Third degree AV block surgery

Third degree AV block Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Classification
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Third degree AV block from other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Electrocardiogram
X Ray
Echocardiography and Ultrasound
CT scan
MRI
Other Imaging Findings
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Primary Prevention
Secondary Prevention
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Third degree AV block surgery On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Third degree AV block surgery All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Third degree AV block surgery
CDC on Third degree AV block surgery
Third degree AV block surgery in the news
Blogs on Third degree AV block surgery
Directions to Hospitals Treating Third degree AV block
Risk calculators and risk factors for Third degree AV block surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3] Soroush Seifirad, M.D.[4]

Surgery

Implantation of permanent pacemakers in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients is usually done. Asymptomatic Mobitz II are prone to be converted to symptomatic or third degree heart AV block. Thus, they should be considered for a pacemaker even if asymptomatic.

Pacemaker Indications

Permanent pacemaker implantation indications in complete heart block include.

• Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and symptomatic bradycardia.
• Patients with acquired second-degree Mobitz type II heart block, third-degree atrioventricular block not attributable to reversible causes, require a permanent pacemaker regardless of symptoms.
• Patients with the following neuromuscular diseases with evidence of second-degree and third-degree atrioventricular block require permanent pacemaker regardless of the symptoms.
  • Myotonic dystrophy type 1
  • Kearns-Sayre Syndrome
• Patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block as a consequence of guideline-directed management for which there is no alternative treatment and continued treatment is clinically necessary; a permanent pacemaker is recommended to improve symptoms.
• Patients with infiltrative cardiomyopathies, such as cardiac sarcoidosis or amyloidosis, and second-degree Mobitz type II atrioventricular block, high-grade atrioventricular block, or third-degree atrioventricular block with a life expectancy of greater than one years; permanent pacemaker is reasonable.
• Patients with marked first-degree or second-degree Mobitz type 1 AV block with symptoms that are attributable to the atrioventricular block, permanent pacing is reasonable.
• Patients with alternating bundle branch block.
• Patients with Anderson-Fabry disease and QRS prolongation more significant than 110 ms with a meaning life expectancy greater than one year, a permanent pacemaker can be considered.
• Patients with postoperative sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block associated with persistent symptoms that do not resolve after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery, permanent pacing is recommended.
• Patients with postoperative sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block associated with persistent symptoms that do not resolve after mitral valve repair or replacement surgery, permanent pacing is recommended before discharge.
• Patients who have new postoperative sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block associated with persistent symptoms that do not resolve after aortic valve replacement, permanent pacing is recommended before discharge.
• Patients who have a new atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement associated with symptoms that do not resolve, permanent pacing is recommended.

Pacing Mode

VVI pacing mode was widely used in the past. But this mode has been shown to be associated with AV dyssynchrony leading to pacemaker syndrome. A dual chamber DDD pacemaker is preferred over a single chambered VVI pacemakers as it maintains physiologic AV synchrony. A dual-chamber artificial pacemaker is a type of device that typically listens for a pulse from the SA node and sends a pulse to the AV node at an appropriate interval, essentially completing the connection between the two nodes. Pacemakers in this role are usually programmed to enforce a minimum heart rate and to record instances of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation , two common secondary conditions that can accompany third degree AV block.