Neurocardiogenic syncope pacemaker therapy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
2. Permanent [[pacemaker|pacing]] is not indicated for situational vasovagal [[syncope]] in which avoidance behavior is effective and preferred. ''(Level of Evidence: C)''}} | 2. Permanent [[pacemaker|pacing]] is not indicated for situational vasovagal [[syncope]] in which avoidance behavior is effective and preferred. ''(Level of Evidence: C)''}} | ||
==Sources== | |||
* The ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities <ref name="Epstein"> Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NAM III, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices). Circulation. 2008; 117: 2820–2840. PMID 18483207 </ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
{{WH}} | |||
{{WS}} |
Revision as of 00:22, 17 May 2012
Neurocardiogenic Syncope Microchapters |
Differentiating Neurocardiogenic Syncope From Other Diseases |
---|
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Neurocardiogenic syncope pacemaker therapy On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Neurocardiogenic syncope pacemaker therapy |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Neurocardiogenic syncope pacemaker therapy |
ACC / AHA Guidelines- Permanent Pacing in Hypersensitive Carotid Sinus Syndrome and Neurocardiogenic Syncope (DO NOT EDIT) [1]
“ |
Class I1. Permanent pacing is indicated for recurrent syncope caused by spontaneously occurring carotid sinus stimulation and carotid sinus pressure that induces ventricular asystole of more than 3 seconds. (Level of Evidence: C) Class IIa1. Permanent pacing is reasonable for syncope without clear, provocative events and with a hypersensitive cardioinhibitory response of 3 seconds or longer. (Level of Evidence: C) Class IIb1. Permanent pacing may be considered for significantly symptomatic neurocardiogenic syncope associated with bradycardia documented spontaneously or at the time of tilt-table testing. (Level of Evidence: B) Class III1. Permanent pacing is not indicated for a hypersensitive cardioinhibitory response to carotid sinus stimulation without symptoms or with vague symptoms. (Level of Evidence: C) 2. Permanent pacing is not indicated for situational vasovagal syncope in which avoidance behavior is effective and preferred. (Level of Evidence: C) |
” |
Sources
- The ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities [1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NAM III, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices). Circulation. 2008; 117: 2820–2840. PMID 18483207