Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and demographics: Difference between revisions
Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus}} {{CMG}} == Overview == == Epidemiology and Demographics == [[Image:MRSA statistics.jpg|left|thumb|400px|Methicilli..." |
|||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
CDC welcomes the increased attention and dialogue on the important problem of MRSA in healthcare. CDC, state and local health departments and partners nationwide are collaborating to prevent MRSA infections in healthcare settings. For example, CDC | CDC welcomes the increased attention and dialogue on the important problem of MRSA in healthcare. CDC, state and local health departments and partners nationwide are collaborating to prevent MRSA infections in healthcare settings. For example, CDC | ||
* | * Monitors trends in infections and MRSA through surveillance systems such as the National Healthcare Safety Network, formerly the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System and the Dialysis Surveillance Network to identify which patients are at highest risk and where prevention efforts should be targeted. | ||
* | * Works with multiple prevention partners including state health departments, academic medical centers, and regional and national collaboratives to identify and promote effective strategies to prevent MRSA transmission. | ||
* | * Developed an overarching strategy to help guide healthcare facilities to control antibiotic resistance called The Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthcare Settings. This campaign includes specific strategies for various healthcare populations, including hospitalized adults and children, dialysis patients, surgical patients, and long-term care patients. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 19:04, 12 August 2012
|
Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infections Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and demographics On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and demographics |
|
FDA on Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and demographics |
|
CDC on Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and demographics |
|
Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and demographics in the news |
|
Blogs on Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and demographics |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Epidemiology and Demographics
Worldwide, an estimated 2 billion people carry some form of S. aureus; of these, up to 53 million (2.7% of carriers) are thought to carry MRSA. In the United States, 95 million carry S. aureus in their noses; of these 2.5 million (2.6% of carriers) carry MRSA. A population review conducted in 3 communities in the US showed the annual incidence of CA-MRSA during 2001–2002 to be 18–25.7/100,000 ; most CA-MRSA isolates were associated with clinically relevant infections, and 23% of patients required hospitalization.
Because cystic fibrosis patients are often treated with multiple antibiotics in hospital settings, they are often colonised with MRSA, potentially increasing the rate of life-threatening MRSA pneumonia in this group. The risk of cross-colonisation has led to increased use of isolation protocols among these patients. In a hospital setting, patients who have received fluoroquinolones are more likely to become colonised with MRSA, this is probably because many circulating strains of MRSA are fluoroquinolone-resistant, which means that MRSA is able to colonise patients whose normal skin flora have been cleared of non-resistant S. aureus by fluoroquinolones.
In the USA, reports have been increasing of outbreaks of MRSA colonisation and infection through skin contact in locker rooms and gymnasiums, even among healthy populations. MRSA also is becoming a problem in paediatrics, including hospital nurseries. A 2007 study found that 4.6% of patients in US healthcare facilities were infected or colonized with MRSA.
MRSA causes as many as 20% of Staphylococcus aureus infections in populations that use intravenous drugs. These out-of-hospital strains of MRSA, now designated as community-acquired, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or CA-MRSA, are more easily treated than hospital-acquired MRSA (although more virulent than MSSA). CA-MRSA apparently did not evolve de novo in the community, but represents a hybrid between MRSA which escaped from the hospital environment and the once easily treatable community organisms. Most of the hybrid strains also acquired a virulence factor which makes their infections invade more aggressively, resulting in deep tissue infections following minor scrapes and cuts, and many cases of fatal pneumonia as well.
As of early 2005, the number of deaths in the United Kingdom attributed to MRSA has been estimated by various sources to lie in the area of 3000 per year. Staphylococcus bacteria account for almost half of all UK hospital infections. The issue of MRSA infections in hospitals has recently been a major political issue in the UK, playing a significant role in the debates over health policy in the United Kingdom general election held in 2005.
During the summer of 2005, researchers in The Netherlands discovered that three pig farmers or their families were infected by MRSA bacteria that were also found on their pigs. Researchers from Radboud University Nijmegen are now investigating how widespread the MRSA bacteria is in pigs, and whether it will become characterised among the zoonoses.
Recently, it has been observed that MRSA can replicate inside of Acanthamoeba, increasing MRSA numbers 1000-fold. Since Acanthamoeba can form cysts easily picked up by air currents, these organisms can spread MRSA via airborne routes. Whether control of Acanthamoeba in the clinical environment will also help to control MRSA, remains an area for research.
Strains
In the UK, the most common strains are EMRSA15 and EMRSA16.[45] EMRSA16 is the best described epidemiologically: it originated in Kettering, England, and the full genomic sequence of this strain has been published. This has been recognised as being identical to the ST36:USA200 strain which circulates in the USA, and carries the SCCmec type II, enterotoxin A and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 genes. Under the new international typing system, this strain is now called MRSA252 and the entire genome sequence of this strain has been published. It is not entirely certain why this strain has become so successful, whereas previous strains have failed to persist: one explanation is the characteristic pattern of antibiotic sensitivities. Both the EMRSA-15 and -16 strains are resistant to erythromycin and ciprofloxacin: It is known that Staphylococcus aureus can survive intracellularly, and these are precisely the antibiotics that best penetrate intracellularly: it may be that these strains of S. aureus are therefore able to exploit an intracellular niche.
In the USA, the epidemic of community-associated MRSA is due to a CC8 strain designated ST8:USA300, which carries mec type IV, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, and enterotoxins Q and K. Other community-associated strains of MRSA are ST8:USA500 and ST59:USA1000.
How MRSA Spreads in Healthcare Settings:
The main mode of transmission to other patients is through human hands, especially healthcare workers' hands. Hands may become contaminated with MRSA bacteria by contact with infected or colonized patients. If appropriate hand hygiene such as washing with soap and water or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer is not performed, the bacteria can be spread when the healthcare worker touches other patients.
MRSA: a Growing Problem in the Healthcare Setting, But One with a Cure
MRSA is becoming more prevalent in healthcare settings. According to CDC data, the proportion of infections that are antimicrobial resistant has been growing. In 1974, MRSA infections accounted for two percent of the total number of staph infections; in 1995 it was 22%; in 2004 it was some 63%.
The good news is that MRSA is preventable. The first step to prevent MRSA, is to prevent healthcare infections in general. Infection control guidelines produced by CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control and Prevention Advisory Committee (HICPAC) are central to the prevention and control of healthcare infections and ultimately, MRSA in healthcare settings. To learn more about infection control guidelines to prevent infections and MRSA go to http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp. CDC welcomes the increased attention and dialogue on the important problem of MRSA in healthcare. CDC, state and local health departments and partners nationwide are collaborating to prevent MRSA infections in healthcare settings. For example, CDC
- Monitors trends in infections and MRSA through surveillance systems such as the National Healthcare Safety Network, formerly the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System and the Dialysis Surveillance Network to identify which patients are at highest risk and where prevention efforts should be targeted.
- Works with multiple prevention partners including state health departments, academic medical centers, and regional and national collaboratives to identify and promote effective strategies to prevent MRSA transmission.
- Developed an overarching strategy to help guide healthcare facilities to control antibiotic resistance called The Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthcare Settings. This campaign includes specific strategies for various healthcare populations, including hospitalized adults and children, dialysis patients, surgical patients, and long-term care patients.