Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome other imaging findings: Difference between revisions
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Other Imaging Findings== | ==Other Imaging Findings== | ||
PET scan can be a useful tool to minimize the number of lymph nodes to get biopsied.<ref name="RaoOliveira2011">{{cite journal|last1=Rao|first1=V. Koneti|last2=Oliveira|first2=João Bosco|title=How I treat autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome|journal=Blood|volume=118|issue=22|year=2011|pages=5741–5751|issn=0006-4971|doi=10.1182/blood-2011-07-325217}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 01:43, 4 July 2021
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome Microchapters |
Differentiating Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome from other Diseases |
---|
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome other imaging findings On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome other imaging findings |
FDA on Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome other imaging findings |
CDC on Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome other imaging findings |
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome other imaging findings in the news |
Blogs on Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome other imaging findings |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome other imaging findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing.
Overview
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) may be helpful in the diagnosis of Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome(ALPS) by distinguishing benign lymphadenopathy from malignant lymphadenopathy.
Other Imaging Findings
PET scan can be a useful tool to minimize the number of lymph nodes to get biopsied.[1]
References
- ↑ Rao, V. Koneti; Oliveira, João Bosco (2011). "How I treat autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome". Blood. 118 (22): 5741–5751. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-07-325217. ISSN 0006-4971.