Mesothelioma pathophysiology
|
Mesothelioma Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Mesothelioma pathophysiology On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Mesothelioma pathophysiology |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Mesothelioma pathophysiology |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Parminder Dhingra, M.D. [2], Sujit Routray, M.D. [3]
Overview
Pathogenesis
- Asbestos causes DNA damage directly by mechanically interfering with the segregation of chromosomes during mitosis and indirectly by inducing mesothelial cells and macrophages, to release mutagenic reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.[1] Asbestos fibres have been shown to alter the function and secretory properties of macrophages, ultimately creating conditions which favor the development of mesothelioma. Following asbestos phagocytosis, macrophages generate increased amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which are normal by-products of cellular anaerobic metabolism. However, these free radicals are also known clastogenic and membrane-active agents thought to promote asbestos carcinogenicity. These oxidants can participate in the oncogenic process by directly and indirectly interacting with DNA, modifying membrane-associated cellular events, including oncogene activation and perturbation of cellular antioxidant defences.
- The mesothelium consists of a single layer of flattened to cuboidal cells forming the epithelial lining of the serous cavities of the body including the peritoneal, pericardial and pleural cavities. Deposition of asbestos fibres in the parenchyma of the lung may result in the penetration of the visceral pleura from where the fibre can then be carried to the pleural surface, thus leading to the development of malignant mesothelial plaques. The processes leading to the development of peritoneal mesothelioma remain unresolved, although it has been proposed that asbestos fibres from the lung are transported to the abdomen and associated organs via the lymphatic system. Additionally, asbestos fibres may be deposited in the gut after ingestion of sputum contaminated with asbestos fibres.
- Asbestos also may possess immunosuppressive properties. For example, chrysotile fibres have been shown to depress the in-vitro proliferation of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes, suppress natural killer cell lysis, and significantly reduce lymphokine-activated killer cell viability and recovery. Furthermore, genetic alterations in asbestos-activated macrophages may result in the release of potent mesothelial cell mitogens such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) which in turn, may induce the chronic stimulation and proliferation of mesothelial cells after injury by asbestos fibres.
Genetics
- Development of mesothelioma is the result of multiple genetic mutations.
- Genes involved in the pathogenesis of mesothelioma include:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
- Asbestos has also been shown to mediate the entry of foreign DNA into target cells. Incorporation of this foreign DNA may lead to mutations and oncogenesis, by several possible mechanisms:
- Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes
- Activation of oncogenes
- Activation of proto-oncogenes due to incorporation of foreign DNA containing a promoter region
- Activation of DNA repair enzymes, which may be prone to error
- Activation of telomerase
- Prevention of apoptosis
Immunohistochemistry
- The cytological and histological diagnosis can be difficult, with mesothelial hyperplasia and metastatic adenocarcinoma appearing similar. Specific markers may be helpful in the diagnosis of mesothelioma.[8]
- Mesothelioma is demonstrated by positivity to tumor markers, such as:[8][9]
- Calretinin
- Epithelial membrane antigen
- Cytokeratin
- Mesothelin
- WT1
- Podoplanin
- Osteopontin
- HBME-1
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Thomas, Anish; Chen, Yuanbin; Yu, Tinghui; Gill, Ammara; Prasad, Vinay (2015). "Distinctive clinical characteristics of malignant mesothelioma in young patients". Oncotarget. 6 (18): 16766–16773. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4414. ISSN 1949-2553.
- ↑ Ladanyi M (2005). "Implications of P16/CDKN2A deletion in pleural mesotheliomas". Lung Cancer. 49 Suppl 1: S95–8. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.03.017. PMID 15950811.
- ↑ Kumar-Singh S, Segers K, Rodeck U, Backhovens H, Bogers J, Weyler J; et al. (1997). "WT1 mutation in malignant mesothelioma and WT1 immunoreactivity in relation to p53 and growth factor receptor expression, cell-type transition, and prognosis". J Pathol. 181 (1): 67–74. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199701)181:1<67::AID-PATH723>3.0.CO;2-Z. PMID 9072005.
- ↑ Ladanyi M, Zauderer MG, Krug LM, Ito T, McMillan R, Bott M; et al. (2012). "New strategies in pleural mesothelioma: BAP1 and NF2 as novel targets for therapeutic development and risk assessment". Clin Cancer Res. 18 (17): 4485–90. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2375. PMC 3432735. PMID 22825583.
- ↑ Andujar P, Pairon JC, Renier A, Descatha A, Hysi I, Abd-Alsamad I; et al. (2013). "Differential mutation profiles and similar intronic TP53 polymorphisms in asbestos-related lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma". Mutagenesis. 28 (3): 323–31. doi:10.1093/mutage/get008. PMID 23435014.
- ↑ Opitz I, Soltermann A, Abaecherli M, Hinterberger M, Probst-Hensch N, Stahel R; et al. (2008). "PTEN expression is a strong predictor of survival in mesothelioma patients". Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 33 (3): 502–6. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.09.045. PMID 18248818.
- ↑ Murakami H, Mizuno T, Taniguchi T, Fujii M, Ishiguro F, Fukui T; et al. (2011). "LATS2 is a tumor suppressor gene of malignant mesothelioma". Cancer Res. 71 (3): 873–83. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2164. PMID 21245096.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Pathology of mesothelioma. Dr Bruno Di Muzio and A.Prof Frank Gaillard et al. Radiopaedia 2016. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/mesothelioma. Accessed on February 10, 2016
- ↑ Immunohistochemistry of mesothelioma. Wikipedia 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesothelioma. Accessed on February 12, 2016