Boerhaave syndrome other imaging findings: Difference between revisions
m Categories |
Mohamed Diab (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Boerhaave syndrome}} | {{Boerhaave syndrome}} | ||
{{CMG}} | {{CMG}} {{AE}} {{DM}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
==Other Imaging Findings== | ==Other Imaging Findings== | ||
Revision as of 20:43, 28 December 2017
|
Boerhaave syndrome Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Boerhaave syndrome other imaging findings On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Boerhaave syndrome other imaging findings |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Boerhaave syndrome other imaging findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamed Diab, MD [2]
Overview
Other Imaging Findings
The diagnosis of esophageal perforation could also be confirmed by water-soluble contrast esophagram (Gastrograffin), which reveals the location and extent of extravasation of contrast material. Although barium is superior in demonstrating small perforations, the spillage of barium sulfate into the mediastinal and pleural cavities can cause an inflammatory response and subsequent fibrosis and is therefore not used as the primary diagnostic study. If, however, the water-soluble study is negative, a barium study should be performed for better definition.
Endoscopy has no role in the diagnosis of spontaneous esophageal perforation. Both the endoscope and insufflation of air can extend the perforation and introduce air into the mediastinum.