Sialolithiasis other imaging findings: Difference between revisions
Hamid Qazi (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Sialolithiasis}} | {{Sialolithiasis}} | ||
{{CMG}}; {{AE}}{{MA}} | {{CMG}}; {{AE}}{{MA}} [mailto:malihash@bidmc.harvard.edu] | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Sialography may be helpful in the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. Findings on sialography suggestive of sialolithiasis include filling defect and the contrast agent not passing through the duct due to complete obstruction. | [[Sialography]] may be helpful in the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. Findings on [[sialography]] suggestive of sialolithiasis include filling defect and the contrast agent not passing through the duct due to complete obstruction. | ||
==Other Imaging Findings== | ==Other Imaging Findings== | ||
Conventional sialography may be helpful in the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. | Conventional [[sialography]] may be helpful in the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. Findings on [[sialography]] suggestive of sialolithiasis include:<ref name="pmid10966693">{{cite journal |vauthors=Jäger L, Menauer F, Holzknecht N, Scholz V, Grevers G, Reiser M |title=Sialolithiasis: MR sialography of the submandibular duct--an alternative to conventional sialography and US? |journal=Radiology |volume=216 |issue=3 |pages=665–71 |year=2000 |pmid=10966693 |doi=10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se12665 |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid12372736">{{cite journal |vauthors=Kalinowski M, Heverhagen JT, Rehberg E, Klose KJ, Wagner HJ |title=Comparative study of MR sialography and digital subtraction sialography for benign salivary gland disorders |journal=AJNR Am J Neuroradiol |volume=23 |issue=9 |pages=1485–92 |year=2002 |pmid=12372736 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | ||
* Filling defect within the duct | * Filling defect within the duct | ||
* In complete obstruction, contrast can not pass beyond the stone | * In complete obstruction, contrast can not pass beyond the stone | ||
Sialography is contraindicated in active infection of the involved gland. | [[Sialography]] is contraindicated in active infection of the involved gland. | ||
Sialography is replaced by CT scan and ultrasound. | [[Sialography]] is replaced by [[Computed tomography|CT scan]] and [[ultrasound]]. | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 19:34, 9 February 2018
Sialolithiasis Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Sialolithiasis other imaging findings On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Sialolithiasis other imaging findings |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Sialolithiasis other imaging findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mahda Alihashemi M.D. [2] [3]
Overview
Sialography may be helpful in the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. Findings on sialography suggestive of sialolithiasis include filling defect and the contrast agent not passing through the duct due to complete obstruction.
Other Imaging Findings
Conventional sialography may be helpful in the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. Findings on sialography suggestive of sialolithiasis include:[1][2]
- Filling defect within the duct
- In complete obstruction, contrast can not pass beyond the stone
Sialography is contraindicated in active infection of the involved gland.
Sialography is replaced by CT scan and ultrasound.
References
- ↑ Jäger L, Menauer F, Holzknecht N, Scholz V, Grevers G, Reiser M (2000). "Sialolithiasis: MR sialography of the submandibular duct--an alternative to conventional sialography and US?". Radiology. 216 (3): 665–71. doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se12665. PMID 10966693.
- ↑ Kalinowski M, Heverhagen JT, Rehberg E, Klose KJ, Wagner HJ (2002). "Comparative study of MR sialography and digital subtraction sialography for benign salivary gland disorders". AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 23 (9): 1485–92. PMID 12372736.