Cavernous angioma MRI: Difference between revisions

	Cavernous angioma Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Cavernous angioma from other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
CT
MRI
MRA
Other Imaging Findings
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Cavernous angioma MRI On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cavernous angioma MRI All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Cavernous angioma MRI
CDC on Cavernous angioma MRI
Cavernous angioma MRI in the news
Blogs on Cavernous angioma MRI
Directions to Hospitals Treating Cavernous angioma
Risk calculators and risk factors for Cavernous angioma MRI

Revision as of 10:16, 11 March 2022

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]<nowiki>; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Edzel Lorraine Co, D.M.D., M.D.

Diagnosis can be made through incidental findings from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening. A gradient-echo sequence should be utilized to unmask punctate lesions which can go undetected. These lesions are more visible on FLAIR imaging than on T2 weighing. As compared to T2 weighing, FLAIR imaging has more suppression of free-flowing fluid signals.

Popcorn-like, smoothly circumscribed, well-delineated complex lesions.^[1]
The core is formed by multiple foci of mixed-signal intensities, which represents hemorrhage in various stages of evolution.
The heterogeneous core typically is surrounded completely by a low-signal-intensity hemosiderin rim on T1-weighted images. The hypointensity of this rim becomes more prominent, or blooms, on T2-weighted and gradient-refocused images because of the magnetic susceptibility effects.
Smaller cavernous malformations may appear as focal hypointense nodules with both T1- and T2-weighted sequences. The small lesions are depicted more clearly and are more numerous on gradient-echo images because of the increased susceptibility effects of the sequences.

↑ Rafee S, Killeen RP, Tubridy N (2021). "'Popcorn' in the Brain: A Cause for Confusion". Am J Med. 134 (2): 216–217. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.09.014. PMID 33091393 Check |pmid= value (help).

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Overview==
-Diagnosis is most commonly made accidentally by routine [[magnetic resonance imaging]] (MRI) screening, but not all MRI exams are created equal. It is paramount that the patient requests a gradient-echo sequence in order to unmask small or punctate lesions which may otherwise remain undetected. These lesions are also more conspicuous on [[FLAIR]] imaging compared to standard T2 weighing. FLAIR imaging is different from Gradient sequences, rather, it is similar to T2 weighing but suppresses free-flowing fluid signal. Sometimes quiescent CCMs can be revealed as incidental findings during MRI exams ordered for other reasons.
+[[Diagnosis]] can be made through [[incidental findings]] from [[magnetic resonance imaging]] ([[MRI]]) [[screening]]. A [[gradient-echo sequence]] should be utilized to unmask [[punctate lesions]] which can go undetected. These [[lesions]] are more visible on [[FLAIR imaging]] than on [[T2 weighing]]. As compared to T2 weighing, [[FLAIR imaging]] has more suppression of [[free-flowing fluid signals]].
 ==MRI==