Congestive heart failure anticoagulants: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Varun Kumar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Varun Kumar (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
3. Patient is not on [[warfarin]] or [[dabigatran]] | 3. Patient is not on [[warfarin]] or [[dabigatran]] | ||
===Background=== | |||
*In patients at relatively low risk for [[stroke]] ([[CHADS2 score]] 0 or 1), [[aspirin]] is a reasonable alternative to [[warfarin]], given its more benign side effect profile and relative convenience to use, although warfarin or [[dabigatran]] reduce stroke risk more than does aspirin at all CHADS2 scores. | |||
*The higher the risk for stroke in [[atrial fibrillation]], the greater the absolute benefit from warfarin (target [[INR]] 2.0-3.0) compared to aspirin (325 mg daily) therapy. | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 03:42, 4 April 2012
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Indications for Warfarin or Dabigatran
A patient with congestive heart failure should be anticoagulated if:
1. Atrial fibrillation is present
and
2. The CHADS2 Score is > 2
Background
- Although aspirin provides some protection from stroke in atrial fibrillation, warfarin provides significantly more protection, albeit with a higher risk of bleeding.[1]
- The higher the risk for stroke in atrial fibrillation, the greater the absolute benefit from warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) compared to aspirin (325 mg daily) therapy.
- In the RELY[2] Trial dabigatran at a dose 150mg BID was shown to be superior to warfarin in stroke prevention and can be used for patient in whom the INR is difficult to monitor, however it is currently brand-name only so discussion of cost should be undertaken with the patient.
- The annual incidence of systemic and pulmonary embolism in patients with heart failure is 2-5%. This is not that dissimilar from the risk of severe bleeding among patients to its anticoagulants which is 0.8-2.5% per year.
- As a result anticoagulation is not routinely recommended in the current guidelines for the treatment of heart failure. However among those patients with a atrial fibrillation, a history of emboli, or multiple intracardiac thrombi, or akinesis or dyskinesis detected on echo should be anticoagulated.
- While hospitalized, patients with CHF should receive DVT prophylaxis
Indications for Aspirin
A patient with congestive heart failure should be anticoagulated if:
1. Atrial fibrillation is present
and
2. The CHADS2 Score is 0 or 1
and
3. Patient is not on warfarin or dabigatran
Background
- In patients at relatively low risk for stroke (CHADS2 score 0 or 1), aspirin is a reasonable alternative to warfarin, given its more benign side effect profile and relative convenience to use, although warfarin or dabigatran reduce stroke risk more than does aspirin at all CHADS2 scores.
- The higher the risk for stroke in atrial fibrillation, the greater the absolute benefit from warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) compared to aspirin (325 mg daily) therapy.
References
- ↑ "Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study". Lancet. 343 (8899): 687–91. 1994. PMID 7907677. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help);|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ↑ Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L (2009). "Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation". The New England Journal of Medicine. 361 (12): 1139–51. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0905561. PMID 19717844. Retrieved 2012-04-03. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help)