Pulmonary embolism landmark trials: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "{{Pulmonary embolism}} {{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor-In-Chief''': Ujjwal Rastogi, MBBS [mailto:urastogi@perfuse.org] ==Landmark Clinical Trials== ==R..." |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Landmark Clinical Trials== | ==Landmark Clinical Trials== | ||
===Studies depicting the efficacy of Ventilation-Perfusion scan versus pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of PE=== | |||
1. PIOPED (Prospective Investigation in Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis) study compares lung scans and pulmonary arteriography (1989). | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 15:12, 10 January 2012
|
Pulmonary Embolism Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Pulmonary Embolism Assessment of Probability of Subsequent VTE and Risk Scores |
|
Treatment |
|
Follow-Up |
|
Special Scenario |
|
Trials |
|
Case Studies |
|
Pulmonary embolism landmark trials On the Web |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Pulmonary embolism landmark trials |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Pulmonary embolism landmark trials |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Ujjwal Rastogi, MBBS [2]
Landmark Clinical Trials
Studies depicting the efficacy of Ventilation-Perfusion scan versus pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of PE
1. PIOPED (Prospective Investigation in Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis) study compares lung scans and pulmonary arteriography (1989).