Hookworm infection laboratory findings: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Where concentration procedures are not available, a direct wet mount examination of the specimen is adequate for detecting moderate to heavy infections. For quantitative assessments of infection, various methods such as the Kato-Katz can be used. | Where concentration procedures are not available, a direct wet mount examination of the specimen is adequate for detecting moderate to heavy infections. For quantitative assessments of infection, various methods such as the Kato-Katz can be used. | ||
[[Image:Hookworm.jpg|left|Image:Hookworm.jpg|]] | |||
'''(A)''' and '''(B)''': Hookworm eggs examined on wet mount (eggs of ''Ancylostoma duodenale'' and ''Necator americanus'' cannot be distinguished morphologically). | '''(A)''' and '''(B)''': Hookworm eggs examined on wet mount (eggs of ''Ancylostoma duodenale'' and ''Necator americanus'' cannot be distinguished morphologically). | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Examination of the eggs cannot distinguish between ''N. americanus'' and ''A. duodenale''. Larvae can be used to differentiate between ''N. americanus'' and ''A. duodenale'', by rearing filariform larvae in a fecal smear on a moist filter paper strip for 5 to 7 days (Harada-Mori). Occasionally, it may be necessary to distinguish between the rhabditiform larvae (L2) of hookworms and those of ''Strongyloides stercoralis''. | Examination of the eggs cannot distinguish between ''N. americanus'' and ''A. duodenale''. Larvae can be used to differentiate between ''N. americanus'' and ''A. duodenale'', by rearing filariform larvae in a fecal smear on a moist filter paper strip for 5 to 7 days (Harada-Mori). Occasionally, it may be necessary to distinguish between the rhabditiform larvae (L2) of hookworms and those of ''Strongyloides stercoralis''. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 15:50, 7 December 2012
|
Hookworm infection Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Hookworm infection laboratory findings On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Hookworm infection laboratory findings |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Hookworm infection laboratory findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Laboratory Findings
Microscopy
Microscopic identification of eggs in the stool is the most common method for diagnosing hookworm infection. The recommended procedure is as follows:
- Collect a stool specimen.
- Fix the specimen in 10% formalin.
- Concentrate using the formalin–ethyl acetate sedimentation technique.
- Examine a wet mount of the sediment.
Where concentration procedures are not available, a direct wet mount examination of the specimen is adequate for detecting moderate to heavy infections. For quantitative assessments of infection, various methods such as the Kato-Katz can be used.
(A) and (B): Hookworm eggs examined on wet mount (eggs of Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus cannot be distinguished morphologically).
Diagnostic characteristics:
- Size 57 to 76 µm by 35 to 47 µm
- Oval or ellipsoidal shape
- Thin shell
The embryo in (B) has begun cellular division and is at an early (gastrula) developmental stage.
Examination of the eggs cannot distinguish between N. americanus and A. duodenale. Larvae can be used to differentiate between N. americanus and A. duodenale, by rearing filariform larvae in a fecal smear on a moist filter paper strip for 5 to 7 days (Harada-Mori). Occasionally, it may be necessary to distinguish between the rhabditiform larvae (L2) of hookworms and those of Strongyloides stercoralis.