16 Personality Factors: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Adeeljamil (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Adeeljamil (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Deferential, cooperative, avoids conflict, submissive, humble, obedient, easily led, docile, accommodating (Submissiveness) | | Deferential, cooperative, avoids conflict, submissive, humble, obedient, easily led, docile, accommodating (Submissiveness) | ||
| align="center"| | | align="center"| Dominance (biology)|Dominance<br>(E) | ||
| Dominant, forceful, assertive, aggressive, competitive, stubborn, bossy (''Dominance'') | | Dominant, forceful, assertive, aggressive, competitive, stubborn, bossy (''Dominance'') | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Serious, restrained, prudent, taciturn, introspective, silent (''Desurgency'') | | Serious, restrained, prudent, taciturn, introspective, silent (''Desurgency'') | ||
| align="center"| Liveliness<br>(F) | | align="center"| Liveliness<br>(F) | ||
| Lively, animated, spontaneous, enthusiastic, happy go lucky, cheerful, expressive, impulsive ('' | | Lively, animated, spontaneous, enthusiastic, happy go lucky, cheerful, expressive, impulsive (''Surgency'') | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Expedient, nonconforming, disregards rules, self indulgent (''Low Super Ego Strength'') | | Expedient, nonconforming, disregards rules, self indulgent (''Low Super Ego Strength'') | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
==Origins== | ==Origins== | ||
In 1936 | In 1936 Gordon Allport and H.S. Odbert hypothesized that: | ||
{{cquote|Those individual differences that are most salient and socially relevant in people’s lives will eventually become encoded into their language; the more important such a difference, the more likely is it to become expressed as a single word.}} | {{cquote|Those individual differences that are most salient and socially relevant in people’s lives will eventually become encoded into their language; the more important such a difference, the more likely is it to become expressed as a single word.}} | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
This statement has become known as the '''Lexical Hypothesis'''. | This statement has become known as the '''Lexical Hypothesis'''. | ||
Allport and Odbert had worked through two of the most comprehensive | Allport and Odbert had worked through two of the most comprehensive dictionary|dictionaries of the English language available at the time, and extracted 18,000 personality-describing words. From this gigantic list they extracted 4500 personality-describing adjectives which they considered to describe observable and relatively permanent traits. | ||
In 1946 Raymond Cattell used the emerging technology of | In 1946 Raymond Cattell used the emerging technology of computers to analyse the Allport-Odbert list. He organized the list into 181 clusters and asked subjects to rate people whom they knew by the adjectives on the list. Using [[factor analysis]] Cattell generated twelve factors, and then included four factors which he thought ought to appear. The result was the hypothesis that individuals describe themselves and each other according to sixteen different, independent factors. | ||
With these sixteen factors as a basis, Cattell went on to construct the 16PF Personality Questionnaire, which remains in use by universities and businesses for research, personnel selection and the like. Although subsequent research has failed to replicate his results, and it has been shown that he retained too many factors, the current 16PF takes these findings into account and is considered to be a very good test. In 1963, [[Big Five personality traits|W.T. Norman]] replicated Cattell’s work and suggested that five factors would be sufficient. | With these sixteen factors as a basis, Cattell went on to construct the 16PF Personality Questionnaire, which remains in use by universities and businesses for research, personnel selection and the like. Although subsequent research has failed to replicate his results, and it has been shown that he retained too many factors, the current 16PF takes these findings into account and is considered to be a very good test. In 1963, [[Big Five personality traits|W.T. Norman]] replicated Cattell’s work and suggested that five factors would be sufficient. | ||
Revision as of 20:06, 13 April 2009
Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [1] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
The 16 Personality Factors, measured by the 16PF Questionnaire, were multivariately-derived by psychologist Raymond Cattell.
Below is a table outlining this model.
Raymond Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
| Descriptors of Low Range | Primary Factor | Descriptors of High Range |
|---|---|---|
| Impersonal, distant, cool, reserved, detached, formal, aloof (Schizothymia) | Warmth (A) |
Warm, outgoing, attentive to others, kindly, easy-going, participating, likes people (Affectothymia) |
| Concrete thinking, lower general mental capacity, less intelligent, unable to handle abstract problems (Lower Scholastic Mental Capacity) | Reasoning (B) |
Abstract-thinking, more intelligent, bright, higher general mental capacity, fast learner (Higher Scholastic Mental Capacity) |
| Reactive emotionally, changeable, affected by feelings, emotionally less stable, easily upset (Lower Ego Strength) | Emotional Stability (C) |
Emotionally stable, adaptive, mature, faces reality calmly (Higher Ego Strength) |
| Deferential, cooperative, avoids conflict, submissive, humble, obedient, easily led, docile, accommodating (Submissiveness) | Dominance (biology)|Dominance (E) |
Dominant, forceful, assertive, aggressive, competitive, stubborn, bossy (Dominance) |
| Serious, restrained, prudent, taciturn, introspective, silent (Desurgency) | Liveliness (F) |
Lively, animated, spontaneous, enthusiastic, happy go lucky, cheerful, expressive, impulsive (Surgency) |
| Expedient, nonconforming, disregards rules, self indulgent (Low Super Ego Strength) | Rule-Consciousness (G) |
Rule-conscious, dutiful, conscientious, conforming, moralistic, staid, rule bound (High Super Ego Strength) |
| Shy, threat-sensitive, timid, hesitant, intimidated (Threctia) | Social Boldness (H) |
Socially bold, venturesome, thick skinned, uninhibited (Parmia) |
| Utilitarian, objective, unsentimental, tough minded, self-reliant, no-nonsense, rough (Harria) | Sensitivity (I) |
Sensitive, aesthetic, sentimental, tender minded, intuitive, refined (Premsia) |
| Trusting, unsuspecting, accepting, unconditional, easy (Alaxia) | Vigilance (L) |
Vigilant, suspicious, skeptical, distrustful, oppositional (Protension) |
| Grounded, practical, prosaic, solution oriented, steady, conventional (Praxernia) | Abstractedness (M) |
Abstract, imaginative, absent minded, impractical, absorbed in ideas (Autia) |
| Forthright, genuine, artless, open, guileless, naive, unpretentious, involved (Artlessness) | Privateness (N) |
Private, discreet, nondisclosing, shrewd, polished, worldly, astute, diplomatic (Shrewdness) |
| Self-Assured, unworried, complacent, secure, free of guilt, confident, self satisfied (Untroubled) | Apprehension (O) |
Apprehensive, self doubting, worried, guilt prone, insecure, worrying, self blaming (Guilt Proneness) |
| Traditional, attached to familiar, conservative, respecting traditional ideas (Conservatism) | Openness to Change (Q1) |
Open to change, experimental, liberal, analytical, critical, free thinking, flexibility (Radicalism) |
| Group-oriented, affiliative, a joiner and follower dependent (Group Adherence) | Self-Reliance (Q2) |
Self-reliant, solitary, resourceful, individualistic, self sufficient (Self-Sufficiency) |
| Tolerates disorder, unexacting, flexible, undisciplined, lax, self-conflict, impulsive, careless of social rules, uncontrolled (Low Integration) | Perfectionism (Q3) |
Perfectionistic, organized, compulsive, self-disciplined, socially precise, exacting will power, control, self-sentimental (High Self-Concept Control) |
| Relaxed, placid, tranquil, torpid, patient, composed low drive (Low Ergic Tension) | Tension (Q4) |
Tense, high energy, impatient, driven, frustrated, over wrought, time driven. (High Ergic Tension) |
| Primary Factors and Descriptors in Cattell's 16 Personality Factor Model (Adapted From Conn & Rieke, 1994). | ||
Cattell referred to these 16 factors as primary factors, as opposed to the so-called "Big Five" factors which he considered global factors. All of the primary factors correlate with global factors and could therefore be considered subfactors within them.
Origins
In 1936 Gordon Allport and H.S. Odbert hypothesized that:
| “ | Those individual differences that are most salient and socially relevant in people’s lives will eventually become encoded into their language; the more important such a difference, the more likely is it to become expressed as a single word. | ” |
This statement has become known as the Lexical Hypothesis.
Allport and Odbert had worked through two of the most comprehensive dictionary|dictionaries of the English language available at the time, and extracted 18,000 personality-describing words. From this gigantic list they extracted 4500 personality-describing adjectives which they considered to describe observable and relatively permanent traits.
In 1946 Raymond Cattell used the emerging technology of computers to analyse the Allport-Odbert list. He organized the list into 181 clusters and asked subjects to rate people whom they knew by the adjectives on the list. Using factor analysis Cattell generated twelve factors, and then included four factors which he thought ought to appear. The result was the hypothesis that individuals describe themselves and each other according to sixteen different, independent factors.
With these sixteen factors as a basis, Cattell went on to construct the 16PF Personality Questionnaire, which remains in use by universities and businesses for research, personnel selection and the like. Although subsequent research has failed to replicate his results, and it has been shown that he retained too many factors, the current 16PF takes these findings into account and is considered to be a very good test. In 1963, W.T. Norman replicated Cattell’s work and suggested that five factors would be sufficient.
See also
- 16PF Questionnaire
- Big Five personality traits
- Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
- Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Personality Inventory (NEO-PI)
- Trait theory
- Socionics
- Enneagram of personality
References
- Cattell, R. B. (1946). The description and measurement of personality. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
- Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation structure and measurement. New York: World Book.
- Conn, S.R., & Rieke, M.L. (1994a). The 16PF Fifth Edition technical manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.
- Russell, M.T., & Karol, D. (2002). 16PF Fifth Edition administrator’s manual