision as of 18:38, 18 September 2017
Rhinoscleroma Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Rhinoscleroma laboratory findings On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Rhinoscleroma laboratory findings |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Rhinoscleroma laboratory findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Laboratory Findings
A positive culture in MacConkey agar is diagnostic, but cultures are only positive in 50-60% of cases. Diagnostic characteristics are most commonly found in the granulomatous stage and are described as being chronic inflammatory cells, Russell bodies, and pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, and groups of large vacuolated histiocytes containing Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis (Mikulicz cells).