CHADS2 score: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
If patients have a [http://www.ganfyd.org/index.php?title=CHA2DS2-VASc_score CHA2DS2-VASc score] score=0, such patients are ‘truly low risk’<ref>Van Staa TP, Setakis E, Di Tanna GL, Lane DA, Lip GY. A comparison of risk stratification schema for stroke in 79884 atrial fibrillation patients in general practice. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct 1. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04085.x. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21029359.</ref>, and thus, the ESC guideline recommendation is to prescribe either aspirin or no antithrombotic therapy, but 'no antithrombotic therapy' is preferred<ref>Lip GY, Halperin JL. Improving stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2010 Jun;123(6):484-8. </ref>. | If patients have a [http://www.ganfyd.org/index.php?title=CHA2DS2-VASc_score CHA2DS2-VASc score] score=0, such patients are ‘truly low risk’<ref>Van Staa TP, Setakis E, Di Tanna GL, Lane DA, Lip GY. A comparison of risk stratification schema for stroke in 79884 atrial fibrillation patients in general practice. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct 1. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04085.x. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21029359.</ref>, and thus, the ESC guideline recommendation is to prescribe either aspirin or no antithrombotic therapy, but 'no antithrombotic therapy' is preferred<ref>Lip GY, Halperin JL. Improving stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2010 Jun;123(6):484-8. </ref>. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
[[Category:Stroke]] | [[Category:Stroke]] | ||
[[Category:Cardiology]] | |||
[[Category:Cardiology] | |||
[[Category:Medical informatics]] | [[Category:Medical informatics]] | ||
[[Category:Medical tests]] | [[Category:Medical tests]] | ||
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | {{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | ||
{{WikiDoc Sources}} | {{WikiDoc Sources}} |
Revision as of 22:16, 18 November 2010
WikiDoc Resources for CHADS2 score |
Articles |
---|
Most recent articles on CHADS2 score Most cited articles on CHADS2 score |
Media |
Powerpoint slides on CHADS2 score |
Evidence Based Medicine |
Clinical Trials |
Ongoing Trials on CHADS2 score at Clinical Trials.gov Clinical Trials on CHADS2 score at Google
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt |
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on CHADS2 score
|
Books |
News |
Commentary |
Definitions |
Patient Resources / Community |
Patient resources on CHADS2 score Discussion groups on CHADS2 score Patient Handouts on CHADS2 score Directions to Hospitals Treating CHADS2 score Risk calculators and risk factors for CHADS2 score
|
Healthcare Provider Resources |
Causes & Risk Factors for CHADS2 score |
Continuing Medical Education (CME) |
International |
|
Business |
Experimental / Informatics |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Please Join in Editing This Page and Apply to be an Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
Condition | Points | |
---|---|---|
C | Congestive heart failure | |
H | Hypertension: blood pressure consistently above 140/90 mmHg (or treated hypertension on medication) | |
A | Age >/=75 years | |
D | Diabetes Mellitus | |
S2 | Prior Stroke or TIA |
CHADS score or CHADS2 score is a clinical prediction rule for estimating the risk of stroke in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF), a common and serious heart arrhythmia associated with thromboembolic stroke. It is used to determine whether or not treatment is required with anticoagulation therapy or antiplatelet therapy,[1] since AF can cause stasis of blood in the upper heart chambers, leading to the formation of a mural thrombus that can dislodge into the blood flow, reach the brain, cut off blood supply to the brain, and cause a stroke. A high CHADS2 score corresponds to a greater risk of stroke, while a low CHADS2 score corresponds to a lower risk of stroke. The CHADS2 score was validated by a study of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation patients aged 65 to 95 who were not prescribed the anticoagulant warfarin.[2]
Method
The CHADS2 scoring table is shown above:[3]
Adding together the points that correspond to the conditions that a patient has will result in the CHADS2
score. This score is used in the next section to estimate stroke risk.
Risk of stroke
CHADS2 Score | Stroke Risk % | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
According to the findings of the validation study, the risk of stroke as a percentage per year is:
However, warfarin has its own stroke risk[4] and other drawbacks, which were considered in developing the recommendations of the next section.
The CHADS2 score has various limitations, which have been debated [5]. Notably, many stroke risk factors have not been included, and whilst simple, the score has only modest predictive value for thromboembolism.
To complement the CHADS2 score, by the inclusion of additional 'stroke risk modifier' risk factors, the CHA2DS2-VASc score has been proposed [6]. These additional 'clinically relevant non-major' stroke risk factors include age 65-74, female gender and vascular disease. In the CHA2DS2-VASc score score, 'age 75 and above' also has extra weight, with 2 points.
The CHA2DS2-VASc score has been used in the new European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation [7].
The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend that if the patient has a CHADS2 score of 2 and above, oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC, eg. with warfarin(INR2-3) or one of the new OAC drugs, such as dabigatran)should be prescribed.
If the CHADS2 score is 0-1, other stroke risk modifiers should be considered: (i) If we have 2 or more risk factors (essentially a CHA2DS2-VASc score score of 2 or more), OAC is recommended; and (ii) If we have 1 risk factor (essentially a CHA2DS2-VASc score score=1), antithrombotic therapy with OAC or aspirin (OAC preferred) is recommended, and patient values and preferences should be considered.
If patients have a CHA2DS2-VASc score score=0, such patients are ‘truly low risk’[8], and thus, the ESC guideline recommendation is to prescribe either aspirin or no antithrombotic therapy, but 'no antithrombotic therapy' is preferred[9].
References
- ↑ Gage BF, van Walraven C, Pearce L; et al. (2004). "Selecting patients with atrial fibrillation for anticoagulation: stroke risk stratification in patients taking aspirin". Circulation. 110 (16): 2287&ndash, 92. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000145172.55640.93. PMID 15477396.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ (2001). "Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation". JAMA. 285 (22): 2864–70. PMID 11401607.
- ↑ "Risk of Stroke with AF". VA Palo Alto Medical Center and at Stanford University: the Sportsmedicine Program and the Cardiomyopathy Clinic. Retrieved 2007-09-14.
- ↑ Steiner, Thorsten (2006). "Intracerebral hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulant therapy: current practices and unresolved questions". Stroke. 37 (1): 256–62. PMID 16339459 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000196989.09900.f8. Unknown parameter
|coauthors=
ignored (help) - ↑ Karthikeyan G, Eikelboom JW. The CHADS2 score for stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation--friend or foe? Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jul 5;104(1):45-8.
- ↑ Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010 Feb;137(2):263-72.
- ↑ European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, Van Gelder IC, Al-Attar N, Hindricks G, Prendergast B, Heidbuchel H, Alfieri O, Angelini A, Atar D, Colonna P, De Caterina R, De Sutter J, Goette A, Gorenek B, Heldal M, Hohloser SH, Kolh P, Le Heuzey JY, Ponikowski P, Rutten FH. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(19):2369-429.
- ↑ Van Staa TP, Setakis E, Di Tanna GL, Lane DA, Lip GY. A comparison of risk stratification schema for stroke in 79884 atrial fibrillation patients in general practice. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct 1. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04085.x. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21029359.
- ↑ Lip GY, Halperin JL. Improving stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2010 Jun;123(6):484-8.