Stomach cancer echocardiography or ultrasound: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Stomach cancer}} | {{Stomach cancer}} | ||
* Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most reliable diagnostic technique for evaluating the depth of invasion of primary gastric cancers, although newer CT techniques and MRI may achieve similar results in terms of diagnostic accuracy. [40,47,48] | |||
* The sensitivity and specificity rates were 85 and 90 percent, respectively for ealry gastric cancers and 86 and 90 percent, respectively for advanced cases. 42 | |||
* For metastatic involvement of lymph nodes, the summary sensitivity and specificity rates were 83 and 67 percent, respectively. | |||
* EUS cannot be considered optimal for distinguishing positive versus negative lymph node status. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 14 November 2017
|
Stomach cancer Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Stomach cancer echocardiography or ultrasound On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Stomach cancer echocardiography or ultrasound |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Stomach cancer echocardiography or ultrasound |
- Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most reliable diagnostic technique for evaluating the depth of invasion of primary gastric cancers, although newer CT techniques and MRI may achieve similar results in terms of diagnostic accuracy. [40,47,48]
- The sensitivity and specificity rates were 85 and 90 percent, respectively for ealry gastric cancers and 86 and 90 percent, respectively for advanced cases. 42
- For metastatic involvement of lymph nodes, the summary sensitivity and specificity rates were 83 and 67 percent, respectively.
- EUS cannot be considered optimal for distinguishing positive versus negative lymph node status.