Chronic stable angina treatment anti-lipid agents

Chronic stable angina Microchapters
Acute Coronary Syndrome Main Page
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Classification
Classic Chronic Stable Angina
Atypical Walk through Angina Mixed Angina Nocturnal Angina Postprandial Angina Cardiac Syndrome X Vasospastic Angina
Differentiating Chronic Stable Angina from Acute Coronary Syndromes
Pathophysiology
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Stratification
Pretest Probability of CAD in a Patient with Angina
Prognosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Test Selection Guideline for the Individual Basis
Laboratory Findings
Electrocardiogram
Exercise ECG
Chest X Ray
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with Pharmacologic Stress
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with Thallium
Echocardiography
Exercise Echocardiography
Computed coronary tomography angiography(CCTA)
Positron Emission Tomography
Ambulatory ST Segment Monitoring
Electron Beam Tomography
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Coronary Angiography
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Revascularization
PCI
CABG
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization
Alternative Therapies for Refractory Angina
Transmyocardial Revascularization (TMR)
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
Enhanced External Counter Pulsation (EECP)
ACC/AHA Guidelines for Alternative Therapies in patients with Refractory Angina
Discharge Care
Patient Follow-Up
Rehabilitation
Secondary Prevention
Guidelines for Asymptomatic Patients
Noninvasive Testing in Asymptomatic Patients
Risk Stratification by Coronary Angiography
Pharmacotherapy to Prevent MI and Death in Asymptomatic Patients
Landmark Trials
Case Studies
Case #1
Chronic stable angina treatment anti-lipid agents On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Chronic stable angina treatment anti-lipid agents
CDC onChronic stable angina treatment anti-lipid agents
Chronic stable angina treatment anti-lipid agents in the news
Blogs on Chronic stable angina treatment anti-lipid agents
to Hospitals Treating Chronic stable angina treatment anti-lipid agents
Risk calculators and risk factors for Chronic stable angina treatment anti-lipid agents

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2] Phone:617-632-7753; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; John Fani Srour, M.D.; Jinhui Wu, M.D.

Anti-lipid agents

If baseline LDL-Cholesterol is ≥100 mg/dL, LDL lowering drug therapy should be initiated in addition to therapeutic lifestyle changes. When LDL lowering medications are used in high risk or moderately high risk persons, it is recommended that intensity of therapy be sufficient to achieve a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-Cholesterol levels.

If baseline LDL-C is 70 to 100 mg/dL, it is reasonable to treat LDL-C to <70 mg/dL. If on-treatment LDL-C is ≥100 mg/dL, LDL lowering drug therapy should be intensified.

If Triglycerides are 200-499 mg/dL, the sum of non–HDL-Cholesterol levels should be <130 mg/dL. Moreover this, further reduction of non–HDL Cholesterol to <100 mg/dL is reasonable, if Triglycerides are ≥200 to 499 mg/dL.

Therapeutic options to reduce non–HDL-C are: ’’’Niacin”’ can be useful as a therapeutic option to reduce non–HDL-C (after LDL-C lowering therapy) or ’’’Fibrate”’ therapy as a therapeutic option can be useful to reduce non–HDL-C (after starting to LDL-C–lowering therapy).

If Triglycerides are ≥500 mg/dL, therapeutic options to lower the Triglycerides to reduce the risk of pancreatitis are fibrate or niacin; these should be initiated before LDL-Choesterol lowering therapy. The goal is to achieve non–HDL-C <130 mg/dL if possible.

If LDL-Cholesterol <70 mg/dL is the chosen target, consider drug titration to achieve this level to minimize side effects and cost of therapy. When LDL-Cholesterol level of <70 mg/dL is not achievable because of high baseline LDL-Cholesterol levels, it is generally possible to achieve reductions of >50% in LDL-Cholesterol levels by either statins or any other LDL-Cholesterol –lowering drug combinations. Treatment with anti lipid drug combinations is beneficial for patients on lipid lowering therapy who are unable to achieve LDL-Cholesterol <100 mg/dL.

ACC/AHA Guidelines- Pharmacotherapy to Prevent MI and Death and Reduce Symptoms (DO NOT EDIT)

“

Class I 1. LDL-C should be less than 100 mg per dL. (Level of Evidence: A) 2. If baseline LDL-C is greater than or equal to 100 mg per dL, LDL-lowering drug therapy should be initiated in addition to therapeutic lifestyle changes. When LDL-lowering medications are used in high-risk or moderately high-risk persons, it is recommended that intensity of therapy be sufficient to achieve a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-C levels. (Level of Evidence: A) 3. Drug combinations are beneficial for patients on lipid lowering therapy who are unable to achieve LDL-C less than 100 mg per dL. (Level of Evidence: C) 4. If TG are 200 to 499 mg per dL, non–HDL-C should be less than 130 mg per dL. (Level of Evidence: B) 5. If TG are greater than or equal to 500 mg per dL, therapeutic options to lower the TG to reduce the risk of pancreatitis are fibrate or niacin; these should be initiated before LDL-C lowering therapy. The goal is to achieve non–HDL-C less than 130 mg per dL if possible. (Level of Evidence: C) Class IIa 1. Lipid-lowering therapy in patients with documented or suspected CAD and LDL cholesterol 100 to 129 mg/dL, with a target LDL of 100 mg/dL. (Level of Evidence: B) 2. If baseline LDL-C is 70 to 100 mg per dL, it is reasonable to treat LDL-C to less than 70 mg per dL. (Level of evidence: B) 3. Reduction of LDL-C to less than 70 mg per dL or high-dose statin therapy is reasonable. (Level of evidence: A) 4. Further reduction of non–HDL-C to less than 100 mg per dL is reasonable, if TG are greater than or equal to 200 to 499 mg per dL. (Level of Evidence: B) 5. Therapeutic options to reduce non–HDL-C are: a. Niacin can be useful as a therapeutic option to reduce non–HDL-C (after LDL-C–lowering therapy) or b. Fibrate therapy as a therapeutic option can be useful to reduce non–HDL-C (after LDL-C–lowering therapy). (Level of Evidence: B) 6. If LDL-C less than 70 mg per dL is the chosen target, consider drug titration to achieve this level to minimize side effects and cost. When LDL-C less than 70 mg per dL is not achievable because of high baseline LDL-C levels, it generally is possible to achieve reductions of greater than 50% in LDL-C levels by either statins or LDL-C–lowering drug combinations. (Level of Evidence: C)

”

ESC Guidelines- Pharmacological therapy to improve prognosis in patients with stable angina (DO NOT EDIT)

“

Class I 1. Statin therapy for all patients with coronary disease. (Level of Evidence: A) Class IIa 1. High dose statin therapy in high-risk (more than 2% annual CV mortality) patients with proven coronary disease. (Level of Evidence: B) Class IIb 1. Fibrate therapy in patients with low HDL and high triglycerides who have diabetes or the metabolic syndrome. (Level of evidence: B) 2. Fibrate or nicotinic acid as adjunctive therapy to statin in patients with low HDL and high triglycerides at high risk (more than 2% annual CV mortality). (Level of evidence: C)

”

Vote on and Suggest Revisions to the Current Guidelines

• The Chronic Stable Angina Living Guidelines: Vote on current recommendations and suggest revisions to the guidelines

Sources

• The ACC/AHA/ACP–ASIM Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina

• TheACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina

• The 2007 Chronic Angina Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina

• Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology

References

{{WikiDoc Sources}