Cutaneous abscess surgery: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Abscess}} {{CMG}} ==Overview== Wound abscesses do not generally need to be treated with antibiotics, but they will require surgical intervention, debridement and...") |
(→Primary closure: Updated text from CZ) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
===Primary closure=== | ===Primary closure=== | ||
In anorectal abscesses, primary closure healed faster, but 25% of abscesses healed by secondary healing and recurrence was higher.<ref name="pmid6397949">{{cite journal |author=Kronborg O, Olsen H |title=Incision and drainage v. incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover in anorectal abscess. A randomized study with 3-year follow-up |journal=Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica |volume=150 |issue=8 |pages=689-92 |year=1984 |pmid=6397949 |doi=}}</ref> | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ [[Randomized controlled trial]]s of primary closure.<ref name="pmid6805714">{{cite journal |author=Simms MH, Curran F, Johnson RA, ''et al'' |title=Treatment of acute abscesses in the casualty department |journal=British medical journal (Clinical research ed.) |volume=284 |issue=6332 |pages=1827-9 |year=1982 |pmid=6805714 |doi=}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="pmid3881155">{{cite journal |author=Stewart MP, Laing MR, Krukowski ZH |title=Treatment of acute abscesses by incision, curettage and primary suture without antibiotics: a controlled clinical trial |journal=The British journal of surgery |volume=72 |issue=1 |pages=66-7 |year=1985 |pmid=3881155 |doi=}}</ref> <ref name="pmid9137156">{{cite journal |author=Abraham N, Doudle M, Carson P |title=Open versus closed surgical treatment of abscesses: a controlled clinical trial |journal=The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery |volume=67 |issue=4 |pages=173-6 |year=1997 |pmid=9137156 |doi=}}</ref> <ref name="Singer">Singer et al. (2013)Primary Versus Secondary Closure of Cutaneous Abscesses in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med{{doi|10.1111/acem.12053}}</ref> | |||
! rowspan="2"|Trial!!rowspan="2"| Patients!!rowspan="2"| Intervention!!rowspan="2"|Comparison !!rowspan="2"|Outcome!!colspan="2"|Results!!rowspan="2"|Comment | |||
|-<br/> | |||
! Intervention!!Control | |||
|- | |||
| Simms<ref name="pmid6805714"/><br/>1982|| 114 patients|| Primary closure|| || Various outcomes|| || || Primary closure delayed healing by one day | |||
|- | |||
| Stewart<ref name="pmid3881155"/><br/>1985|| 137 patients<br/>• All abscesses were drained, [[curettage|curetted]], and irrigated|| Primary closure|| || Various outcomes|| || || Primary closure significantly better | |||
|- | |||
| Abraham<ref name="pmid9137156"/><br/>1997 ||61 patients<br/>• "Abscesses requiring drainage under a general anaesthetic"<br/>• All abscesses were drained, [[curettage|curetted]], and irrigated|| Primary closure with interrupted vertical mattress skin sutures with/without closed suction drainage|| Packing||• Healing at one week<br/>• Healing at one month|| || ||Primary closure significantly better at one week; no difference at one month. | |||
|- | |||
| Singer<ref name="Singer"/><br/>2013|| 56 patients|| Primary closure with vertical mattress sutures||Packing|| Failure to health at one week|| 30%|| 29%||Primary closure significantly better | |||
|- | |||
| || || || || || || || | |||
|} | |||
In anorectal abscesses, primary closure healed faster, but 25% of abscesses healed by secondary healing and recurrence was higher.<ref name="pmid6397949">{{cite journal |author=Kronborg O, Olsen H |title=Incision and drainage v. incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover in anorectal abscess. A randomized study with 3-year follow-up |journal=Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica |volume=150 |issue=8 |pages=689-92 |year=1984 |pmid=6397949 |doi=}}</ref> | |||
===Perianal abscess=== | ===Perianal abscess=== | ||
Revision as of 15:40, 23 February 2013
|
Abscess Main page |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Wound abscesses do not generally need to be treated with antibiotics, but they will require surgical intervention, debridement and curretage.[1]
Surgery
Incision and drainage
The abscess should be inspected to identify if foreign objects are a cause, requiring surgical removal. If foreign objects are not the cause, a doctor will incise and drain the abscess and prescribe painkillers and possibly antibiotics.
Surgical drainage of the abscess (e.g. lancing) is usually indicated once the abscess has developed from a harder serous inflammation to a softer pus stage. This is expressed in the Latin medical aphorism Ubi pus, ibi evacua.
In critical areas where surgery presents a high risk, surgery may be delayed or used as a last resort. The drainage of a lung abscess may be performed by positioning the patient in a way that enables the contents to be discharged via the respiratory tract. Warm compresses and elevation of the limb may be beneficial for skin abscess.
Primary closure
| Trial | Patients | Intervention | Comparison | Outcome | Results | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | ||||||
| Simms[2] 1982 |
114 patients | Primary closure | Various outcomes | Primary closure delayed healing by one day | |||
| Stewart[3] 1985 |
137 patients • All abscesses were drained, curetted, and irrigated |
Primary closure | Various outcomes | Primary closure significantly better | |||
| Abraham[4] 1997 |
61 patients • "Abscesses requiring drainage under a general anaesthetic" • All abscesses were drained, curetted, and irrigated |
Primary closure with interrupted vertical mattress skin sutures with/without closed suction drainage | Packing | • Healing at one week • Healing at one month |
Primary closure significantly better at one week; no difference at one month. | ||
| Singer[5] 2013 |
56 patients | Primary closure with vertical mattress sutures | Packing | Failure to health at one week | 30% | 29% | Primary closure significantly better |
In anorectal abscesses, primary closure healed faster, but 25% of abscesses healed by secondary healing and recurrence was higher.[6]
Perianal abscess
Perianal abscesses can be seen in patients with for example inflammatory bowel disease (such as Crohn's disease) or diabetes. Often the abscess will start as an internal wound caused by ulceration or hard stool. This wound typically becomes infected as a result of the normal presence of feces in the rectal area, and then develops into an abscess. This often presents itself as a lump of tissue near the anus which grows larger and more painful with the passage of time.
Like other abscesses, perianal abscesses may require prompt medical treatment, such as an incision and debridement or lancing.
References
- ↑ McLatchie G, Leaper D, (eds). 2007. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Surgery, 2nd ed. Oxford. OUP
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Simms MH, Curran F, Johnson RA; et al. (1982). "Treatment of acute abscesses in the casualty department". British medical journal (Clinical research ed.). 284 (6332): 1827–9. PMID 6805714.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Stewart MP, Laing MR, Krukowski ZH (1985). "Treatment of acute abscesses by incision, curettage and primary suture without antibiotics: a controlled clinical trial". The British journal of surgery. 72 (1): 66–7. PMID 3881155.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Abraham N, Doudle M, Carson P (1997). "Open versus closed surgical treatment of abscesses: a controlled clinical trial". The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery. 67 (4): 173–6. PMID 9137156.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Singer et al. (2013)Primary Versus Secondary Closure of Cutaneous Abscesses in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Meddoi:10.1111/acem.12053
- ↑ Kronborg O, Olsen H (1984). "Incision and drainage v. incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover in anorectal abscess. A randomized study with 3-year follow-up". Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica. 150 (8): 689–92. PMID 6397949.