Aortic dissection overview: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Historical Perspective== | ==Historical Perspective== | ||
Dr. Frank Nicholls described the first case of aortic dissection in 1761. Later, in 1819, Dr. René Laennec used the term dissecting aneurysm for the first time. The first successful surgical intervention for aortic dissection was done by Dr. Cooley and Dr. Creech in 1954. In 1965, Dr. DeBakey suggested the first classification system for aortic dissection. In 1970, a group of surgeons suggested the simplified classification system of Stanford. In 1996, an international, referral center was registered for acute aortic dissection with the goal of registering patients' presentation, treatment, and outcome. This registry provides information of more than 1500 patients with acute aortic dissection and may be used as a resource for this disorder. In 2006, another international registry was established in Germany for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) with the goal of collecting patients' information for structured follow-up. This registry with more than 2000 patients is now the largest database on AADA worldwide. | |||
==Classification== | ==Classification== | ||
Several different classification systems have been used to describe [[aortic]] dissections. The systems commonly in use are either based on either the [[anatomy]] of the dissection ([[proximal]], [[distal]]) or the duration of onset of [[symptom]]s ([[acute]], [[chronic]]) prior to presentation. DeBakey and Stanford's systems are commonly used [[classification]] systems for aortic dissection. European society of cardiology defined another [[classification]] system for aortic dissection in 2014. | |||
==Pathophysiology== | ==Pathophysiology== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
==Epidemiology and Demographics== | ==Epidemiology and Demographics== | ||
The [[incidence]] of aortic dissection is approximately 6 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.The [[incidence]] of aortic dissection increases with age, with a mean age of 63 years. Men are more commonly affected by aortic dissection than women. However, the [[prognosis]] tends to be worse in women due to unusual presentations. There is no [[racial]] predilection to aortic dissection. However, non-white [[race]] is associated with worse [[prognosis]]. The 30-days [[mortality rate]] of aortic dissection type A and B is approximately 47% and 13%, respectively. | |||
== Risk Factors == | == Risk Factors == | ||
| Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
==Diagnosis== | ==Diagnosis== | ||
===History and Symptoms=== | ===History and Symptoms=== | ||
History of [[patients]] with aortic dissection may be positive for factors such as [[connective tissue disease]], known [[aortic valve]] disease, recent [[heart surgery]], Known [[thoracic aortic aneurysm]], and family history of the [[aortic]] disease. Sudden onset [[Chest pain|chest]]/[[back pain]] is the most common [[symptom]] of aortic dissection. [[Pain]] may be of sharp, ripping, tearing, and knife-like quality. | |||
===Physical Examination=== | ===Physical Examination=== | ||
Revision as of 15:30, 14 December 2019
| https://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrbsxsadiwI%7C350}} |
|
Aortic dissection Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Special Scenarios |
|
Case Studies |
|
|
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]
Overview
Historical Perspective
Dr. Frank Nicholls described the first case of aortic dissection in 1761. Later, in 1819, Dr. René Laennec used the term dissecting aneurysm for the first time. The first successful surgical intervention for aortic dissection was done by Dr. Cooley and Dr. Creech in 1954. In 1965, Dr. DeBakey suggested the first classification system for aortic dissection. In 1970, a group of surgeons suggested the simplified classification system of Stanford. In 1996, an international, referral center was registered for acute aortic dissection with the goal of registering patients' presentation, treatment, and outcome. This registry provides information of more than 1500 patients with acute aortic dissection and may be used as a resource for this disorder. In 2006, another international registry was established in Germany for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) with the goal of collecting patients' information for structured follow-up. This registry with more than 2000 patients is now the largest database on AADA worldwide.
Classification
Several different classification systems have been used to describe aortic dissections. The systems commonly in use are either based on either the anatomy of the dissection (proximal, distal) or the duration of onset of symptoms (acute, chronic) prior to presentation. DeBakey and Stanford's systems are commonly used classification systems for aortic dissection. European society of cardiology defined another classification system for aortic dissection in 2014.
Pathophysiology
Aortic dissection begins as a tear in the aortic wall in > 95% of patients. The tear is usually transverse, extends through the intima and halfway through the media and involves ~50% of the aortic circumference. An inherent weakness in the tunica media layer predisposes patients to develop a tear in the intima layer. Two thirds of dissections originate in the ascending aorta, and 20% are in the proximal descending aorta.
Causes
Age-related changes due to atherosclerosis and uncontrolled hypertension are associated with spontaneous dissection, while blunt trauma injury and sudden deceleration in a motor vehicle accident is a major cause of aortic dissection.
Differentiating Aortic Dissection from other Diseases
Aortic dissection is a life threatening entity that must be distinguished from other life threatening entities such as cardiac tamponade, cardiogenic shock, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism. An aortic aneurysm is not synonymous with aortic dissection. Aneurysms are defined as a localized permanent dilation of the aorta to a diameter > 50% of normal. Aortic Intramural Hematoma can also progress to dissection if blood pressure is not well controlled,
Epidemiology and Demographics
The incidence of aortic dissection is approximately 6 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.The incidence of aortic dissection increases with age, with a mean age of 63 years. Men are more commonly affected by aortic dissection than women. However, the prognosis tends to be worse in women due to unusual presentations. There is no racial predilection to aortic dissection. However, non-white race is associated with worse prognosis. The 30-days mortality rate of aortic dissection type A and B is approximately 47% and 13%, respectively.
Risk Factors
Aging, atherosclerosis, diabetes, hypertension
Screening
Screening guidelines state that an EKG should be obtained for all patients who present with symptoms suspicious for aortic dissection. A chest x-ray should be obtained for patients determined to be in low-risk, and moderate-risk categories, and for patients in high-risk categories, TEE, CT Angiography or MRI Angiography should be obtained.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Aortic dissection carries a very poor prognosis. Type A dissection is associated with a worse prognosis than type B dissection. Aortic dissection can be complicated by extension to the coronary arteries resulting in myocardial infarction, involvement of the aortic arch to cause stroke, dilation of the route to cause aortic insufficiency, extension into the pericardium to cause pericardial tamponade, and heart failure, and aortic rupture.
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
History of patients with aortic dissection may be positive for factors such as connective tissue disease, known aortic valve disease, recent heart surgery, Known thoracic aortic aneurysm, and family history of the aortic disease. Sudden onset chest/back pain is the most common symptom of aortic dissection. Pain may be of sharp, ripping, tearing, and knife-like quality.
Physical Examination
Aortic dissection is commonly associated with varying blood pressure (pseudohypotension or hypertension or hypotension), wide pulse pressure (if the aortic root is involved causing aortic insufficiency), tachycardia, pulsus paradoxus, swollen face due to superior vena cava compression (superior vena cava syndrome). Radial-radial delay or radio-femoral delay (deficit) in pulse can be seen in patients depending on the location of dissection. Pulse deficit is commonly seen in females. In proximal dissections involving aortic root, aortic insufficiency is a complication, and on physical examination an early diastolic decrescendo murmur, which is best heard in the right second intercostal space is noted.
Laboratory Findings
Routine blood work is usually not helpful and should not delay definitive diagnostic studies such as a CT Angiography scan and treatment. Hemolysis can be present as a result of blood in the false lumen. The presence of an elevated CK MB may indicate the presence of concomitant acute myocardial infarction (often a right coronary artery occlusion due to occlusion of the ostium of the RCA by the dissection). Hematuria may be present and may indicate the presence of renal infarction.
Electrocardiogram
ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) due to occlusion by the dissection of the coronary artery at its ostium may be present. The right coronary artery tends to be involved more frequently than the left coronary artery. Electrical alternans may be present in the setting of a pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade should the dissection have extended into the pericardium.
Imaging in Acute Aortic Dissection
There are a wide variety of imaging studies that can be used to diagnose aortic dissection, but in general, transesophageal imaging is the imaging modality of choice in the acutely ill patient and CT Angiography, MRI is the imaging modality of choice in the assessment of longstanding aortic disease in a patient who has chronic chest pain who is hemodynamically stable or for the evaluation of a chronic dissection.
Chest X-ray
An increased aortic diameter is the most common finding on chest X ray, and is observed in up to 84% of patients. A widened mediastinum is the next most common finding, and is observed in 15-20% of patients. The chest X-Ray is normal in 17% of patients. A pleural effusion (hemothorax) in the absence of congestive heart failure can be another sign of aortic dissection.
CT
A CT scan can be used to diagnose aortic dissection if neither a TEE nor MRI is available in a timely fashion, or if there is a contraindication to their performance. An example would be after hours in an emergency room setting. If the results of the CT scan are non-diagnostic, then TEE or MRI should be performed to confirm the diagnosis.
MRI
MRI is the imaging modality of choice in the assessment of longstanding aortic disease in a patient who has chronic chest pain who is hemodynamically stable or for the evaluation of a chronic dissection.
Echocardiography
In the management of the acute patient with suspected aortic dissection, a transesophageal echo performed acutely in the emergency room is the preferred approach. If the patient is hemodynamically unstable, then a transesophageal echo can be performed in the operating room as the patient after the patient has been induced and is being prepared for surgery.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Type A dissections of the proximal aorta are generally managed with the operative repair. The repair can be done via open surgery vs endovascular repair depending on the extent of dissection. Type B dissections of the descending aorta are generally managed medically. Even patients who are undergoing operative repair require optimal medical management. The two goals in the medical management of aortic dissection are to reduce blood pressure and to reduce the oscillatory shear on the wall of the aorta (the shear-force dP/dt or force of ejection of blood from the left ventricle). The target blood pressure should be a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 60 to 75 mmHg. Aortic dissection is the only hypertensive emergency where target BP is less than 120/80 within the first four hours of presentation. Ideally, the target is to control the heart rate to less than 60 per minute. The first line of agents are beta-blockers, esmolol continuous infusion is used preferably as it is short-acting and works for blood pressure as well as heart rate. IV Labetalol or PO propranolol or metoprolol can also be used. The addition of other IV continuous nitroprusside can also be used.Cyanide toxicity is a concern when nitroprusside is used for more than 24 hours.
Surgery
Any dissection that involves the ascending aorta is considered a surgical emergency, and urgent surgical consultation is recommended. There is a 90% 3-month mortality among patients with a proximal aortic dissection who do not undergo surgery. These patients can rapidly develop acute aortic insufficiency (AI), tamponade or myocardial infarction (MI).
Secondary Prevention
Proper treatment and control of hardening of the arteries (atherosclerosis) and high blood pressure may reduce risk of aortic dissection. It is very important for patients at risk for dissection to tightly control their blood pressure. Taking safety precautions to prevent injuries can help prevent dissections. Many cases of aortic dissection cannot be prevented. If diagnosed with Marfan or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, regular follow-up is advisable.