Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia other imaging findings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:48, 26 September 2012

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X - Ray

ECG

Cardiac MRI

Echocardiogram

Other Imaging Findings

Endomyocardial biopsy

Atuopsy

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Future or Investigational Therapies

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia other imaging findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia other imaging findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia other imaging findings

CDC on Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia other imaging findings

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia other imaging findings in the news

Blogs onArrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia other imaging findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia other imaging findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Right ventricular angiography is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of ARVD. Findings consistent with ARVD are an akinetic or dyskinetic bulging localized to the infundibular, apical, and subtricuspid regions of the RV. The specificity is 90%; however, the test is observer dependent.

References

Template:WH Template:WS