Atrial septal defect CT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Advantages== | ==Advantages== | ||
* Provides additional anatomic | * Provides additional anatomic details compared to [[echocardiography]]. | ||
* | * Helps in visualization of the aberrant pulmonary venous return (seen in sinus venosus defect). <ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | ||
* | * Done faster compared to MRI. | ||
* Avoids the need for anesthesia in | * Avoids the need for general anesthesia in children. | ||
* Can identify associated heart anomalies.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | * Can identify associated heart anomalies.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | ||
Revision as of 18:23, 13 September 2011
|
Atrial Septal Defect Microchapters | |
|
Treatment | |
|---|---|
|
Surgery | |
|
| |
|
Special Scenarios | |
|
Case Studies | |
|
Atrial septal defect CT On the Web | |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Atrial septal defect CT | |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Atrial septal defect CT | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [2]; Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [4]
Overview
Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining shunt volume and pressure differences.
Advantages
- Provides additional anatomic details compared to echocardiography.
- Helps in visualization of the aberrant pulmonary venous return (seen in sinus venosus defect). [1]
- Done faster compared to MRI.
- Avoids the need for general anesthesia in children.
- Can identify associated heart anomalies.[1]
Disadvantages
- Costly
- Radiation can have long terms side-effect on growing children.
- Not a modality for detecting or quantify a defect[1]
- Not a modality for quantifying shunt volume and pressure differences[1]