Wilms' tumor natural history, complications and prognosis
Wilms' tumor Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Wilms' tumor natural history, complications and prognosis On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Wilms' tumor natural history, complications and prognosis |
FDA on Wilms' tumor natural history, complications and prognosis |
CDC on Wilms' tumor natural history, complications and prognosis |
Wilms' tumor natural history, complications and prognosis in the news |
Blogs on Wilms' tumor natural history, complications and prognosis |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Wilms' tumor natural history, complications and prognosis |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Natural History
Complications
- The tumor may become quite large, but usually remains self-enclosed. Spread of the tumor to the lungs, liver, bone, or brain is the most worrisome complication.
- High blood pressure and kidney damage may occur as the result of the tumor or its treatment.
- Removal of Wilms tumor from both kidneys may affect kidney function.
Prognosis
The prognosis for patients with Wilms tumor depends on the following:
- Stage of disease at diagnosis.
- Tumor size.
- Histopathologic features of the tumor (FH vs. anaplastic histology). (Refer to the Histologic Findings in Wilms Tumor section of this summary for more information.)
- Molecular features of the tumor. B7-H1, an immune costimulatory molecule, has been found to be associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence in favorable histology Wilms tumor.
- Patient age (adolescents and young adults).
Children with Wilms tumor
Wilms tumor is a curable disease in most affected children. Since the 1980s, the 5-year survival rate for Wilms tumor with FH has been consistently above 90%. This favorable outcome occurred despite reductions in the length of therapy, dose of radiation, extent of fields irradiated, and the percentage of patients receiving radiation therapy.
Adolescents and young adults with Wilms tumor
In an analysis of Wilms tumor patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, adults (n = 152) had a statistically worse OS (69% vs. 88%, P < .001) than did pediatric patients (n = 2,190), despite previous studies showing comparable outcome with treatment on protocol. The inferior outcome of the adult patients on this study may be the result of differences in tumor biology between children and adults, incorrect diagnosis, inadequate staging (e.g., more likely to be staged as localized disease or to not receive lymph node sampling), or undertreatment (e.g., not receiving radiation therapy). Additional factors in this SEER report that may have contributed to a worse OS in adult patients include the size of the study and lack of central review of pathology. Adolescent and young adult patients up to age 30 years are now eligible for treatment on the COG Wilms tumor protocols.
The inferior outcome of older patients is not explained entirely by inadequate treatment or not being treated according to the pediatric Wilms tumor protocol. In a U.K. study looking at the outcome of patients aged 10 to 16 years (N = 50) registered on the U.K. Wilms Tumor 3 and SIOP 2001 Wilms tumor trials, patients in this age group had a higher percentage of diffuse anaplastic tumors. The overall 5-year survival was 63% for patients aged 10 to 16 years (43% for anaplastic tumors), which is significantly lower than the outcome for younger patients with Wilms tumor. However, SEER 5-year relative survival of nephroblastoma between 2003 and 2009 did not show differences among age groups from younger than 1 year to age 10 to 14 years.