Sandbox adult CHD complications

Template:Cardiogenic Shock - 2017 Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1],Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Arzu Kalayci, M.D. [2]

==AHA SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT - 2017== AHA

Diagnosis and Management of Noncardiac Complications in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Advantages and Disadvantages of Imaging Modalities for Detection of Liver Disease and Screening for HCC in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease(CHD)

	Advantages	Disadvantages	Additional Notes
Ultrasound	Inexpensive Widely available Highly sensitive for differentiating cystic and solid lesions No ionising radiation	Low sensitivity for detecting focal, solid liver lesions, particularly in the setting of diffuse disease Often unable to detect lesions <1 cm in size Low specs city High operator dependency	Use of contrast agents may improve characterization of hepatic tutors Useful for guiding liver parenchymal and some focal mass biopsies Elastography may overestimate degree of brosis and may not be useful for screening in CHD
CT	Best spatial resolution (submillimeter resolution)	Exposure to ionizing radiation dose Low sensitivity for detecting and characterizing lesions <1 cm in size Contrast contraindicated in renal failure Diffuse liver disease and fatty in ltration limit sensitivity for lesion detection	CT-guided liver mass biopsy useful in cases when ultrasound visualization is poor
MRI	High lesion-to-liver contrast High spatial resolution Better lesion detection and characterization than CT No ionising radiation Unenhanced MRI superior to unenhanced CT	Contrast relatively contraindicated in renal failure (eGFR <30 mL·min−1·1.73 m−2) High cost Long scan time Need for longer breath-holds Less widely available Unable to be used with many pacemakers and de brillators	Hepatobiliary contrast media useful in characterizing speci c liver tutors
CHD indicates congenital heart disease; CT, computed tomography; eGFR, estimated glomerular ltration rate; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; and MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.