Seizure laboratory findings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Seizure}} Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing. {{CMG}} ==Overview== ==L..." |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
==Laboratory Findings== | ==Laboratory Findings== | ||
===Serum prolactin level=== | |||
Two [[meta-analysis|meta-analyses]] have quantified the role of an elevated serum prolactin. | |||
The first meta-analysis found that<ref name="pmid14988379">{{cite journal |author=Ahmad S, Beckett MW |title=Value of serum prolactin in the management of syncope |journal=Emergency medicine journal : EMJ |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=e3 |year=2004 |pmid=14988379 |doi=}}</ref>: | |||
"If a serum prolactin concentration is greater than three times the baseline when taken within one hour of syncope, then in the absence of test "modifiers": | |||
# the patient is nine times more likely to have suffered a GTCS as compared with a pseudoseizure positive LR = 8.92 (95% CI (1.31 to 60.91)), SN = 0.62 (95% CI (0.40 to 0.83)), SP = 0.89 (95% CI (0.60 to 0.98)) | |||
# five times more likely to have suffered a GTCS as compared with non-convulsive syncope positive LR 4.60 (95% CI (1.25 to 16.90)), SN = 0.71 (95% CI (0.49 to 0.87)), SP = 0.85 (95% CI (0.55 to 0.98)). " | |||
The second meta-analysis found:<ref name="pmid16157897">{{cite journal |author=Chen DK, So YT, Fisher RS |title=Use of serum prolactin in diagnosing epileptic seizures: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology |journal=Neurology |volume=65 |issue=5 |pages=668-75 |year=2005 |pmid=16157897 |doi=10.1212/01.wnl.0000178391.96957.d0}}</ref> | |||
#"Elevated serum prolactin assay, when measured in the appropriate clinical setting at 10 to 20 minutes after a suspected event, is a useful adjunct for the differentiation of generalized tonic-clonic or complex partial seizure from psychogenic nonepileptic seizure among adults and older children (Level B)." | |||
#"Serum prolactin assay does not distinguish epileptic seizures from syncope (Level B). | |||
#"The use of serum PRL assay has not been established in the evaluation of status" epilepticus, repetitive seizures, and neonatal seizures (Level U)." | |||
The serum prolactin level is less [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitive]] for detecting partial seizures.<ref name="pmid15256189">{{cite journal |author=Shukla G, Bhatia M, Vivekanandhan S, ''et al'' |title=Serum prolactin levels for differentiation of nonepileptic versus true seizures: limited utility |journal=Epilepsy & behavior : E&B |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=517-21 |year=2004 |pmid=15256189 |doi=10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.03.004}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 15:47, 29 August 2012
|
Seizure Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Seizure laboratory findings On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Seizure laboratory findings |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Seizure laboratory findings |
Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Laboratory Findings
Serum prolactin level
Two meta-analyses have quantified the role of an elevated serum prolactin. The first meta-analysis found that[1]: "If a serum prolactin concentration is greater than three times the baseline when taken within one hour of syncope, then in the absence of test "modifiers":
- the patient is nine times more likely to have suffered a GTCS as compared with a pseudoseizure positive LR = 8.92 (95% CI (1.31 to 60.91)), SN = 0.62 (95% CI (0.40 to 0.83)), SP = 0.89 (95% CI (0.60 to 0.98))
- five times more likely to have suffered a GTCS as compared with non-convulsive syncope positive LR 4.60 (95% CI (1.25 to 16.90)), SN = 0.71 (95% CI (0.49 to 0.87)), SP = 0.85 (95% CI (0.55 to 0.98)). "
The second meta-analysis found:[2]
- "Elevated serum prolactin assay, when measured in the appropriate clinical setting at 10 to 20 minutes after a suspected event, is a useful adjunct for the differentiation of generalized tonic-clonic or complex partial seizure from psychogenic nonepileptic seizure among adults and older children (Level B)."
- "Serum prolactin assay does not distinguish epileptic seizures from syncope (Level B).
- "The use of serum PRL assay has not been established in the evaluation of status" epilepticus, repetitive seizures, and neonatal seizures (Level U)."
The serum prolactin level is less sensitive for detecting partial seizures.[3]
References
- ↑ Ahmad S, Beckett MW (2004). "Value of serum prolactin in the management of syncope". Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 21 (2): e3. PMID 14988379.
- ↑ Chen DK, So YT, Fisher RS (2005). "Use of serum prolactin in diagnosing epileptic seizures: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology". Neurology. 65 (5): 668–75. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000178391.96957.d0. PMID 16157897.
- ↑ Shukla G, Bhatia M, Vivekanandhan S; et al. (2004). "Serum prolactin levels for differentiation of nonepileptic versus true seizures: limited utility". Epilepsy & behavior : E&B. 5 (4): 517–21. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.03.004. PMID 15256189.