SAPHO syndrome: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== Clinical presentation == | == Clinical presentation == | ||
Osteoarticular manifestations involve osteitis, hyperostosis, | Osteoarticular manifestations involve osteitis, hyperostosis, | ||
Line 52: | Line 46: | ||
with pain, tenderness, and sometimes swelling over the | with pain, tenderness, and sometimes swelling over the | ||
affected areas and fever. Osteitis is the inflammation of | affected areas and fever. | ||
Osteitis is the inflammation of | |||
bone, which may involve the cortex and the medullary | bone, which may involve the cortex and the medullary | ||
Line 60: | Line 56: | ||
may result in enthesopathic new bone formation and joint | may result in enthesopathic new bone formation and joint | ||
fusion (Fig. 1). Synovitis mostly manifests as nonerosive | fusion (Fig. 1). | ||
Synovitis mostly manifests as nonerosive | |||
oligoarthritis of larger joints. Joint involvement can be | oligoarthritis of larger joints. Joint involvement can be | ||
Line 70: | Line 68: | ||
92.5 % of SAPHO cases. The axial skeleton is involved in | 92.5 % of SAPHO cases. The axial skeleton is involved in | ||
91 % and the peripheral joints in 36 % of cases. Besides | 91 % and the peripheral joints in 36 % of cases. | ||
Besides | |||
sternocostal and sternoclavicular joints, which are the most | sternocostal and sternoclavicular joints, which are the most |
Revision as of 20:36, 29 March 2018
SAPHO syndrome | |
DiseasesDB | 30718 |
---|
WikiDoc Resources for SAPHO syndrome |
Articles |
---|
Most recent articles on SAPHO syndrome Most cited articles on SAPHO syndrome |
Media |
Powerpoint slides on SAPHO syndrome |
Evidence Based Medicine |
Clinical Trials |
Ongoing Trials on SAPHO syndrome at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on SAPHO syndrome Clinical Trials on SAPHO syndrome at Google
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt |
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on SAPHO syndrome NICE Guidance on SAPHO syndrome
|
Books |
News |
Commentary |
Definitions |
Patient Resources / Community |
Patient resources on SAPHO syndrome Discussion groups on SAPHO syndrome Patient Handouts on SAPHO syndrome Directions to Hospitals Treating SAPHO syndrome Risk calculators and risk factors for SAPHO syndrome
|
Healthcare Provider Resources |
Causes & Risk Factors for SAPHO syndrome |
Continuing Medical Education (CME) |
International |
|
Business |
Experimental / Informatics |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Synonyms and keywords: Acquired hyperostosis syndrome
Overview
SAPHO syndrome is thought to comprise a spectrum of disorders that share some clinical, radiologic and pathologic characteristics. An entity known as chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) was first described in 1972. Subsequently in 1978 several cases of CRMO were associated with clinical findings of palmoplantar pustulosis. Since then, a number of associations between skin conditions and osteoarticular disorders have been reported with a variety of different names including sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis, pustulotic arthro-osteitis, and acne-associated spondyloarthropathy. SAPHO was coined in 1987 and basically represents a spectrum of inflammatory osteitis which may or may not be associated with dermatologic pathology.
Definition
- Synovitis
- Acne -- commonly involving the face and upper back.
- Pustulosis -- usually involving the palms of the hands and/or soles of the feet (palmo-plantar pustulosis).
- Hyperostosis
- Osteitis
Etiology
- The etiology is still unknown [2]. The pathogenesis involves a combination of genetic and immunological components.
- HLA-B27 is more frequent in SAPHO.
- Chromosome 18 plays a role in the SAPHO syndrome. Lipin 2 is involved in modulating apoptosis of polymorphonuclear cells, and mutations of the NOD2 gene may lead to an abnormal immune response to bacterial peptidoglycans via activation of the proinflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B. [19].
- Different types of pathogens were isolated from different bone sites and pustules in the skin, including Staphylococcus aureus [20], Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and Actinomyces, as well as Treponema
- The most important is Propionibacterium acnes, which is identified more often, but positive cultures can only be seen in a small number of total bone biopsy specimens.
- According to some of them, humoral immune response is hyperactive and in others, it is hypoactive. This is similar to the cell-mediated immune response that has been reported as normal or hyperactive; total immune system impairment has been reported as well. [28]
- SAPHO is characterized by elevated IL-8 and IL-18 levels. They had not detect any autoantibodies among their SAPHO patients, including rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP2, or antinuclear antibodies. IL-8 and TNFa production by purified polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) were elevated in these patients compared to the controls, but the oxidative burst and IL-18 production were normal.
- They also showed that, after 28 days of etanercept therapy, PMN, IL-8, and TNFa production was downregulated and TNFa plasma levels were increased [30].
- Assman and Simon [2] have shown that the proinflammatory response observed in SAPHO is mediated by the ability of P. acnes to trigger interleukin IL-1, IL-8, and IL-18 and TNFa release by monocytes, keratinocytes, sebocytes, and dendritic cells.
Clinical presentation
Osteoarticular manifestations involve osteitis, hyperostosis,
synovitis, arthropathy, and enthesopathy that present
with pain, tenderness, and sometimes swelling over the
affected areas and fever.
Osteitis is the inflammation of
bone, which may involve the cortex and the medullary
cavity. Hyperostosis reflects excessive bone growth and
may result in enthesopathic new bone formation and joint
fusion (Fig. 1).
Synovitis mostly manifests as nonerosive
oligoarthritis of larger joints. Joint involvement can be
primary arthritis or an extension of the osteitis adjacent to
the articular structures. Arthritis has been reported in up to
92.5 % of SAPHO cases. The axial skeleton is involved in
91 % and the peripheral joints in 36 % of cases.
Besides
sternocostal and sternoclavicular joints, which are the most
commonly affected, it mainly affects the sacroiliac or hip
joints, knees, and ankles. For anterior chest wall disease,
three stages have been described (Table 1). The costoclavicular
ligament is involved in 48 % of cases, and it is
considered a decisive early finding in SAPHO [7, 32, 33].
The smallest number of cases in the literature are based
on temporomandibular joint involvement [11, 13, 34, 35].
The percentage distribution of arthritis in various parts of
the body is demonstrated schematically in Fig. 2.
Soft tissue surrounding joints and bones can be affected
as well. It may be misinterpreted as a neoplastic or lymphatic
mass [7, 36], and, although rare, the soft tissue
swelling can lead to serious complications, such as thoracic
outlet syndrome [11, 36–38].
Enthesopathy can lead to ligament ossification, which
can result in the development of bony bridging across
joints.
CRMO is an aseptic inflammatory disorder clinically
characterized with insidious onset of bone lesions with pain
and swelling that is often worse at night, with or without
fever. Swelling and warmth can occur over the affected
areas. It is most commonly found in the metaphyseal
regions of long bones of the lower extremities. Some other
sites, such as the clavicules, vertebral bodies, mandible,
pelvis, and small bones of the hands and feet, have been
shown to be affected as well. Involvement is multifocal,
usually unilateral, and it can be accompanied by skin
lesions (most often, palmoplantar pustulosis and psoriasis
have been described) [32, 39]. As stated earlier, some
investigators believe that CRMO is the pediatric presentation
of SAPHO, but it seems that the differentiating
clinical feature is mainly in the localization of inflammation:
in pediatric CRMO patients, the extremities are more
often affected and in SAPHO patients, the axial skeleton
with costosternoclavicular region is the focus [5].
Differential diagnosis
SAPHO must be differentiated from other diseases that cause bone pain, edema, and erythema.
Disease | Findings |
---|---|
Soft tissue infection (Commonly cellulitis) |
History of skin warmness, swelling and erythema. Bone probing is the definite way to differentiate them.[1][2] |
Osteonecrosis (Avascular necrosis of bone) |
Previous history of trauma, radiation, use of steroids or biphosphonates are suggestive to differentiate osteonecrosis from ostemyelitis.[3][4] MRI is diagnostic.[5][6] |
Charcot joint | Patients with Charcot joint commonly develop skin ulcerations that can in turn lead to secondary osteomyelitis. Contrast-enhanced MRI may be diagnostically useful if it shows a sinus tract, replacement of soft tissue fat, a fluid collection, or extensive marrow abnormalities. Bone biopsy is the definitive diagnostic modality.[7] |
Bone tumors | May present with local pain and radiographic changes consistent with osteomyelitis. Tumors most likely to mimic osteomyelitis are osteoid osteomas and chondroblastomas that produce small, round, radiolucent lesions on radiographs.[8] |
Gout | Gout presents with joint pain and swelling. Joint aspiration and crystals in synovial fluid is diagnostic for gout.[9] |
SAPHO syndrome (Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) |
SAPHO syndrome consists of a wide spectrum of neutrophilic dermatosis associated with aseptic osteoarticular lesions. It can mimic osteomyelitis in patients who lack the characteristic findings of pustulosis and synovitis. The diagnosis is established via clinical manifestations; bone culture is sterile in the setting of osteitis. |
Sarcoidosis | It involves most frequently the pulmonary parenchyma and mediastinal lymph nodes, but any organ system can be affected. Bone involvement is often bilateral and bones commonly affected include the middle and distal phalanges (producing “sausage finger”), wrist, skull, vertebral column, and long bones. |
Langerhans' cell histiocytosis | The disease usually manifests in the skeleton and solitary bone lesions are encountered twice as often as multiple bone lesions. The tumours can develop in any bone, but most commonly originate in the skull and jaw, followed by vertebral bodies, ribs, pelvis, and long bones.[10] |
Radiologic Findings
Radiographs may show expanded bone, sclerosis and
osteolysis, periosteal reaction, or enthesopathic new bone
formation. Bone scintigraphy delineates increased uptake
in affected bone and may reveal asymptomatic disease or
abnormalities not apparent on radiographs. The advantage
of scintigraphy is the demonstration of multiple sites of
involvement, so it is helpful for the elimination of malignancy
or infection. Symmetric uptake in the sternoclavicular
region with a typical ‘‘bull‘s head’’ appearance shown
in bone scintigraphy is characteristic of the SAPHO syndrome
(Fig. 3) [46]. It was first described by Freyschmidt
and Sternberg [47] but, even though it is considered to be
pathognomonic, it is not a very sensitive indicator of
SAPHO.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will also detect
occult lesions, may show findings not seen on plain
radiographs, and provide information about soft tissues.
Characteristic radiographic findings are hyperostosis and
osteitis. Hyperostosis is radiographically seen as diffuse
thickening of the periosteum, cortex, and endosteum, with
narrowing of the medullary canal [47]. Both are characterized
by increased bone sclerosis [35, 39].
In the early stages, the disease usually manifests as an
osteolytic process. As healing progresses, the lytic/sclerotic
picture is produced. Characteristic features of osteitis and
hyperostosis become more apparent with time [35].
Joint involvement is characterized by arthritis, with joint
space narrowing and, sometimes, erosions. There might be
periarticular osteopenia. Ligamentous ossifications can be
observed as well [32, 37].
Several spine lesions have been described regarding this
syndrome, and they include vertebral body corner lesions,
nonspecific spondylodiscitis and osteodestructive lesions
seen in adults and children, and osteosclerotic vertebral
lesions, paravertebral ossification, and sacroiliitis seen in
adults.
The term ‘‘corner lesion’’ describes focal cortical erosion
at one of the vertebral body corners, which is usually
seen in adults. Nonspecific spondylodiscitis is seen as focal
erosive changes with sclerosing remodeling of the vertebral
end plates, usually anteriorly located at the discovertebral
junction. This can be seen in up to 32 % of cases, and
single and multiple levels may be found [35]. Takigawa
et al. [14] observed nonconsecutive and consecutive multilevel
lesions, both at a proportion of 38 %. It may be
painful for many weeks but, usually, with time, it becomes
asymptomatic. Rarely it is a cause of neurological complications
or deformity [35].
Osteodestructive lesions include osteolytic vertebral
lesions, usually limited to one vertebrae, with a variable
degree of collapse. Collapse may induce kyphosis, spinal
canal stenosis, and spinal cord injury. If it is quite marked,
it can present as a vertebra plana in children, which is not
characteristic of an adult population [14]. Sacroiliitis can
be seen and it is usually unilateral. Ankylosis may be
present as well, and it is usually connected with the relief
of pain [7, 38, 48].
Affection of the long bones is commonly seen among
children. Predominantly, the metadiaphyses are affected,
especially the distal femur, and proximal and distal tibia.
Radiographically, it may manifest as lytic lesions, sclerotic
or mixed lesions, and periosteal reaction may eventually
develop. MRI is the technique of choice in young patients
suspected of SAPHO/CRMO, particularly due to the lack
of radiation requirements and its sensitivity in detecting
early subclinical lesions. It is seen as bone marrow edema,
which shows up as hypointense on T1 and hyperintense on
T2 signals in the affected metaphysis. As the disease progresses,
hypointense T1 and T2 signals in the medullary
space and cortex represent medullary sclerosis and cortical
thickening [17]. Lesions are usually multiple and often
symmetrical. Involvement of the adjacent epiphysis and
altered bone growth are rare [17, 35].
Many of the radiological manifestations of the disease
can be seen on plain radiographs. It is important to
emphasize that radiographs made during the first 3 months
of the disease course are normal in 80 % of cases and all
patients had abnormal radiographs at the end of follow-up
[38]. Similar findings were shown by Fritz et al. [49]. They
found that the sensitivity of conventional radiography in
the early stages of the disease is 13 % and, compared to
MRI, it shows only 16 % of the lesions seen on MRI. For
identifying subclinical foci, whole-body scintigraphy or
whole-body MRI is very useful. Actually, if initial radiographs
are negative and disease is suspected, bone scintigraphy
is used as the next step to detect occult
inflammatory lesions and clinically suspected localizations.
Because of increased cost, the use of whole-body MRI is
recommended for indeterminate cases, monitoring of disease
activity, and for better delineation of soft tissue
changes. Intravenous contrast will highlight abscesses and
other soft tissue changes that may be associated with more
aggressive conditions [17]. It should be kept in mind that
imaging procedures cannot accurately distinguish among
SAPHO/CRMO, malignancy, and osteomyelitis, and such
findings should always be interpreted within other clinical
and laboratory parameters.
Laboratory tests
There are no laboratory tests that are diagnostic of SAPHO.
They can be normal or may show elevated inflammatory
markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR),
C-reactive protein (CRP), and elevated levels of components
of complements C3 and C4. Mild leukocytosis and
mild anemia were observed as well. Compared to healthy
controls, these patients have elevated levels of immunoglobulin
A [2, 50]. A study searching for some specific
antibody profiles for those patients has been conducted
recently, but, unfortunately, without any success. Hurtado-
Nedelec et al. [30] showed significantly increased levels of
IgA in their cohort of 29 SAPHO patients, while the levels
of IgM and IgG were normal. This information can possibly
be used as an additional tool in making the diagnosis,
but further investigations need to be done. Also,
Histology
The histologic characteristics of the bone lesions change over the course of the disease. In the early stages, there is acute inflammation with a predominantly neutrophilic infiltrate, and both bone resorption and prominent periosteal bone formation have been described ([null 5], [null 42], [null 43]). In biopsy specimens from children with CRMO, multinucleated giant cells, granulomatous foci, and necrotic bone fragments have been observed ([null 5], [null 44]). Subsequently, the infiltrate consists of scattered lymphocytes, plasma cells, histiocytes, and only a few polymorphonuclear cells ([null 5], [null 42], [null 43]). Memory T lymphocytes of the CD8+ subset constitute the major cell type ([null 45]). In the late stages, the infiltrate is sparse or absent and enlarged sclerotic trabeculae as well as marrow fibrosis are observed. There are increased numbers of osteoblasts and occasionally osteoclasts as well ([null 5], [null 42], [null 43]).
Treatment
Because to the variety of clinical presentations, the treatment
of SAPHO syndrome remains a challenge and outcomes
are known to be disappointing, especially with the
skin component of the disease. There have been no randomized
controlled trials on the effectiveness of various
therapies, but nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs) are generally considered as the first-line treatment
option [4]. Antimicrobial therapy is useful in patients
with positive biopsy cultures, but it has little or no effect in
others. Successful treatment has been reported for doxycycline,
azithromycin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and
clindamycin [20, 55]. Azithromycin acts not only as an
antimicrobial, but also as an anti-inflammatory and
immunomodulatory drug, and Schilling and Wagner suggest
the simultaneous usage of azithromycin together with
calcitonin (osteotropic drug) [56]. Other treatment options
include colchicine, corticosteroids, bisphosphonates, and
disease-modifying agents, such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine,
and anti-TNFa therapy. Bisphosphonates act by
inhibiting bone resorption and turnover, and by possible
anti-inflammatory activity that suppresses the production
of IL-1, IL-6, and TNFa [57]. They have no effect on skin
lesions. Local corticosteroid injections have also been
tried, but this treatment modality has a significant effect
only on osteitis lesions [53]. Some authors used corticosteroids
orally and, in that case, they will act on both
skeletal and skin manifestations. Dermatologists use topical
corticosteroids, psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA)
photochemotherapy, and retinoids [58]. Disease-modifying
agents are only indicated when symptoms persist for at
least 4 weeks, despite adequate NSAID therapy. There is
increasing evidence of anti-TNFa usage in the treatment of
such patients. Case reports and case series on TNFa
blockade often demonstrate a marked improvement in the
clinical picture, regardless of whether or not this treatment
is permanently effective. The most often published cases in
the literature are about the use of infliximab in these
patients. Usually, 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 followed by
a 6–8-week interval has been used, just like that used in
spondyloarthropathies. Lower doses of infliximab and
reduction in the duration of intervals have been tested, but
it has been noted that decreased infusion intervals like in
spondyloarthropathies and lower dosages cannot maintain
the remission of disease [58]. Both skeletal and cutaneous
lesions responded well in most of the described cases, with
exception of PPP, which sometimes failed to respond. In
some cases, infliximab induced exacerbation of skin manifestation.
Arias-Santiago et al. [59] suggested adalimumab
as a possible alternative therapy in such cases, and there are
also reports on the successful treatment of SAPHO with
etanercept and the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra.
Anakinra appeared to be helpful in five out of six SAPHO
patients, two of which previously failed to respond to TNF
blockers [60]. Autologous bone transplantation using
microvascular flaps is applied as an experimental treatment
procedure [15].
Physiotherapy can always be used as an additional
treatment for osteoarticular manifestations. Surgery is
considered for patients whose condition has failed to
respond to all other therapeutic interventions [61]. Wide
resections are reserved to treat complications when patients
develop deformity or loss of function with pain [15]. There
are several reports in the literature about the surgical
treatment of such patients; for example, resection of the
medial clavicle or the sternoclavicular joint, which seemed
to provide variable improvement in pain, although some
authors report no improvement with this intervention [54].
Furthermore, mandibular involvement has been treated
with minor surgical procedures, such as decortications and
curettage, but extensive
References
- Skeletal Radiology. 2003 Jun;32(6):311-27.
- ↑ Bisno AL, Stevens DL (1996). "Streptococcal infections of skin and soft tissues". N. Engl. J. Med. 334 (4): 240–5. doi:10.1056/NEJM199601253340407. PMID 8532002.
- ↑ Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan SL, Montoya JG, Wade JC (2014). "Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the infectious diseases society of America". Clin. Infect. Dis. 59 (2): 147–59. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu296. PMID 24947530.
- ↑ Shigemura T, Nakamura J, Kishida S, Harada Y, Ohtori S, Kamikawa K, Ochiai N, Takahashi K (2011). "Incidence of osteonecrosis associated with corticosteroid therapy among different underlying diseases: prospective MRI study". Rheumatology (Oxford). 50 (11): 2023–8. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ker277. PMID 21865285.
- ↑ Slobogean GP, Sprague SA, Scott T, Bhandari M (2015). "Complications following young femoral neck fractures". Injury. 46 (3): 484–91. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.010. PMID 25480307.
- ↑ Amanatullah DF, Strauss EJ, Di Cesare PE (2011). "Current management options for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: part 1, diagnosis and nonoperative management". Am J. Orthop. 40 (9): E186–92. PMID 22022684.
- ↑ Etienne G, Mont MA, Ragland PS (2004). "The diagnosis and treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head". Instr Course Lect. 53: 67–85. PMID 15116601.
- ↑ Ahmadi ME, Morrison WB, Carrino JA, Schweitzer ME, Raikin SM, Ledermann HP (2006). "Neuropathic arthropathy of the foot with and without superimposed osteomyelitis: MR imaging characteristics". Radiology. 238 (2): 622–31. doi:10.1148/radiol.2382041393. PMID 16436821.
- ↑ Lovell, Wood (2014). Lovell and Winter's pediatric orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 978-1605478142.
- ↑ Joosten LA, Netea MG, Mylona E, Koenders MI, Malireddi RK, Oosting M, Stienstra R, van de Veerdonk FL, Stalenhoef AF, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Kanneganti TD, van der Meer JW (2010). "Engagement of fatty acids with Toll-like receptor 2 drives interleukin-1β production via the ASC/caspase 1 pathway in monosodium urate monohydrate crystal-induced gouty arthritis". Arthritis Rheum. 62 (11): 3237–48. doi:10.1002/art.27667. PMC 2970687. PMID 20662061.
- ↑ Picarsic J, Jaffe R (2015). "Nosology and Pathology of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis". Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 29 (5): 799–823. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2015.06.001. PMID 26461144.