Byssinosis: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 13:58, 24 March 2010

WikiDoc Resources for Byssinosis

Articles

Most recent articles on Byssinosis

Most cited articles on Byssinosis

Review articles on Byssinosis

Articles on Byssinosis in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Byssinosis

Images of Byssinosis

Photos of Byssinosis

Podcasts & MP3s on Byssinosis

Videos on Byssinosis

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Byssinosis

Bandolier on Byssinosis

TRIP on Byssinosis

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Byssinosis at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Byssinosis

Clinical Trials on Byssinosis at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Byssinosis

NICE Guidance on Byssinosis

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Byssinosis

CDC on Byssinosis

Books

Books on Byssinosis

News

Byssinosis in the news

Be alerted to news on Byssinosis

News trends on Byssinosis

Commentary

Blogs on Byssinosis

Definitions

Definitions of Byssinosis

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Byssinosis

Discussion groups on Byssinosis

Patient Handouts on Byssinosis

Directions to Hospitals Treating Byssinosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Byssinosis

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Byssinosis

Causes & Risk Factors for Byssinosis

Diagnostic studies for Byssinosis

Treatment of Byssinosis

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Byssinosis

International

Byssinosis en Espanol

Byssinosis en Francais

Business

Byssinosis in the Marketplace

Patents on Byssinosis

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Byssinosis

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Overview

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is not a single disease but is a complex syndrome of varying intensity, clinical presentation, and natural history.

The syndrome was first described in Iceland in 1874 and termed heykatarr. The syndrome is caused by sensitization to repeated inhalation of dusts containing one of 300 organic antigens. These organic dusts come from a wide variety of sources but most commonly include:

  • Dairy and grain products
  • Animal dander and protein
  • Wood bark
  • Water reservoir vaporizers

The two most common antigens are:

  1. Thermophilic actinomycetes and
  2. Avian proteins

As a rseult of exposure to thee antigens, the two most common causes (i.e. diseases) are:

  1. Farmer's lung and
  2. Bird fancier's lung

Pathologically, the HP syndrome is associated with diffuse inflammation of lung parenchyma and airways.


Based on the length and intensity of exposure and subsequent duration of illness, there are 3 clinical presentations of HP:

  1. Acute
  2. Subacute (intermittent)
  3. Chronic progressive


Synonyms and related keywords: hypersensitivity pneumonitis, HP, bird fancier's lung, extrinsic allergic alveolitis, farmer's lung, Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula, S rectivirgula, Micropolyspora faeni, M faeni, Thermoactinomyces sacchari, T sacchari, Thermoactinomyces vulgaris, T vulgaris, Penicillium casei, P casei, Aspergillus clavatus, A clavatus, Mucor stolonifer, M stolonifer, Sitophilus granarius, S granarius, Cladosporium, heykatarr, bagassosis, grain handler's lung, humidifier lung, air-conditioner lung, bird breeder's lung, cheese worker's lung, malt worker's lung, paprika splitter's lung, mollusk shell hypersensitivity, chemical worker's lung, pulmonary disease, lung disease.

Epidemiology and Demographics

  • The prevalence of HP varies significantly by region, climate, occupation/exposure and farming practices.
  • Farmers:
    • US: 8-540 cases per 100,000 persons per year among those at risk
    • UK: 420-3000 cases per 100,000 persons per year among those at risk
    • France: 4370 cases per 100,000 persons per year among those at risk
    • Finland: 1400-1700 cases per 100,000 persons per year among those at risk
  • Pigeon Breeders: 6000-21,000 cases per 100,000 persons per year
  • Bird Fanciers: 20-20,000 cases per 100,000 persons per year
  • Attack rates vary considerably, but can be high in sporadic outbreaks. For example a large proportion (52%) of office workers exposed to an infected humidifier were affected in one outbreak, and in another outbreak 27% of workers at a molding plant for polyurethane foam parts were affected.
  • The male to female ratio is approximately 1.2:1.
  • The mean age of the patients with HP is 61 ± 0.7 years (epidemiologic data from Spain).

Risk Factors

The following is a partial list of occupations and major causative antigens that put a patient at risk of HP:

  1. Farmers and cattle workers: These workers develop the most common form of HP which is caused by the antigen thermophilic actinomycetes. It is important to note that while Farmer's lung is the most common cause of HP, it still must be distinguished from febrile toxic reactions to inhaled mold dusts (organic dust toxic syndrome, a nonimmunologic reaction) which occurs 30-50 times more often than HP.
  2. Poultry and other bird handlers: These workers are exposed to droppings, feathers, and serum proteins of pigeons and other birds.
  3. Ventilation workers and those exposed to water-related contamination: These workers may be exposed to microorganisms thatcolonize humidifiers, forced-air systems, hot tubs, whirlpools, and spas. The putative antigens are derived from Thermoactinomyces or Cladosporium.
  4. Veterinarians and animal handlers: These workers obviously have daily contact with a large variety of animals and organic antigens.
  5. Grain and flour processors and loaders: These workers are exposed to grain. Grain can become colonized with a variety of microorganisms and their antigens.
  6. Lumber mill workers and paper and wallboard manufacturers: These workers are exposed to wood which can become colonized with molds and then becomes aerosolized.
  7. Plastic manufacturers, painters, and electronics industry workers: These workers can be exposed to diphenylmethane diisocyanate or toluene diisocyanate.
  8. Textile workers: These workers do develop lung injury but this is not a true form of HP. The injury is characterized by diffuse alveolar damage or airway dysfunction and includes diseases such as byssinosis and nylon worker's lung.

Pathophysiology & Etiology

Pathologic Findings

Acute HP

There are noncaseating interstitial granulomas and mononuclear cell infiltration in a peribronchial distribution. Giant cells are prominent.

Subacute or intermittent HP

The noncaseating granulomas are more well formed. There is bronchiolitis with or without organizing pneumonia. Interstitial fibrosis is present.

Chronic HP

There is chronic interstitial inflammation and alveolar destruction (honeycombing). There is dense fibrosis. The pathologic findings of chronic HP that are often associated with a poorer prognosis include the following 3 patterns of fibrosis:

  • Predominantly peripheral fibrosis: in a patchy pattern with architectural distortion and fibroblast foci similar to usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)
  • Homogeneous linear fibrosis: similar to fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)
  • Irregular predominantly peribronchiolar fibrosis

Pathophysiology of Immune Response

Exposure results in the development of circulating immunoglobulin G antibodies that are specific for the offending antigen. This antibody that forms is called the precipitating antibody, and it reacts with the specific putative antigen to form a precipitant. Initially the disease process was thought to be immunecomplex-mediated. However, subsequent studies have demonstrated that cell-mediated immunity is more important.

In the acute phase, there is a local increase in neutrophils in the alveoli and small airways. This is followed by an influx of mononuclear cells which release proteolytic enzymes, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes.

Natural History

  • In general, the majority of patients recover completely after the inciting exposure ceases.
  • The prognosis of Bird Fancier's Disease is worse than Farmer's Lung.
  • Other varieties of HP have more variable outcomes.

Diagnosis

The 6 Diagnostic Criteria for Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP)

When combined with the appropriate epidemiologic data and in areas of high prevalence, these criteria can establish the diagnosis of HP without the need for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or biopsy (Lacasse, 2003).

  1. Exposure to a known offending antigen
  2. Positive precipitating antibodies to the offending antigen
  3. Recurrent episodes of symptoms
  4. Inspiratory crackles on physical examination
  5. Symptoms occurring 4-8 hours after exposure
  6. Weight loss

Conditions That Can Mimic HP

Other diseases that are secondary to inhalation of organic agents but are not true forms of HP are as follows:

  1. Inhalation fever: Patients present with fever, chills, headache, and myalgias however there are not pulmonary findings (although mild dyspnea may occur). Onset is 4-8 hours following exposure. There are no long-term sequelae occur.
  2. Organic dust toxic syndrome: This syndrome is the result of exposure to bioaerosols contaminated with toxin-producing fungi (mycotoxins). Patients present with fever, chills, and myalgias 4-6 hours after exposure. In contrast to inhalation fever, the chest X ray may show diffuse opacities. Bronchiolitis or diffuse alveolar damage may be present on lung biopsy specimens. This is not a true form of HP because no prior sensitization is required.
  3. Chronic bronchitis: This can result from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which is the most common respiratory syndrome among agricultural workers. The prevalence of chronic bronchitis is much higher at 10%, compared with 1.4% for HP.
  4. Exposure to aerosolized Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC): A hypersensitivity pneumonitis like syndrome has been described in patients exposed to aerosolized Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Hot tub lung is a term used to describe these hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like cases because they have generally been associated with hot tub use. The syndrome has been linked to the high levels of infectious aerosols containing MAC organisms found in the water. Whether this syndrome represents a true MAC infection or classic HP remains controversial (Marras, 2005).

Differential Diagnosis

By frequency of Interstitial Lung Diseases (Xaubet, 2004):

  1. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (38.6%)
  2. Sarcoidosis (14.9%)
  3. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (10.4%)
  4. Interstitial lung disease associated with collagen vascular diseases (9.9%)
  5. Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP) (6.6%)
  6. Unclassified (5.1%)


In alphabetical order:

Air-conditioner lung

Aspergillus clavatus

Bagassosis

Bird breeder's lung

Bird fancier's lung

Cheese worker's lung

Chemical worker's lung

Cladosporium

Farmer's lung

Grain handler's lung

Humidifier lung

Malt worker's lung

Micropolyspora faeni

Mollusk shell hypersensitivity

Mucor stolonifer

Paprika splitter's lung

Penicillium casei

Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula

Sitophilus granarius

Thermoactinomyces sacchari

Thermoactinomyces vulgaris

History and Symptoms

History: The clinical presentation of HP is categorized as acute, subacute, or chronic, according to duration of illness.

Acute HP

  • Symptoms develop 4-6 hours following exposure to the inciting agent and then generally resolve spontaneously within 12 hours to several days upon removal of the inciting agent.
  • Symptoms include the abrupt development of

Subacute or Iintermittent HP

  • The same symptoms may be present in patients who experience acute attacks on multiple occasions.

Patients with subacute HP present similarly to patients with acute disease, but symptoms are less severe and last longer.

Chronic HP

Patients often lack a history of acute episodes.

They have an insidious onset of cough, progressive dyspnea, fatigue, and weight loss.

Removing exposure results in only partial improvement.

Physical Examination

In general, the signs of acute, subacute and chronic forms of the disease are similar except patients with the chronic form may have clubbing, weight loss and muscle wasting.

Appearance of the Patient

Weight loss is present in the chronic form of the syndrome.

Vital Signs

Fever and tachypnea are often present.

Lungs

Diffuse fine bibasilar crackles

Extremities

Clubbing is observed in 50% of patients with the chronic form of the syndrome. Muscle wasting is also observed in the chronic form of the syndrome.

Laboratory Findings

Chest X Ray

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

A test to assess for precipitating antibodies to the offending antigen will be positive.

Risk Stratification and Prognosis

  • In general, the majority of patients recover completely after the inciting exposure ceases.
  • Other varieties of HP have more variable outcomes.

Treatment

Pharmacotherapy

Acute Pharmacotherapies

References

Chronic Pharmacotherapies

References

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

"The Way I Like To Do It ..." Tips and Tricks From Clinicians Around The World

<biblio>

</biblio>

Acknowledgements

The content on this page was first contributed by: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D.

List of contributors:

Suggested Reading and Key General References

Suggested Links and Web Resources

For Patients

Template:Respiratory pathology Template:SIB


Template:WikiDoc Sources