White coat hypertension: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


==Overview==
==Overview==
'''[[White coat]] [[hypertension]]''' is a phenomenon in which patients exhibit elevated [[blood pressure]] in a clinical setting but not when recorded by themselves at home. It is believed that this is due to the [[anxiety]] some people experience during a clinic visit.
'''[[White coat]] [[hypertension]]''', more commonly known as '''white coat syndrome''', is a phenomenon in which patients exhibit elevated [[blood pressure]] in a clinical setting but not in other settings.<ref name="urlHypertension: Overview - eMedicine">{{cite web |url=http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/889877-overview |title=Hypertension: Overview - eMedicine }}</ref> It is believed that this is due to the [[anxiety]] some people experience during a clinic visit.<ref name="healthminutes01">{{cite video |people=Swan, Norman |date=20 June 2010 |title=Health Minutes - Hypertension |url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQC9PYgZ_Zw |accessdate=27 August 2010}}</ref>


As the notion of "normal" is subjective and changes from individual to individual a reference measurement was necessary. As night-time and self measured values are often not subject to daily [[Stress (medicine)|stress]] and clinical values are subject to unusual [[anxiety]], daytime ambulatory blood pressure is used as a reference as it takes into account daily stress but not in excess.  Due to specificity involved in diagnosis of white coat hypertension, many problems have been incurred in its [[diagnosis]] and treatment.
As the notion of "normal" is subjective and changes from individual to individual a reference measurement was necessary. As night-time and self measured values are often not subject to daily [[Stress (medicine)|stress]] and clinical values are subject to unusual [[anxiety]], daytime ambulatory blood pressure is used as a reference as it takes into account daily stress but not in excess.  Due to specificity involved in diagnosis of white coat hypertension, many problems have been incurred in its [[medical diagnosis|diagnosis]] and treatment.
 
The term "masked hypertension" can be used to describe the contrasting phenomenon, where blood pressure is elevated during daily living, but not in an office setting.<ref name="pmid17664850">{{cite journal |author=Pickering TG, Eguchi K, Kario K |title=Masked hypertension: a review |journal=Hypertens. Res. |volume=30 |issue=6 |pages=479–88 |year=2007 |month=June |pmid=17664850 |doi= 10.1291/hypres.30.479|url=http://joi.jlc.jst.go.jp/JST.JSTAGE/hypres/30.479?from=PubMed |format= &ndash; <sup>[http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=intitle%3AMasked+hypertension%3A+a+review&as_publication=Hypertens.+Res.&as_ylo=2007&as_yhi=2007&btnG=Search Scholar search]</sup>}} {{dead link|date=April 2009}}</ref>


==Diagnosis==
==Diagnosis==
The diagnosis of white coat hypertension is made difficult as a result of the unreliable measures taken from the conventional methods of detection. These methods often involve an interface with health care professionals and frequently results are tarnished by a list of factors including variability in the individual’s blood pressure, technical inaccuracies, anxiety of the patient, recent ingestion of [[pressor]] substances and talking, amongst many other factors. The most common measure of blood pressure is taken from a non invasive instrument called a [[sphygmomanometer]]. ''"A survey showed that 96% of primary care physicians habitually use a cuff size too small,"'' (Thomas G Pickering, 1994) adding to the difficulty in making an informed diagnosis. For such reasons, white coat hypertension can not be diagnosed with a standard clinical visit.   
In studies, white coat hypertension can be defined as the presence of a defined hypertensive average blood pressure in an office setting but not at home.<ref name="pmid18320786">{{cite journal |author=Ruxer J, Mozdzan M, Baranski M, Wozniak-Sosnowska U, Markuszewski L |title="White coat hypertension" in type 2 diabetic patients |journal=Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. |volume=117 |issue=10 |pages=452–6 |year=2007 |month=October |pmid=18320786 |doi= |url=http://tip.org.pl/pamw/issue/search.html?lang=en&search=18320786}}</ref>
 
Diagnosis is made difficult as a result of the unreliable measures taken from the conventional methods of detection. These methods often involve an interface with health care professionals and frequently results are tarnished by a list of factors including variability in the individual’s blood pressure, technical inaccuracies, anxiety of the patient,<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.bpmonitoring.com/pt/re/bpm/abstract.00126097-200512000-00006.htm;jsessionid=LpvGzJN7PDC1yqJtnQj3ZWfmzgdnhWycyzsKybSHsr2FLx3hR1vh!1805002056!181195629!8091!-1 |author=Jhalani, Juhee a; Goyal, Tanya a; Clemow, Lynn a; Schwartz, Joseph E. b; Pickering, Thomas G. a; Gerin, William a|title=Anxiety and outcome expectations predict the white-coat effect.  |volume=10 | issue = 6 |month= December | year=2005 |publisher= Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. |pages=pp317–319}}</ref> recent ingestion of [[pressor]] substances, and talking, amongst many other factors. The most common measure of blood pressure is taken from a noninvasive instrument called a [[sphygmomanometer]]. "A survey showed that 96% of primary care physicians habitually use a cuff size too small,"<ref name="Pickering1994">{{cite journal | author=Pickering T | title=Blood pressure measurement and detection of hypertension | journal=Lancet | volume=344 | issue=8914 | pages=31–5 | year=1994 | pmid=7912303 | doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91053-7}}</ref> adding to the difficulty in making an informed diagnosis. For such reasons, white coat hypertension cannot be diagnosed with a standard clinical visit.  It can be reduced (but not eliminated) with automated blood pressure measurements over 15 to 20 minutes in a quiet part of the office or clinic.<ref name='Pickering2005p146'>{{cite journal|title=Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research |journal=Hypertension |year=2005|first1=TG |last1=Pickering |first2=JE |last2=Hall |first3=LJ |last3=Appel |first4=BE |last4=Falkner |first5=J |last5=Graves |first6=MN |last6=Hill |first7=DW |last7=Jones |first8=T |last8=Kurtz |author9=Sheps, SG; Roccella, EJ |display-authors=3|volume=45|issue=5|pages=142–61|pmid=15611362 |doi=10.1161/01.HYP.0000150859.47929.8e |url=http://hyper.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/45/1/142|format=|accessdate=2009-10-01| ref=harv}} See p. 146, ''Masked Hypertension or Isolated Ambulatory Hypertension''.</ref>
 
Patients with white coat hypertension do not exhibit the signs indicative of trepidation and their increased blood pressure is often not accompanied by [[tachycardia]].<ref name="Pickering1988">{{cite journal | author=Pickering T, James G, Boddie C, Harshfield G, Blank S, Laragh J | title=How common is white coat hypertension? | journal=JAMA | volume=259 | issue=2 | pages=225–8 | year=1988 | pmid=3336140 | doi=10.1001/jama.259.2.225}}</ref> This is supported by studies that repeatedly indicate that 15%&ndash;30% of those thought to have mild hypertension as a result of clinic or office recordings display normal blood pressure and no unusual response to pressure stimulus. These persons did not show any specific characteristics such as age that may be indicative of a higher susceptibility to white coat hypertension.<ref>{{cite journal | author=McGrath B | title=Is white-coat hypertension innocent? | journal=Lancet | volume=348 | issue=9028 | pages=630 | year=1996 | pmid=8782749 | doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65069-6}} - commenatry on:<br>{{cite journal | author=Glen S, Elliott H, Curzio J, Lees K, Reid J | title=White-coat hypertension as a cause of cardiovascular dysfunction | journal=Lancet | volume=348 | issue=9028 | pages=654–7 | year=1996 | pmid=8782756 | doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02303-3}}</ref>
 
[[Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring]] and patient self-measurement using a [[home blood pressure monitoring]] device is being increasingly used to differentiate those with white coat hypertension or experiencing the white coat effect from those with chronic hypertension. This does not mean that these methods are without fault. Daytime ambulatory values, despite taking into account stresses of everyday life when taken during the patient's daily routine, are still susceptible to the effects of daily variables such as physical activity, stress and duration of sleep. Ambulatory monitoring has been found to be the more practical and reliable method in detecting patients with white coat hypertension and for the prediction of target organ damage. Even as such, the diagnosis and treatment of white coat hypertension remains controversial.


Patients of white coat hypertension do not exhibit the signs indicative of trepidation and their increased blood pressure is often not accompanied with [[tachycardia]] (TG Pickering 1988). This is supported by studies that repeatedly indicate that 15–30% of those thought to have mild hypertension as a result of clinic or office recordings, display normal blood pressure and no unusual response to pressure stimulus. These persons did not show any specific characteristics such as age that may be indicative of a higher susceptibility to white coat hypertension (BP McGrath, 1996).
Recent studies showed that [[home blood pressure monitoring]] is as accurate as a 24-hour ambulatory monitoring in determining blood pressure levels.<ref name="pmid16647616">{{cite journal |author=Niiranen TJ, Kantola IM, Vesalainen R, Johansson J, Ruuska MJ |title=A comparison of home measurement and ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure in the adjustment of antihypertensive treatment |journal=Am. J. Hypertens. |volume=19 |issue=5 |pages=468–74 |year=2006 |month=May |pmid=16647616 |doi=10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.017}}</ref> Researchers at the [[University of Turku]], [[Finland]] studied 98 patients with untreated hypertension. They compared patients using a home blood pressure device and those wearing a 24-hour ambulatory monitor. Researcher Dr. Niiranen said that "home blood pressure measurement can be used effectively for guiding [[anti-hypertensive]] treatment". Dr. Stergiou added that home tracking of blood pressure "is more convenient and also less costly than ambulatory monitoring."


Ambulatory monitoring and patient self-measurement using a [[home blood pressure monitoring]] device is being increasingly used to differentiate those with white-coat hypertension or experiencing the white coat effect from those with chronic hypertension. This does not mean that these methods are without fault. Day time ambulatory values, despite taking into account stresses of everyday life when taken during the patient’s daily routine, is still susceptible to the effects of daily variables such as physical activity, stress and duration of sleep. Ambulatory monitoring has been found to be the more practical and reliable method in detecting patients with white coat hypertension and for the prediction of target organ damage. Even as such, the diagnosis and treatment of white coat hypertension remains controversial.
Use of breathing patterns has been proposed as a technique for identifying white coat hypertension.<ref name="pmid19009177">{{cite journal |author=Thalenberg JM, Póvoa RM, Bombig MT, de Sá GA, Atallah AN, Luna Filho B |title=Slow breathing test increases the suspicion of white-coat hypertension in the office |journal=Arq. Bras. Cardiol. |volume=91 |issue=4 |pages=243–9, 267–73 |year=2008 |month=October |pmid=19009177 |doi= |url=http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2008001600010&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en}}</ref>


Recent studies (American Journal of Hypertension, May 2006) showed [[home blood pressure monitoring]] is as accurate as a 24 hour ambulatory monitoring in determining blood pressure levels. Researchers at the University of Turku, Finland studied 98 patients with untreated hypertension. They compared patients using a home blood pressure device and those wearing a 24hr ambulatory monitor. Researcher Dr. Niiranen said that, "home blood pressure measurement can be used effectively for guiding [[anti-hypertensive]] treatment". Dr. Stergiou added that home tracking of blood pressure, "is more convenient and also less costly than ambulatory monitoring".
In one Turkish study of 438 consecutive patients, 38% were normotensive, 43% had white coat hypertension, 2% had masked hypertension, and 15% had sustained hypertension. Even patients taking medication for sustained hypertension who are normotensive at home may exhibit white coat hypertension in the office setting.<ref name="pmid16778338">{{cite journal |author=Helvaci MR, Seyhanli M |title=What a high prevalence of white coat hypertension in society! |journal=Intern. Med. |volume=45 |issue=10 |pages=671–4 |year=2006 |pmid=16778338 |doi= 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1650|url=http://joi.jlc.jst.go.jp/JST.JSTAGE/internalmedicine/45.1650?from=PubMed |format= &ndash; <sup>[http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=intitle%3AWhat+a+high+prevalence+of+white+coat+hypertension+in+society%21&as_publication=Intern.+Med.&as_ylo=2006&as_yhi=2006&btnG=Search Scholar search]</sup>}} {{dead link|date=April 2009}}</ref>


==Implications for treatment==
==Implications for treatment==
It should be remembered that all the established published trials on the consequences of high blood pressure and the benefits of treating, are based on one-time measurement in clinical settings rather than the generally slightly lower readings obtained from ambulatory recordings.
In general, individuals with white coat hypertension have lower morbidity than patients with sustained hypertension, but higher morbidity than the clinically normotensive.<ref name="pmid17435652">{{cite journal |author=Khan TV, Khan SS, Akhondi A, Khan TW |title=White coat hypertension: relevance to clinical and emergency medical services personnel |journal=MedGenMed |volume=9 |issue=1 |pages=52 |year=2007 |pmid=17435652 |pmc=1924974 |doi= |url=http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/552593}}</ref>


The debate and conflicting ideas revolve around whether or not it would be feasible to treat white coat hypertension as there still is no conclusive evidence that a temporary rising in blood pressure during clinic visits has an adverse effect on health. It has been proposed that in order to facilitate treatment decisions.
However, it should be remembered that all the established published trials on the consequences of high blood pressure and the benefits of treating are based on one-time measurement in clinical settings rather than the generally slightly lower readings obtained from ambulatory recordings.


In fact many cross sectional studies have shown that ''"target-organ damage (as exemplified by [[left ventricular hypertrophy]]) is less in white-coat hypertensive [patients] than in sustained hypertensive [patients] even after the allowance has been made for differences in clinic pressure"''(TG Pickering, 1994). Many believe that patients with "white coat" hypertension do not require even very small doses of antihypertensive therapy as it may result in [[hypotension]] but must still be careful as patients may show signs of vascular changes and may eventually develop hypertension.
The debate and conflicting ideas revolve around whether or not it would be feasible to treat white coat hypertension, as there still is no conclusive evidence that a temporary rise in blood pressure during office visits has an adverse effect on health.


If a typically normotensive patient has high blood pressure during an anxiety provoking experience, such as being reviewed by a health care professional, they are said to be experiencing the '''white coat effect'''.
In fact, many cross sectional studies have shown that "[[target-organ damage]] (as exemplified by [[left ventricular hypertrophy]]) is less in white-coat hypertensive [patients] than in sustained hypertensive [patients] even after the allowance has been made for differences in clinic pressure".<ref name="Pickering1994"/> Many believe that patients with "white coat" hypertension do not require even very small doses of antihypertensive therapy as it may result in [[hypotension]], but must still be careful as patients may show signs of vascular changes and may eventually develop hypertension.


==See also==
==See also==
{{wiktionary}}
* [[Blood pressure]]
* [[Blood pressure]]
* [[Hypertension]]
* [[Hypertension]]
* [[Home blood pressure monitoring]]
* [[Home blood pressure monitoring]]


== References ==
==References==
* Donald E. Hricik, Jackson T. Wright, Michael C. Smith. Hypertension secrets. c2002; 9-10, 83,88
{{Reflist|2}}
* Norman M. Kaplan, Ellin Lieberman. Clinical hypertension. Seventh edition. 1998; 23-26, 31-32, 35, 142
[http://www.facmedicine.com/?p=104 Faculty Of Medicine : White Coat Syndrome]
* {{cite journal | author=Pickering T | title=Blood pressure measurement and detection of hypertension. | journal=Lancet | volume=344 | issue=8914 | pages=31-5 | year=1994 | id=PMID 7912303}}
{{Vascular_diseases}}
* {{cite journal | author=Ramsay L, Williams B, Johnston G, MacGregor G, Poston L, Potter J, Poulter N, Russell G | title=British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary. | journal=BMJ | volume=319 | issue=7210 | pages=630-5 | year=1999 | id=PMID 10473485 | url=http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/319/7210/630}}
* {{cite journal | author=Pickering T, James G, Boddie C, Harshfield G, Blank S, Laragh J | title=How common is white coat hypertension? | journal=JAMA | volume=259 | issue=2 | pages=225-8 | year=1988 | id=PMID 3336140}}
* {{cite journal | author=Pierdomenico S, Mezzetti A, Lapenna D, Guglielmi M, Mancini M, Salvatore L, Antidormi T, Costantini F, Cuccurullo F | title='White-coat' hypertension in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension: evaluation of prevalence by ambulatory monitoring and impact on cost of health care. | journal=Eur Heart J | volume=16 | issue=5 | pages=692-7 | year=1995 | id=PMID 7588903}}
* {{cite journal | author=McGrath B | title=Is white-coat hypertension innocent? | journal=Lancet | volume=348 | issue=9028 | pages=630 | year=1996 | id=PMID 8782749}} - commenatry on:<br>{{cite journal | author=Glen S, Elliott H, Curzio J, Lees K, Reid J | title=White-coat hypertension as a cause of cardiovascular dysfunction. | journal=Lancet | volume=348 | issue=9028 | pages=654-7 | year=1996 | id=PMID 8782756}}
* {{cite journal | author=Gosse P, Promax H, Durandet P, Clementy J | title='White coat' hypertension. No harm for the heart. | journal=Hypertension | volume=22 | issue=5 | pages=766-70 | year=1993 | id=PMID 8225536}}


==External links==
[[Category:Hypertension]]
*[http://www.my-blood-pressure.com/home-monitoring.html BP Home Monitoring]
 
*[http://www.blood-pressure-monitoring.org/white-coat-hypertension.htm White Coat Effect]
[[ca:Efecte « bata blanca »]]
[[de:Weißkittelhypertonie]]
[[es:Hipertensión de bata blanca]]
[[fr:Effet « blouse blanche »]]
[[hi:ह्वाईट कोट हाईपरटेंशन]]
[[he:תסמונת החלוק הלבן]]
[[ja:白衣高血圧]]
[[pl:Efekt białego fartucha]]
[[ru:Гипертензия белых халатов]]
[[zh:白大衣高血壓]]


[[Category: Cardiology]]
[[Category: Cardiology]]
[[Category: Up-To-Date]]
[[Category: Up-To-Date]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date Cardiology]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date Cardiology]]
[[de:Weißkittelhypertonie]]
[[fr:Effet « blouse blanche »]]
[[he:תסמונת החלוק הלבן]]
[[zh:白大褂高血压]]


{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}

Revision as of 22:38, 1 November 2011

White coat hypertension
DiseasesDB 14138

WikiDoc Resources for White coat hypertension

Articles

Most recent articles on White coat hypertension

Most cited articles on White coat hypertension

Review articles on White coat hypertension

Articles on White coat hypertension in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on White coat hypertension

Images of White coat hypertension

Photos of White coat hypertension

Podcasts & MP3s on White coat hypertension

Videos on White coat hypertension

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on White coat hypertension

Bandolier on White coat hypertension

TRIP on White coat hypertension

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on White coat hypertension at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on White coat hypertension

Clinical Trials on White coat hypertension at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on White coat hypertension

NICE Guidance on White coat hypertension

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on White coat hypertension

CDC on White coat hypertension

Books

Books on White coat hypertension

News

White coat hypertension in the news

Be alerted to news on White coat hypertension

News trends on White coat hypertension

Commentary

Blogs on White coat hypertension

Definitions

Definitions of White coat hypertension

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on White coat hypertension

Discussion groups on White coat hypertension

Patient Handouts on White coat hypertension

Directions to Hospitals Treating White coat hypertension

Risk calculators and risk factors for White coat hypertension

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of White coat hypertension

Causes & Risk Factors for White coat hypertension

Diagnostic studies for White coat hypertension

Treatment of White coat hypertension

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on White coat hypertension

International

White coat hypertension en Espanol

White coat hypertension en Francais

Business

White coat hypertension in the Marketplace

Patents on White coat hypertension

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to White coat hypertension

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

White coat hypertension, more commonly known as white coat syndrome, is a phenomenon in which patients exhibit elevated blood pressure in a clinical setting but not in other settings.[1] It is believed that this is due to the anxiety some people experience during a clinic visit.[2]

As the notion of "normal" is subjective and changes from individual to individual a reference measurement was necessary. As night-time and self measured values are often not subject to daily stress and clinical values are subject to unusual anxiety, daytime ambulatory blood pressure is used as a reference as it takes into account daily stress but not in excess. Due to specificity involved in diagnosis of white coat hypertension, many problems have been incurred in its diagnosis and treatment.

The term "masked hypertension" can be used to describe the contrasting phenomenon, where blood pressure is elevated during daily living, but not in an office setting.[3]

Diagnosis

In studies, white coat hypertension can be defined as the presence of a defined hypertensive average blood pressure in an office setting but not at home.[4]

Diagnosis is made difficult as a result of the unreliable measures taken from the conventional methods of detection. These methods often involve an interface with health care professionals and frequently results are tarnished by a list of factors including variability in the individual’s blood pressure, technical inaccuracies, anxiety of the patient,[5] recent ingestion of pressor substances, and talking, amongst many other factors. The most common measure of blood pressure is taken from a noninvasive instrument called a sphygmomanometer. "A survey showed that 96% of primary care physicians habitually use a cuff size too small,"[6] adding to the difficulty in making an informed diagnosis. For such reasons, white coat hypertension cannot be diagnosed with a standard clinical visit. It can be reduced (but not eliminated) with automated blood pressure measurements over 15 to 20 minutes in a quiet part of the office or clinic.[7]

Patients with white coat hypertension do not exhibit the signs indicative of trepidation and their increased blood pressure is often not accompanied by tachycardia.[8] This is supported by studies that repeatedly indicate that 15%–30% of those thought to have mild hypertension as a result of clinic or office recordings display normal blood pressure and no unusual response to pressure stimulus. These persons did not show any specific characteristics such as age that may be indicative of a higher susceptibility to white coat hypertension.[9]

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and patient self-measurement using a home blood pressure monitoring device is being increasingly used to differentiate those with white coat hypertension or experiencing the white coat effect from those with chronic hypertension. This does not mean that these methods are without fault. Daytime ambulatory values, despite taking into account stresses of everyday life when taken during the patient's daily routine, are still susceptible to the effects of daily variables such as physical activity, stress and duration of sleep. Ambulatory monitoring has been found to be the more practical and reliable method in detecting patients with white coat hypertension and for the prediction of target organ damage. Even as such, the diagnosis and treatment of white coat hypertension remains controversial.

Recent studies showed that home blood pressure monitoring is as accurate as a 24-hour ambulatory monitoring in determining blood pressure levels.[10] Researchers at the University of Turku, Finland studied 98 patients with untreated hypertension. They compared patients using a home blood pressure device and those wearing a 24-hour ambulatory monitor. Researcher Dr. Niiranen said that "home blood pressure measurement can be used effectively for guiding anti-hypertensive treatment". Dr. Stergiou added that home tracking of blood pressure "is more convenient and also less costly than ambulatory monitoring."

Use of breathing patterns has been proposed as a technique for identifying white coat hypertension.[11]

In one Turkish study of 438 consecutive patients, 38% were normotensive, 43% had white coat hypertension, 2% had masked hypertension, and 15% had sustained hypertension. Even patients taking medication for sustained hypertension who are normotensive at home may exhibit white coat hypertension in the office setting.[12]

Implications for treatment

In general, individuals with white coat hypertension have lower morbidity than patients with sustained hypertension, but higher morbidity than the clinically normotensive.[13]

However, it should be remembered that all the established published trials on the consequences of high blood pressure and the benefits of treating are based on one-time measurement in clinical settings rather than the generally slightly lower readings obtained from ambulatory recordings.

The debate and conflicting ideas revolve around whether or not it would be feasible to treat white coat hypertension, as there still is no conclusive evidence that a temporary rise in blood pressure during office visits has an adverse effect on health.

In fact, many cross sectional studies have shown that "target-organ damage (as exemplified by left ventricular hypertrophy) is less in white-coat hypertensive [patients] than in sustained hypertensive [patients] even after the allowance has been made for differences in clinic pressure".[6] Many believe that patients with "white coat" hypertension do not require even very small doses of antihypertensive therapy as it may result in hypotension, but must still be careful as patients may show signs of vascular changes and may eventually develop hypertension.

See also

References

  1. "Hypertension: Overview - eMedicine".
  2. Swan, Norman (20 June 2010). Health Minutes - Hypertension. Retrieved 27 August 2010.
  3. Pickering TG, Eguchi K, Kario K (2007). "Masked hypertension: a review" (– Scholar search). Hypertens. Res. 30 (6): 479–88. doi:10.1291/hypres.30.479. PMID 17664850. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)[dead link]
  4. Ruxer J, Mozdzan M, Baranski M, Wozniak-Sosnowska U, Markuszewski L (2007). ""White coat hypertension" in type 2 diabetic patients". Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 117 (10): 452–6. PMID 18320786. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. Jhalani, Juhee a; Goyal, Tanya a; Clemow, Lynn a; Schwartz, Joseph E. b; Pickering, Thomas G. a; Gerin, William a (2005). "Anxiety and outcome expectations predict the white-coat effect". 10 (6). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.: pp317–319. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  6. 6.0 6.1 Pickering T (1994). "Blood pressure measurement and detection of hypertension". Lancet. 344 (8914): 31–5. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91053-7. PMID 7912303.
  7. Pickering, TG; Hall, JE; Appel, LJ; et al. (2005). "Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research". Hypertension. 45 (5): 142–61. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000150859.47929.8e. PMID 15611362. Retrieved 2009-10-01. See p. 146, Masked Hypertension or Isolated Ambulatory Hypertension.
  8. Pickering T, James G, Boddie C, Harshfield G, Blank S, Laragh J (1988). "How common is white coat hypertension?". JAMA. 259 (2): 225–8. doi:10.1001/jama.259.2.225. PMID 3336140.
  9. McGrath B (1996). "Is white-coat hypertension innocent?". Lancet. 348 (9028): 630. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65069-6. PMID 8782749. - commenatry on:
    Glen S, Elliott H, Curzio J, Lees K, Reid J (1996). "White-coat hypertension as a cause of cardiovascular dysfunction". Lancet. 348 (9028): 654–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02303-3. PMID 8782756.
  10. Niiranen TJ, Kantola IM, Vesalainen R, Johansson J, Ruuska MJ (2006). "A comparison of home measurement and ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure in the adjustment of antihypertensive treatment". Am. J. Hypertens. 19 (5): 468–74. doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.017. PMID 16647616. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  11. Thalenberg JM, Póvoa RM, Bombig MT, de Sá GA, Atallah AN, Luna Filho B (2008). "Slow breathing test increases the suspicion of white-coat hypertension in the office". Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 91 (4): 243–9, 267–73. PMID 19009177. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. Helvaci MR, Seyhanli M (2006). "What a high prevalence of white coat hypertension in society!" (– Scholar search). Intern. Med. 45 (10): 671–4. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1650. PMID 16778338.[dead link]
  13. Khan TV, Khan SS, Akhondi A, Khan TW (2007). "White coat hypertension: relevance to clinical and emergency medical services personnel". MedGenMed. 9 (1): 52. PMC 1924974. PMID 17435652.

Faculty Of Medicine : White Coat Syndrome Template:Vascular diseases

ca:Efecte « bata blanca » de:Weißkittelhypertonie hi:ह्वाईट कोट हाईपरटेंशन he:תסמונת החלוק הלבן


Template:WikiDoc Sources