Atrial septal defect CT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Atrial septal defect}} | {{Atrial septal defect}} | ||
{{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief:''' [[Priyamvada Singh|Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:psingh13579@gmail.com]; {{CZ}}; '''Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief:''' [[Kristin Feeney|Kristin Feeney, B.S.]] [mailto:kfeeney@elon.edu] | {{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief:''' [[Priyamvada Singh|Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:psingh13579@gmail.com]; {{CZ}}; '''Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief:''' [[Kristin Feeney|Kristin Feeney, B.S.]] [mailto:kfeeney@elon.edu] | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
[[Computed tomography]] can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the [[echocardiographic]] findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining [[shunt]] volume and pressure differences. | [[Computed tomography]] can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the [[echocardiographic]] findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining [[shunt]] volume and pressure differences. | ||
==CT== | ==CT== | ||
===Advantages=== | ===Advantages=== | ||
Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
* Avoids the need for [[general anesthesia]] in children. | * Avoids the need for [[general anesthesia]] in children. | ||
* Can identify associated [[heart]] anomalies.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | * Can identify associated [[heart]] anomalies.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | ||
===Disadvantages=== | ===Disadvantages=== | ||
* Costly. | * Costly. | ||
Line 19: | Line 16: | ||
* Not a modality for detecting or quantify a defect.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | * Not a modality for detecting or quantify a defect.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | ||
* Not a modality for quantifying shunt volume and pressure differences.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite journal| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | * Not a modality for quantifying shunt volume and pressure differences.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite journal| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} |
Revision as of 20:35, 8 January 2013
Atrial Septal Defect Microchapters | |
Treatment | |
---|---|
Surgery | |
| |
Special Scenarios | |
Case Studies | |
Atrial septal defect CT On the Web | |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Atrial septal defect CT | |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Atrial septal defect CT | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [2]; Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [4]
Overview
Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining shunt volume and pressure differences.
CT
Advantages
- Provides additional anatomic details compared to echocardiography.
- Helps in visualization of the aberrant pulmonary venous return (seen in sinus venosus defect). [1]
- Done faster compared to MRI.
- Avoids the need for general anesthesia in children.
- Can identify associated heart anomalies.[1]
Disadvantages
- Costly.
- Radiation can have long terms side-effect on growing children.
- Not a modality for detecting or quantify a defect.[1]
- Not a modality for quantifying shunt volume and pressure differences.[1]