Congestive heart failure chronic pharmacotherapy: Difference between revisions
Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
* Maintaining the euvolemia state is the aim of [[diuretic therapy]] with the lowest doses. | * Maintaining the euvolemia state is the aim of [[diuretic therapy]] with the lowest doses. | ||
* [[Patients]] should be trained to self-adjust their [[diuretic]] dose based on monitoring of symptoms/signs of [[congestion]] and daily [[weight]] measurements. | * [[Patients]] should be trained to self-adjust their [[diuretic]] dose based on monitoring of symptoms/signs of [[congestion]] and daily [[weight]] measurements. | ||
===[[Angiotensin II type I receptor blockers]]=== | |||
* [[ARBs]] are recommended for [[patients]] who cannot tolerate [[ACE-I]] or [[ARNI]] because of serious side effects. | |||
* [[CHARM-Alternative]] study showed [[candesartan]] reduced [[cardiovascular]] deaths and [[HF]] hospitalizations in [[patients]] who were not receiving an [[ACE-I]] due to previous intolerance. | |||
*In the [[Val-HeFT]] trial, [[Valsartan]], in addition to usual therapy, including [[ACE-I]], reduced [[HF]] hospitalizations . | |||
* [[ARB]]s have not re [[all-cause mortality]] in any trial. | |||
== Management of [[chronic heart failure]]== | == Management of [[chronic heart failure]]== |
Revision as of 12:13, 18 February 2022
Resident Survival Guide |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [2]
Overview
There are several goals in the chronic management of systolic heart failure. The management of diastolic heart failure is discussed elsewhere. One goal of therapy is to improve the patient's symptoms, exercise tolerance and quality of life. Diuretics, along with regular assessment of the patient's weight, minimizes fluid accumulation and the accompanying symptoms of dyspnea and orthopnea. Another goal is to reduce hospitalization and mortality. To achieve the second goal, patients with chronic heart failure should be administered an ACE inhibitor (or ARB if they are ACE intolerant) and a beta blocker. If the patient remains symptomatic, additional therapy may include an aldosterone antagonist.
Drugs recommended in all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Medications indicated in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA class II–IV) heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF <_40%)
Recommendations for screening sleep apnea in patients with bradycardia or conduction disorder |
(Class I, Level of Evidence A): |
❑ ACE-I is recommended for patients with HFrEF to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and death |
(Class I, Level of Evidence B): |
❑ Sacubitril/valsartan is recommended as a replacement for an ACE-I in patients with HFrEF to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and death |
The above table adopted from 2021 ESC Guideline |
---|
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
- ACE-Is are the first class of drugs that reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with HFrEF and improve symptoms.
- ACEI should be Uptitrated to the maximum tolerated recommended dose.
Beta-blockers
- Beta-blockers can reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with HFrEF, in addition to treatment with an ACE-I and diuretic and also improve symptoms.
- In symptomatic heart failure, ACE-I and beta-blockers can be used in combination.
- Initiation of a beta-blocker before an ACE-I and vice versa are not recommended.[2]
- Beta-blockers should be initiated in clinically stable, euvolaemic, patients at a low dose and gradually titrated to the maximum tolerated dose.
- After stability of hemodynamic in patients admitted with acute heart failure, beta-blockers should be cautiously initiated in hospital
- Use of betablocker in patients with HFrEF with AF was not associated with reduction in mortality or hospital admission.
MRA or Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
- In all patients with HFrEF, MRAs (spironolactone or eplerenone) are recommended, in addition to an ACE-I and a beta-blocker, to reduce mortality and the risk of heart failure hospitalization.[3]
- MRAs improve symptoms.
- MRAs block receptors that bind aldosterone and also other steroid hormones (corticosteroid and androgen) receptors.
- Eplerenone is more specific for aldosterone blockade and, therefore, causes less gynaecomastia.
- In patients with impaired renal function and in those with serum potassium concentrations >5.0 mmol/L, MRA should be used with causion.
Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor
- In the PARADIGM-HF trial, sacubitril/valsartan, an ARNI, was superior to enalapril in reducing hospitalizations for worsening HF, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in patients with ambulatory HFrEF with LVEF <_40% (changed to <_35% during the study).[4]
- Patients with elevated plasma NP concentrations, an eGFR >_30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and were able to tolerate enalapril and then sacubitril/valsartan.
- Use of sacubitril/valsartan was associated with improvement in symptoms and quality of life a reduction in the incidence of diabetes requiring insulin treatment,[5]
and a reduction in the decline in eGFR [6]as well as a reduced rate of hyperkalemia[7].
- In addition, the need for loop diuretic reduced while using of sacubitril/valsartan.[8]
- Common side effect of sacubitril/valsartan is symptomatic hypotension as compared to enalapril, but despite developing hypotension, these patients also gained clinical benefits from sacubitril/valsartan therapy.
- The recommendation is that an ACE-I or ARB is replaced by sacubitril/valsartan in ambulatory patients with HFrEF, who remain symptomatic despite optimal treatment.
- Two studies have shown the use of ARNI in hospitalized patients with adequate blood pressure (BP), and an eGFR >_30 mL/min/1.73 m2, without previously treated with ACE-I, was associated with reduced subsequent cardiovascular death or HF hospitalizations.[9][10]
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors
- The result of DAPA-HF trial showed the long-term effects of dapagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor) compared to placebo in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT), on morbidity and mortality in patients with NYHA class II-IV, and had an LVEF <_40%.[11]
- Elevated plasma NT-proBNP and an eGFR >_30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were needed to initiation of therapy.
- Benefits of dapagliflozin in heart failure including:
- Reduction in worsening HF (hospitalization)
- Reduction in cardiovascular death.
- Reduction in all-cause mortality
- Alleviated HF symptomS
- Improvement of physical function and quality of life in patients with symptomatic HFrEF
- Benefits were seen early after the initiation of dapagliflozin.
- Survival benefits were seen in patients with HFrEF with and without diabetes.
- EMPEROR-Reduced trial investigated that empagliflozin reduced the combined primary endpoint of CV death or HF hospitalization by 25% in patients with NYHA class II-IV symptoms, and an LVEF <_40% despiteOMT and eGFR >20 mL/min/1.73 m2.
- Reduction in the decline in eGFR and improvement in quality of life among patients receiving empagliflozin were also found.[12]
- Dapagliflozin or empagliflozin are recommended, in addition to OMT with an ACE-I/ARNI, a beta-blocker and an MRA, for patients with HFrEF regardless of diabetes status.
- The need for diuretic may be reduced due to The diuretic/natriuretic properties of SGLT2 inhibitors and reducing congestion.[13]
- The combined SGLT-1 and SGLT-2 inhibitors, sotagliflozin, has also been investigated in patients with diabetes who were hospitalized with HF.[14]
- Side effects of SGLT2 inhibitors including:
- A small reversible reduction in eGFR following initiation
Other medications in HFrEF in patients with NYHA 2-4
Recommendations for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and NYHA 2-4 |
Loop diuretics (Class I, Level of Evidence C): |
❑ Loop diuretics are recommended in patients with HFrEF with signs and/or symptoms of congestion to improve HF symptoms, exercise
capacity, and reduce HF hospitalizations |
ARB (Class I, Level of Evidence B): |
❑ ARB is recommended in symptomatic patients to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death for whom unable to tolerate an ACE-I or ARNI (patients should also receive a beta-blocker and MRA) |
If-channel inhibitor :(Class IIa, Level of Evidence B) : |
❑Ivabradine should be considered in symptomatic patients with LVEF <_35%, sinus rhythm on ECG and a resting heart rate >_70 b.p.m despite treatment with maximum tolerated beta-blocker, ACE-I/(or ARNI), and an MRA, to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death |
If-channel inhibitor : (Class IIa, Level of Evidence C) |
❑ Ivabradine should be considered in symptomatic patients with LVEF <_35%, in sinus rhythm and a resting heart rate >_70 b.p.m. who are unable to tolerate
or have contraindications for a beta-blocker to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and CV death. Patients should also receive an ACE-I (or ARNI) and MRA |
Soluble guanylate cyclase receptor stimulator: (Class IIb, Level of Evidence B) |
❑ Vericiguat may be considered in patients in NYHA class II-IV with worsening HF despite therapy with an ACE-I (or ARNI), a beta-blocker and MRA to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization |
Hydralazine, isosorbide dinitrate : (Class IIa, Level of Evidence B) |
❑ Hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate should be considered in black patients with LVEF <_35% or with an LVEF <45% combined with a dilated left ventricle in NYHA class III-IV despite therapy with an ACE-I (or ARNI), a beta-blocker and an MRA to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and death.1 |
Hydralazine, isosorbide dinitrate (Class IIb, Level of Evidence B): |
❑ Hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate may be considered in patients with symptomatic HFrEF who unable to tolerate any of an ACE-I, an ARB, or
ARNI (or they are contraindicated) to reduce the risk of death |
Digoxin: (ClassIIb, Level of Evidence B) |
❑ Digoxin may be considered in patients with symptomatic HFrEF in sinus rhythm despite treating with an ACE-I (or ARNI), a beta- blocker and an MRA, to reduce the risk of hospitalization (both all-cause and HF hospitalizations) |
The above table adopted from 2021 ESC Guideline |
---|
Diuretics
- Loop diuretics is recommended to reduce the signs and/or symptoms of congestion in patients with HFrEF.
- The effects of diuretics on morbidity and mortality have not been studied in RCTs.
- Loop diuretics and thiazide diuretics appear to reduce the risk of death and worsening HF compared with a placebo.
- Diuretics can improve exercise capacity.
- Loop diuretics and thiazides act synergistically and may be used to treat diuretic resistance.
- ARNI, MRAs, and SGLT2 inhibitors may also possess diuretic properties.
- Maintaining the euvolemia state is the aim of diuretic therapy with the lowest doses.
- Patients should be trained to self-adjust their diuretic dose based on monitoring of symptoms/signs of congestion and daily weight measurements.
Angiotensin II type I receptor blockers
- ARBs are recommended for patients who cannot tolerate ACE-I or ARNI because of serious side effects.
- CHARM-Alternative study showed candesartan reduced cardiovascular deaths and HF hospitalizations in patients who were not receiving an ACE-I due to previous intolerance.
- In the Val-HeFT trial, Valsartan, in addition to usual therapy, including ACE-I, reduced HF hospitalizations .
- ARBs have not re all-cause mortality in any trial.
Management of chronic heart failure
Serial clinical evaluation , titration of Medications
Intensification 2-4 months, (1-4 weeks cycles)
- In the presence of volume overload, adjusting diuretic dose and reevaluation in 1-2 weeks
- In the setting of stable euvolumic status, medications initiation, increase, switch dose and follow-up in 1-2 weeks and checking basic metabolites panel, repeating cycles until no change in clinical status and reached appropriate titration
Assessment of response to medications and cardiac remodeling
- Repeating BNP, pro BNP and basic metabolic panel
- Pepeating ECG, Echocardiography
- Refferal eligible patients to electrophysiology specialist for CRT or ICD implantation
Lack of response, instability
- Referral to advanced heart failure specialist if there are:
- Use of IV inotropes
- NYHA 3B, 4, or persistently high level of natrioretic peptide
- End organ dysfunction
- LVEF ≤ 35%
- Defibrillator shocks
- Hospitalization > 1 day
- Edema despite increase dose of diuretics
- Low blood pressure, high heart rate
- Intolerance to medications
Assessment of response to medications
- Repeating laboratory tests such as NT pro BNP, BNP, electrolytes
- Repeating ECG
- Repeating echocardiography for evaluation of structure, function
- Referral to electrophysiologic for implantation of ICD, CRT in eligible patients
- Shown below is an image that summarizes the steps in the chronic management of patients with heart failure.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland J, Coats A, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam C, Lyon AR, McMurray J, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano G, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A (September 2021). "2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure". Eur Heart J. 42 (36): 3599–3726. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. PMID 34447992 Check
|pmid=
value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help) - ↑ Willenheimer R, van Veldhuisen DJ, Silke B, Erdmann E, Follath F, Krum H, Ponikowski P, Skene A, van de Ven L, Verkenne P, Lechat P (October 2005). "Effect on survival and hospitalization of initiating treatment for chronic heart failure with bisoprolol followed by enalapril, as compared with the opposite sequence: results of the randomized Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) III". Circulation. 112 (16): 2426–35. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.582320. PMID 16143696.
- ↑ Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J (September 1999). "The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators". N Engl J Med. 341 (10): 709–17. doi:10.1056/NEJM199909023411001. PMID 10471456.
- ↑ McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, Rouleau JL, Shi VC, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Zile MR (September 2014). "Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure". N Engl J Med. 371 (11): 993–1004. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1409077. PMID 25176015.
- ↑ Seferovic JP, Claggett B, Seidelmann SB, Seely EW, Packer M, Zile MR, Rouleau JL, Swedberg K, Lefkowitz M, Shi VC, Desai AS, McMurray J, Solomon SD (May 2017). "Effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on glycaemic control in patients with heart failure and diabetes: a post-hoc analysis from the PARADIGM-HF trial". Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 5 (5): 333–340. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30087-6. PMC 5534167. PMID 28330649. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
- ↑ Damman K, Gori M, Claggett B, Jhund PS, Senni M, Lefkowitz MP, Prescott MF, Shi VC, Rouleau JL, Swedberg K, Zile MR, Packer M, Desai AS, Solomon SD, McMurray J (June 2018). "Renal Effects and Associated Outcomes During Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure". JACC Heart Fail. 6 (6): 489–498. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2018.02.004. PMID 29655829. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
- ↑ Desai AS, Vardeny O, Claggett B, McMurray JJ, Packer M, Swedberg K, Rouleau JL, Zile MR, Lefkowitz M, Shi V, Solomon SD (January 2017). "Reduced Risk of Hyperkalemia During Treatment of Heart Failure With Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists by Use of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial". JAMA Cardiol. 2 (1): 79–85. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4733. PMID 27842179.
- ↑ Vardeny O, Claggett B, Kachadourian J, Desai AS, Packer M, Rouleau J, Zile MR, Swedberg K, Lefkowitz M, Shi V, McMurray J, Solomon SD (March 2019). "Reduced loop diuretic use in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril: the PARADIGM-HF trial". Eur J Heart Fail. 21 (3): 337–341. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1402. PMC 6607492 Check
|pmc=
value (help). PMID 30741494. Vancouver style error: initials (help) - ↑ DeVore AD, Braunwald E, Morrow DA, Duffy CI, Ambrosy AP, Chakraborty H, McCague K, Rocha R, Velazquez EJ (February 2020). "Initiation of Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition After Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Secondary Analysis of the Open-label Extension of the PIONEER-HF Trial". JAMA Cardiol. 5 (2): 202–207. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4665. PMC 6990764 Check
|pmc=
value (help). PMID 31825471. - ↑ Wachter R, Senni M, Belohlavek J, Straburzynska-Migaj E, Witte KK, Kobalava Z, Fonseca C, Goncalvesova E, Cavusoglu Y, Fernandez A, Chaaban S, Bøhmer E, Pouleur AC, Mueller C, Tribouilloy C, Lonn E, A L Buraiki J, Gniot J, Mozheiko M, Lelonek M, Noè A, Schwende H, Bao W, Butylin D, Pascual-Figal D (August 2019). "Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in haemodynamically stabilised heart failure patients in hospital or early after discharge: primary results of the randomised TRANSITION study". Eur J Heart Fail. 21 (8): 998–1007. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1498. PMID 31134724. Vancouver style error: missing comma (help)
- ↑ McMurray J, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Anand IS, Bělohlávek J, Böhm M, Chiang CE, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, Desai AS, Diez M, Drozdz J, Dukát A, Ge J, Howlett JG, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Ljungman C, Merkely B, Nicolau JC, O'Meara E, Petrie MC, Vinh PN, Schou M, Tereshchenko S, Verma S, Held C, DeMets DL, Docherty KF, Jhund PS, Bengtsson O, Sjöstrand M, Langkilde AM (November 2019). "Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction". N Engl J Med. 381 (21): 1995–2008. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1911303. PMID 31535829. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
- ↑ Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, Januzzi J, Verma S, Tsutsui H, Brueckmann M, Jamal W, Kimura K, Schnee J, Zeller C, Cotton D, Bocchi E, Böhm M, Choi DJ, Chopra V, Chuquiure E, Giannetti N, Janssens S, Zhang J, Gonzalez Juanatey JR, Kaul S, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Merkely B, Nicholls SJ, Perrone S, Pina I, Ponikowski P, Sattar N, Senni M, Seronde MF, Spinar J, Squire I, Taddei S, Wanner C, Zannad F (October 2020). "Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure". N Engl J Med. 383 (15): 1413–1424. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2022190. PMID 32865377 Check
|pmid=
value (help). - ↑ Jackson AM, Dewan P, Anand IS, Bělohlávek J, Bengtsson O, de Boer RA, Böhm M, Boulton DW, Chopra VK, DeMets DL, Docherty KF, Dukát A, Greasley PJ, Howlett JG, Inzucchi SE, Katova T, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Langkilde AM, Lindholm D, Ljungman C, Martinez FA, O'Meara E, Sabatine MS, Sjöstrand M, Solomon SD, Tereshchenko S, Verma S, Jhund PS, McMurray J (September 2020). "Dapagliflozin and Diuretic Use in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction in DAPA-HF". Circulation. 142 (11): 1040–1054. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047077. PMC 7664959 Check
|pmc=
value (help). PMID 32673497 Check|pmid=
value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help) - ↑ Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Steg PG, Cannon CP, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Lewis JB, Riddle MC, Voors AA, Metra M, Lund LH, Komajda M, Testani JM, Wilcox CS, Ponikowski P, Lopes RD, Verma S, Lapuerta P, Pitt B (January 2021). "Sotagliflozin in Patients with Diabetes and Recent Worsening Heart Failure". N Engl J Med. 384 (2): 117–128. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2030183. PMID 33200892 Check
|pmid=
value (help).