Risk factor: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:26, 23 March 2010
WikiDoc Resources for Risk factor |
Articles |
---|
Most recent articles on Risk factor Most cited articles on Risk factor |
Media |
Powerpoint slides on Risk factor |
Evidence Based Medicine |
Clinical Trials |
Ongoing Trials on Risk factor at Clinical Trials.gov Clinical Trials on Risk factor at Google
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt |
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Risk factor
|
Books |
News |
Commentary |
Definitions |
Patient Resources / Community |
Patient resources on Risk factor Discussion groups on Risk factor Patient Handouts on Risk factor Directions to Hospitals Treating Risk factor Risk calculators and risk factors for Risk factor
|
Healthcare Provider Resources |
Causes & Risk Factors for Risk factor |
Continuing Medical Education (CME) |
International |
|
Business |
Experimental / Informatics |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
Overview
A risk factor is a variable associated with an increased risk of disease or infection. Risk factors are correlational and not necessarily causal, because correlation does not imply causation. For example, being young cannot be said to cause measles, but young people are more at risk as they are less likely to have developed immunity during a previous epidemic.
Risk factors are evaluated by comparing the risk of those exposed to the potential risk factor to those not exposed. Let's say that at a wedding, 74 people ate the chicken and 22 of them were ill, while of the 35 people who had the fish or vegetarian meal only 2 were ill. Did the chicken make the people ill?
- <math>
Risk = \frac {\mbox{number of persons experiencing event (food poisoning)}} {\mbox{number of persons exposed to risk factor (food)}} </math>
So the chicken eaters' risk = 22/74 = 0.297
And non-chicken eaters' risk = 2/35 = 0.057.
Those who ate the chicken had a risk over five times as high as those who did not, suggesting that eating chicken was the cause of the illness. Note, however, that this is not proof. Statistical methods would be used in a less clear cut case to decide what level of risk the risk factor would have to present to be able to say the risk factor "causes" the disease (for example in a study of the link between smoking and lung cancer).
The term "risk factor" was first coined by heart researcher Dr. Thomas R. Dawber in a landmark scientific paper in 1961, where he attributed heart disease to specific conditions (blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking).