Zygomycosis diagnostic criteria: Difference between revisions
Rim Halaby (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rim Halaby (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Zygomycosis}} | {{Zygomycosis}} | ||
{{CMG}} | {{CMG}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Line 12: | Line 10: | ||
Diagnosis for phycomycosis is through a [[biopsy]] or [[microbiological culture|culture]], although an [[ELISA]] test has been developed for ''Pythium insidiosum'' in animals.<ref name=Hensel>{{cite journal |author=Hensel P, Greene C, Medleau L, Latimer K, Mendoza L |title=Immunotherapy for treatment of multicentric cutaneous pythiosis in a dog |journal=J Am Vet Med Assoc |volume=223 |issue=2 |pages=215-8, 197 |year=2003 |id=PMID 12875449}}</ref> | Diagnosis for phycomycosis is through a [[biopsy]] or [[microbiological culture|culture]], although an [[ELISA]] test has been developed for ''Pythium insidiosum'' in animals.<ref name=Hensel>{{cite journal |author=Hensel P, Greene C, Medleau L, Latimer K, Mendoza L |title=Immunotherapy for treatment of multicentric cutaneous pythiosis in a dog |journal=J Am Vet Med Assoc |volume=223 |issue=2 |pages=215-8, 197 |year=2003 |id=PMID 12875449}}</ref> | ||
As [[swab]]s of tissue or discharge are generally unreliable, the diagnosis of mucormycosis tends to be established by a [[biopsy]] specimen of the involved tissue. Computerised imaging techniques such as [[MRI]]s, [[CT scan]]s and [[X-ray]]s may be useful in the diagnosis of specific areas. | As [[swab]]s of tissue or discharge are generally unreliable, the diagnosis of mucormycosis tends to be established by a [[biopsy]] specimen of the involved tissue. Computerised imaging techniques such as [[MRI]]s, [[CT scan]]s and [[X-ray]]s may be useful in the diagnosis of specific areas. | ||
Diagnosis for basidiobolomycosis is by laboratory culture of the organism, usually from pieces of tissue taken from the patient. It grows easily on most media, but risks being discarded as irrelevant or being reported as a contaminant because laboratory staff are unfamiliar with it. | Diagnosis for basidiobolomycosis is by laboratory culture of the organism, usually from pieces of tissue taken from the patient. It grows easily on most media, but risks being discarded as irrelevant or being reported as a contaminant because laboratory staff are unfamiliar with it. |
Revision as of 20:28, 3 October 2012
Zygomycosis Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Zygomycosis diagnostic criteria On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Zygomycosis diagnostic criteria |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Zygomycosis diagnostic criteria |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Diagnostic Criteria
Diagnosis for phycomycosis is through a biopsy or culture, although an ELISA test has been developed for Pythium insidiosum in animals.[1] As swabs of tissue or discharge are generally unreliable, the diagnosis of mucormycosis tends to be established by a biopsy specimen of the involved tissue. Computerised imaging techniques such as MRIs, CT scans and X-rays may be useful in the diagnosis of specific areas.
Diagnosis for basidiobolomycosis is by laboratory culture of the organism, usually from pieces of tissue taken from the patient. It grows easily on most media, but risks being discarded as irrelevant or being reported as a contaminant because laboratory staff are unfamiliar with it.
Diagnosis is often difficult because basidiobolomycosis is a rare disease and therefore often not recognised. The lesions often look like tumours rather than infection, so often no sample is sent for microbiology, however, the histopathology is characteristic: the Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon describes the presence of fungal hyphae (which may exist only as ghosts on the slide) surrounded by eosinophilic material.
References
- ↑ Hensel P, Greene C, Medleau L, Latimer K, Mendoza L (2003). "Immunotherapy for treatment of multicentric cutaneous pythiosis in a dog". J Am Vet Med Assoc. 223 (2): 215–8, 197. PMID 12875449.