Radial catheterization pitfalls: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Varun Kumar (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-{{SIB}} +, -{{EH}} +, -{{EJ}} +, -{{Editor Help}} +, -{{Editor Join}} +)) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{CMG}} | {{CMG}} | ||
==Potential Pitfalls of the Radial Approach to Cardiac Catheterization== | ==Potential Pitfalls of the Radial Approach to Cardiac Catheterization== |
Revision as of 15:31, 20 August 2012
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Potential Pitfalls of the Radial Approach to Cardiac Catheterization
- Spasm
- Vessel tortuosity
- Guide catheter support and selection may be reduced
- Loss of radial artery pulse in 4% of cases
- Potential increase in the duration of the procedure and fluroscopy time
- The radial artery has been instrumented should there be a desire to use it as a conduit for CABG
- It is the second and not the first approach learned by trainees
- There is a learning curve in treating spasm, navigating anatomy, and manipulating catheters
- Anatomically there can be a loop in the artery near the brachial in about 10% of cases
- Smaller sheaths are required (4-8F)