Premature rupture of membranes resident survival guide: Difference between revisions
Agnesrinky (talk | contribs) |
Agnesrinky (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
{{familytree | C01 | | | | C02 | C01= [[PROM]] ruled-out| C02= [[PROM]] confirmed}} | {{familytree | C01 | | | | C02 | C01= [[PROM]] ruled-out| C02= [[PROM]] confirmed}} | ||
{{familytree | | | | | | | |!| | | | }} | {{familytree | | | | | | | |!| | | | }} | ||
{{familytree | | | | | | | B01 | | | B01= Check [[gestational age]]<br>•Arrange transportation to [[tertiary care]] if possible<br>•Arrange prompt consult with [[obstetrician]]<br>•[[Non-stress test|Fetal non-stress test]] and [[ECG]] to assess well being}} | {{familytree | | | | | | | B01 | | | B01= <div style=" left; text-align: left; ">Check [[gestational age]]<br><br>•Arrange transportation to [[tertiary care]] if possible<br><br>•Arrange prompt consult with [[obstetrician]]<br><br>•[[Non-stress test|Fetal non-stress test]] and [[ECG]] to assess well being}} | ||
{{familytree | | | | | | | |!| | | | }} | {{familytree | | | | | | | |!| | | | }} | ||
{{ | {{Family tree| | | | | | | B02 | | | | | | | |B02= <div style="float: left; text-align: left; "> '''Indications for delivery :'''<br> | ||
{{ | ---- | ||
{{familytree | | | | ❑ Nonreassuring fetal status and chorioamnionitis.<br><br> | ||
❑ The decision for delivery depends on fetal status, amount of bleeding, the stability of mother, and gestational age.<br><br>❑ If the patient presents with vaginal bleeding, there may be a concern for a placental abruption and delivery should be considered. </div>| | | | | | | |}} | |||
{{Familytree| | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | |}} | |||
{{familytree | | | | | | {{familytree| | | | | | | A01 |A01= Management of PROM <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed";><div style="float: left; text-align: left; "><br> | ||
{{ | ❑ Patients with preterm PROM should be admitted to hospital and periodically assessed for infection, placental abruption, umbilical cord compression, fetal well-being and labor.<br><br> | ||
❑ Periodic ultrasound evaluation should be performed to monitor fetal growth and periodic fetal heart rate monitoring.<br><br> | |||
❑ Vital signs should be monitored and a rise in maternal temperature should raise suspicion for an intrauterine infection.<br><br> | |||
❑ Serial monitoring of leukocytes and inflammatory markers are not useful in diagnosing infection as they are nonspecific if there is no clinical evidence of infection. Administration of corticosteroids can cause a transient leukocytosis as well.<br><br> | |||
❑ Prophylactic tocolytics can cause a longer latency period and a lower risk of delivery within 48 hours. But it is associated with a higher risk of chorioamnionitis in pregnancies before 34 weeks of gestation.<br><br> | |||
❑ Antenatal corticosteroids after preterm PROM have been shown to reduce neonatal mortality, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage.<br><br> | |||
❑ Antibiotics prolong pregnancy, reduce maternal and neonatal infections, and reduce fetal morbidity.<br><br> | |||
{{ | ❑ Progesterone supplementation should be offered to reduce the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in a woman with previous history of PROM.<br><br>}} | ||
{{familytree | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | }} | |||
{{Family tree | | | | | | | B02 | | | | | | | |B02= <div style="float: left; text-align: left;"> '''PROM at less than 24 weeks :'''<br> | |||
---- | |||
❑ Patient counselling must be done and the should be advised about risks and benefits of expectant management and immediate delivery.<br> | |||
•Immediate delivery should be offered as an option<br> | |||
•Consider MFM and neonatology consultation<br><br> | |||
❑ If there is no signs of infection and patient wants expectant management <br> | |||
•Patient can be managed on a outpatient setting following inpatient assessment.<br> | |||
•She should be advised to return to hospital immediately if signs or symptoms of bleeding, labor or infection is noticed.<br> | |||
•Advise return to hospital at time of viability<br><br> | |||
❑ Antibiotics can offered as early as 20w0d <br><br> | |||
❑ A single course of corticosteroids can be given as early as 23w0d of due to risk of delivery within 7 days.<br><br> | |||
❑ Antenatal corticosteroids and latency antibiotics are recommended upon reaching viability<br><br> | |||
❑ GBS prophylaxis, Tocolysis and Neuroprotection (magnesium sulfate) can be considered as early as 23W0D, but these are not recommended prior to viability. | |||
</div>| | | | | | | |}} | |||
{{Family tree | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | |}} | |||
{{familytree/end}} | {{familytree/end}} | ||
Revision as of 08:38, 28 February 2021
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rinky Agnes Botleroo, M.B.B.S.
Synonyms and keywords:
Overview
This section provides a short and straight to the point overview of the disease or symptom. The first sentence of the overview must contain the name of the disease.
Causes
Common risk factors in the development of PROM include[1] :
- Maternal risk factors[1]:
- Sepsis
- Previous history of PROM, recurrence risk is 16%–32% as compared with 4% in women with a prior uncomplicated term delivery.[2]
- Chronic steroid therapy[3]
- Abnormal bleeding during the second trimester or late in the pregnancy.
- Low body mass index (BMI < 19.8 kg/m2)
- Smoking and drug abuse[2]
- Low socioeconomic status
- Deficiency of copper or vitamin C, along with connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus are also linked to increased risk of PROM.
- Direct abdominal trauma
- Preterm labor
- Anemia
- Uteroplacental Factors[1]:
- Uterine anomalies (such as uterine septum)
- Placental abruption
- Advanced cervical dilation (cervical insufficiency)
- Prior cervical conization
- Cervical shortening in the 2nd trimester (< 2.5 cm)
- Uterine overdistention (Polyhydramnios, Multiple pregnancy)
- Intra-amniotic infection (Chorioamnionitis)
- Multiple bimanual vaginal examinations (but not sterile speculum or transvaginal ultrasound examinations)
- Fetal factors include[1] :
- Multiple pregnancy ( preterm PROM complicates 7%–10% of twin pregnancies)
- Prematurity
- Infection
- Cord prolapse
- Malpresentation. [4]
Diagnosis
Shown below is an algorithm summarizing the diagnosis of
Pregnant woman comes with Premature rupture of membranes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Take complete history | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ask about previous obstetric history if she was previously pregnant : ❑ Ask about previous pregnancies including miscarriages and terminations. ❑ Length of gestation. ❑ Ask about mode of delivery. ❑ Ask if there was similar complaints during previous pregnancy? ❑ Was there any complications throughout the pregnancy or during delivery such as shoulder dystocia, postpartum haemorrhage ? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ask the following questions about menstrual history : ❑ Age of menarche ❑ Last menstrual period ❑ Is the menstrual flow normal? How many pads she has to use in a day? ❑ Is there any foul smell or colour change? ❑ How many days does the menstruation stay? ❑ Contraceptive history for example oral contraceptives, intrauterine device | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perform physical examination : ❑ Visualization of amniotic fluid (AF) leaking through the cervix.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If above are not conclusive, do the following tests : ❑ Ultrasound for AFV may be helpful but not diagnostic . | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusive test – dye instillation[5][6] : ❑ Intra-amniotic dye instillation is a helpful tool for evaluation of preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes and for genetic amniocentesis in multifetal gestation. Ultrasound guided dye is passed into the vagina and detected with tampon or pad stain.
❑ Indocyanine green has been used in pregnancy for other indications. ❑ Oral phenazopyridine hydrochloride may lead to a false-positive diagnosis of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.[5] ❑ Evans blue and methylene blue have adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes.[5] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment
Shown below is an algorithm summarizing the treatment of premature rupture of membranes .
History suggestive of PROM (leakage of fluid from the vagina) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Physical examination findings confirm PROM •Pooling of fluid •Positive nitrazine and Ferning tests | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sterile speculum examination assess dilation and ultrasound if indicated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROM ruled-out | PROM confirmed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Check gestational age •Arrange transportation to tertiary care if possible •Arrange prompt consult with obstetrician •Fetal non-stress test and ECG to assess well being | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indications for delivery : ❑ Nonreassuring fetal status and chorioamnionitis. ❑ If the patient presents with vaginal bleeding, there may be a concern for a placental abruption and delivery should be considered. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management of PROM ❑ Patients with preterm PROM should be admitted to hospital and periodically assessed for infection, placental abruption, umbilical cord compression, fetal well-being and labor. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROM at less than 24 weeks : ❑ Patient counselling must be done and the should be advised about risks and benefits of expectant management and immediate delivery. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Do's
- The content in this section is in bullet points.
Don'ts
- The content in this section is in bullet points.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Caughey AB, Robinson JN, Norwitz ER (2008). "Contemporary diagnosis and management of preterm premature rupture of membranes". Rev Obstet Gynecol. 1 (1): 11–22. PMC 2492588. PMID 18701929.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Ekwo EE, Gosselink CA, Woolson R, Moawad A (June 1993). "Risks for premature rupture of amniotic membranes". Int J Epidemiol. 22 (3): 495–503. doi:10.1093/ije/22.3.495. PMID 8359967.
- ↑ Polzin WJ, Brady K (December 1991). "Mechanical factors in the etiology of premature rupture of the membranes". Clin Obstet Gynecol. 34 (4): 702–14. doi:10.1097/00003081-199112000-00006. PMID 1778012.
- ↑ Naeye RL (1982). "Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal membranes". Obstet Gynecol. 60 (1): 93–8. PMID 7088456.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Ireland KE, Rodriguez EI, Acosta OM, Ramsey PS (June 2017). "Intra-amniotic Dye Alternatives for the Diagnosis of Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes". Obstet Gynecol. 129 (6): 1040–1045. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002056. PMID 28486367.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Adekola H, Gill N, Sakr S, Hobson D, Bryant D, Abramowicz JS, Soto E (2016). "Outcomes following intra-amniotic instillation with indigo carmine to diagnose prelabor rupture of membranes in singleton pregnancies: a single center experience". J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 29 (4): 544–9. doi:10.3109/14767058.2015.1015982. PMID 25714481.
- ↑ "Alternatives to Indigo Carmine When Diagnosis of PROM is Equivocal - The ObG Project".