Atrial septal defect CT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining shunt volume and pressure differences. | Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining shunt volume and pressure differences. | ||
==Advantages== | ==Advantages== |
Revision as of 18:13, 13 September 2011
Atrial Septal Defect Microchapters | |
Treatment | |
---|---|
Surgery | |
| |
Special Scenarios | |
Case Studies | |
Atrial septal defect CT On the Web | |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Atrial septal defect CT | |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Atrial septal defect CT | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [2]; Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [4]
Overview
Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining shunt volume and pressure differences.
Advantages
- Provides additional anatomic imaging detail to supplement echocardiographic findings.
- Well suited for the visualization and demonwstration of the aberrant pulmonary venous return noted in the sinus venosus defect. [1]
- It is done faster compared to MRI.
- Avoids the need for anesthesia in small children.
- Can identify associated heart anomalies.[1]
Disadvantages
- Costly
- Radiation can have long terms side-effect on growing children.
- Not a modality for detecting or quantify a defect[1]
- Not a modality for quantifying shunt volume and pressure differences[1]