Sandbox:ajay: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ajay Gade (talk | contribs)
Ajay Gade (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Dilation==
==Pathophysiology==
*Dilation is considered safe and effective in relieving the dysphagia in patients with Eosinophilic esophagitis.  
*The initial studies of esophageal acid clearance in patients with reflux esophagitis suggested that acid clearance time was almost invariably
*Esophageal dilation has a very good acceptance in patients and it does not influence eosinophilic inflammation.
longer in the patients than in normal subjects (193).  
*Patients with esophageal strictures can be treated by esophageal dilation.  
*Subsequent studies, however, demonstrated that substantial overlap in acid clearance times occurred between patients and controls (198,200). Thus, some patients with reflux symptoms exhibit normal esophageal acid clearance times whereas in other patients acid clearance is abnormally long.
*Esophageal dilation is contraindicated in patients with endoscopic signs of acute inflammation.
*What accounts for delayed acid clearance in some of the patients?
*Postprocedural pain is very common with esophageal dilation.
*One obvious candidate as a cause for delayed esophageal clearance is an abnormal esophageal motor function. Abnormal esophageal motility is generally
*The use of swallowed topical steroids before dilation reduces the risk of endoscopic complications such as bleeding, perforation, and postprocedural pain.  
associated with prolonged acid clearance (200).  
*Delaying the procedure in patients with strictures can lead to acute food bolus impactions.
*Not all individuals with delayed acid clearance, however, have overt peristaltic dysfunction.  
*Food impactions should be should be dealt carefully as they can cause spontaneous esophageal perforation, procedure-induced complications.
*Regrettably, the subject of esophageal-body motor function in patients with reflux esophagitis has received negligible attention (5).  
 
*Earlier reports based on manometry with non-infused catheters suggested that the majority of patients manifest disordered esophageal motor activity after deglutition (208,209).  
==Lab==
*The predominant motor abnormality appeared to be an increased incidence of nonperistaltic contractions, often repetitive, in the distal esophagus. *These contractions were believed to cause ineffective esophageal emptying in recumbent subjects.
There are 3 main ways in which food allergies can be detected in EE are as follows
*Subsequent studies using infused-catheter manometry suggest that many, if not the majority, of patients with reflux esophagitis, have overtly normal primary peristalsis (28,198).  
 
*A recent study suggests that that patients with reflux esophagitis and controls have a similar high frequency of swallowing in the awake
'''Skin prick testing'''
state and low frequency while asleep (205).  
* A small amount of allergen is introduced into the skin of the patient through a gentle puncture with a prick device.
*Additional data are needed, however, about swallowing frequency and incidence of intact primary peristaltic sequences in the esophagitis patients. *Even less is known about secondary peristalsis in patients with reflux esophagitis.
 
*In patients with reflux esophagitis accompanied by esophageal-body motor dysfunction, the motor abnormality may either antedate the reflux esophagitis or be caused by the esophagitis.  
* The allergens that are used for this purpose are either from a laboratory manufacture or freshly prepared by the doctor before the test.
*Again, the choice need not be "either-or." We have observed both types of circumstances.
 
In some patients, esophageal motor abnormalities improve or disappear after healing of reflux esophagitis.  
* Allergy skin testing provides the allergist with specific information on what you are and are not allergic to.  
*This sequence argues that the motor abnormality was secondary.  
 
*In other patients, esophageal motor dysfunction persists after complete resolution of reflux esophagitis. This finding suggests that the motor
* Patients who are sensitive to the allergen have an allergic antibody called Immunoglobulin E (IgE), which causes type-1 hypersensitivity reaction and cause an area of redness  and swelling around the prick
dysfunction either preceded reflux esophagitis or the esophagitis was sufficiently severe to cause permanent damage to esophageal muscle or nerves. *Regardless of whether esophageal motor dysfunction is primary or secondary, this feature, once present, may create a vicious cycle whereby esophageal motor dysfunction leads to increasingly severe reflux esophagitis that in turn further impairs esophageal motor function.
 
*A second factor that could cause delayed acid clearance is abnormal salivation.  
* It takes about 15 minutes for you to see what happens from the test. However, these tests may have limited use in identifying foods causing or driving EoE.
*Diminished salivation would decrease: (a) swallowing frequency and (b) the volume of saliva available to dilute, neutralize, and washout esophageal acid.  
'''Blood allergy testing'''
*Another possible abnormality of saliva is a decreased capacity for acid neutralization.
* Serum specific immune assay can be done for the allergen testing especially in patients with food allergies.  
*Although salivation is known to be defective in certain disease entities such as Sjogren's syndrome, salivary flow and content remain to be comprehensively analyzed in patients with reflux esophagitis.
 
*Regardless of the underlying cause, delayed esophageal clearance promotes esophageal exposure to the refluxed material. Some patients with reflux
* Although there are many limitations for the prick testing and the blood testing for the allergy in patients with EoE, prick testing is considered more efficient than the blood testing in EoE.  
esophagitis may have the same frequency of GE reflux as healthy subjects, but sustain an excessive esophageal exposure to acid because of an abnormality in esophageal acid clearance.
'''Atopy patch testing'''
* Atopy patch testing is another way of identifying the allergies in patients with EoE.  
* This more useful in pediatric population than in the adults.  
* Patch testing used to identify patients with delayed reactions to a food.
* '''Procedure''':
** A small amount of a fresh food in a small aluminum chamber called a Finn chamber.  
** The Finn chamber is then taped on the person’s back.
** The food in the chamber stays in contact with the skin for 48 hours.  
** It is then removed and the allergist reads the results at 72 hours.  
** A positive delayed reaction to the food is determined by the inflamed area of the skin around the Finn chamber.  
* The results from the food patch test helps the physician to determine which foods can be avoided
* All the above mentioned tests can have false positive tests, it is also possible to have a false negative test, meaning that the prick, blood or patch tests are negative yet the allergen can contribute towards a patient’s EoE.
 
==Complications==
*The complications of the EoE are as follows:
*Scarring of esophagus-leading to dysphagia
*Esophageal stenosis- causing food stuck
*Tears or perforation during the endoscopy or retching leading to Boar-heave syndrome.
 
==Medical therapy==
Treatment Advantages Disadvantages
Medications
Topical steroids (fluticasone, budesonide) Ease of  administration.High degree of efficacy in randomized controlled trials. Candidiasis, Recurrent disease activity after cessation of topical steroids
Systemic steroids High degree of effectiveness.Ease of administration Toxicities of systemic steroidRecurrent disease after cessation
Antihistamines Ease of administration Limited data to support effectiveness
Leukotriene antagonist Symptom improvement in uncontrolled studies Higher doses may be needed for effectNo change in esophageal eosinophiliaSide effects of nausea and myalgias
Immunomodulator (azathioprine, 6 mercaptopurine) Steroid sparing agent ImmunosuppressionSide effect profileLimited data (3 patients) to support use
Anti-TNF therapy (infliximab) Rationale based on increased tissue expression of TNF No clinical improvement in a small uncontrolled trial
Anti-IL-5 therapy Rationale based on role of IL-5 in systemic eosinophilic disorders Conflicting data to support efficacy
Cromolyn sodium Rationale based on asthma model Limited pediatric data does not support effectiveness
Diet
Elemental High degree of effectivenessSimplified initial formula dietAvoidance of long-term use of medications Poor palatabilityRequires prolonged period of foodReintroductionNeed for repeated EGD and biopsies to identify allergen
Directed elimination High degree of effectivenessTheoretical advantage of more selective dietAvoidance of long-term use of medications Skin prick test with poor predictive valueAtopy patch testing not standardizedNeed for repeated EGD and biopsies to identify allergen
Empiric elimination High degree of effectivenessAvoidance of long-term use of medications Need for repeated EGD and biopsy to identify allergenHigh degree of vigilance to avoid contamination
Dilation
High degree of effectivenessProlonged symptom response without medications Reports of esophageal laceration causing significant painReports of esophageal perforation and hospitalization
 
 
 
 
{{familytree/start}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | A01 | | | | | |A01=A01}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | A02 | | | | | |A02=A02}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | A02 | | | | | |A02=A02}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | |,|-|-|-|-|^|-|-|-|-|-|.| | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | B01 | | | | | | | | | B02 |B01=B01|B02=B02}}
{{familytree | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | | | |!| | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | C01 | | | | | | | | | C02 | | | C01=C01|C02=C02}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | |}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | D01 | | | |D01=D01}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | |}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | E01 | | | | |E01=E01 }}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | |,|-|-|-|-|-|+|-|-|-|-|-|.| | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | B01 | | | | B02 | | | | B03 | | |B01=B01|B02=B02|B03=B03}}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | |!| | | | | |!| | | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | |!| | | | | |!| | | | }}
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | C01 | | | | C02 | | | | C03 | | |C01=C01|C02=C02|C03=C03}}
{{familytree/end}}

Revision as of 17:00, 21 December 2017

Pathophysiology

  • The initial studies of esophageal acid clearance in patients with reflux esophagitis suggested that acid clearance time was almost invariably

longer in the patients than in normal subjects (193).

  • Subsequent studies, however, demonstrated that substantial overlap in acid clearance times occurred between patients and controls (198,200). Thus, some patients with reflux symptoms exhibit normal esophageal acid clearance times whereas in other patients acid clearance is abnormally long.
  • What accounts for delayed acid clearance in some of the patients?
  • One obvious candidate as a cause for delayed esophageal clearance is an abnormal esophageal motor function. Abnormal esophageal motility is generally

associated with prolonged acid clearance (200).

  • Not all individuals with delayed acid clearance, however, have overt peristaltic dysfunction.
  • Regrettably, the subject of esophageal-body motor function in patients with reflux esophagitis has received negligible attention (5).
  • Earlier reports based on manometry with non-infused catheters suggested that the majority of patients manifest disordered esophageal motor activity after deglutition (208,209).
  • The predominant motor abnormality appeared to be an increased incidence of nonperistaltic contractions, often repetitive, in the distal esophagus. *These contractions were believed to cause ineffective esophageal emptying in recumbent subjects.
  • Subsequent studies using infused-catheter manometry suggest that many, if not the majority, of patients with reflux esophagitis, have overtly normal primary peristalsis (28,198).
  • A recent study suggests that that patients with reflux esophagitis and controls have a similar high frequency of swallowing in the awake

state and low frequency while asleep (205).

  • Additional data are needed, however, about swallowing frequency and incidence of intact primary peristaltic sequences in the esophagitis patients. *Even less is known about secondary peristalsis in patients with reflux esophagitis.
  • In patients with reflux esophagitis accompanied by esophageal-body motor dysfunction, the motor abnormality may either antedate the reflux esophagitis or be caused by the esophagitis.
  • Again, the choice need not be "either-or." We have observed both types of circumstances.

In some patients, esophageal motor abnormalities improve or disappear after healing of reflux esophagitis.

  • This sequence argues that the motor abnormality was secondary.
  • In other patients, esophageal motor dysfunction persists after complete resolution of reflux esophagitis. This finding suggests that the motor

dysfunction either preceded reflux esophagitis or the esophagitis was sufficiently severe to cause permanent damage to esophageal muscle or nerves. *Regardless of whether esophageal motor dysfunction is primary or secondary, this feature, once present, may create a vicious cycle whereby esophageal motor dysfunction leads to increasingly severe reflux esophagitis that in turn further impairs esophageal motor function.

  • A second factor that could cause delayed acid clearance is abnormal salivation.
  • Diminished salivation would decrease: (a) swallowing frequency and (b) the volume of saliva available to dilute, neutralize, and washout esophageal acid.
  • Another possible abnormality of saliva is a decreased capacity for acid neutralization.
  • Although salivation is known to be defective in certain disease entities such as Sjogren's syndrome, salivary flow and content remain to be comprehensively analyzed in patients with reflux esophagitis.
  • Regardless of the underlying cause, delayed esophageal clearance promotes esophageal exposure to the refluxed material. Some patients with reflux

esophagitis may have the same frequency of GE reflux as healthy subjects, but sustain an excessive esophageal exposure to acid because of an abnormality in esophageal acid clearance.