Aspiration pneumonia surgery

Revision as of 17:45, 24 March 2018 by Medhat (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Aspiration pneumonia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Aspiration Pneumonia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Aspiration pneumonia surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Aspiration pneumonia surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Aspiration pneumonia surgery

CDC onAspiration pneumonia surgery

Aspiration pneumonia surgery in the news

Blogs on Aspiration pneumonia surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pneumonia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Aspiration pneumonia surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

Surgical intervention is not recommended for the management of [disease name].

OR

Surgery is not the first-line treatment option for patients with [disease name]. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either [indication 1], [indication 2], and [indication 3]

OR

The mainstay of treatment for [disease name] is medical therapy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with either [indication 1], [indication 2], and/or [indication 3].

OR

The feasibility of surgery depends on the stage of [malignancy] at diagnosis.

OR

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for [disease or malignancy]

Surgery

Management of gastroesophageal reflux

Patients with swallowing dysfunction, especially those with neurologic impairment, may have increased frequency and volume of gastroesophageal reflux (GER).

Most patients with mild GER can be effectively managed without fundoplication, using dietary modification and positioning to reduce the frequency of GER, pharmacotherapy for acid suppression, and occasionally prokinetic agents.

Fundoplication

Fundoplication is a surgical procedure to reduce the risk of GER. It should be considered only in patients with GER that is strongly suspected to be contributing to pulmonary disease. When evaluating the severity of GER, a gastroenterologist classically focuses on the percent of time that gastric contents spend in the esophagus, which correlate with the risk for peptic esophagitis. From a pulmonary point of view, the number and duration of episodes may be less important than whether the reflux occurs during sleep, when the patient is horizontal and less likely to protect the larynx. Clinical judgment must be applied to individual patients when judging whether they are likely to benefit from fundoplication. Complications after fundoplication include retching, esophageal obstruction, intrathoracic herniation, and recurrence of GER due to breakdown of the wrap. Complications of fundoplication are most common in patients with neurologic impairment [42,43]. Failure rates (variously defined) of antireflux surgery range from 2 to 50 percent and are generally higher in children with neurological impairment [44].

Jejunal feeds

For patients with GER who are dependent on enteral feeds, an alternate strategy to reduce GER and the associated risks of aspiration is to place the feeding tube in the jejunum rather than in the stomach; this tends to reduce but not eliminate GER. Disadvantages of jejunal feeds include intolerance of rapid feeding infusions (such that continuous rather than bolus feeds must be used), and a tendency for accidental displacement (except with permanent, surgically placed jejunal tubes). A retrospective study in a group of children with neurological impairment found that the rates of aspiration pneumonia and mortality were similar among those treated with jejunal feeding as compared with those treated with fundoplication. [45]

References

Template:WH Template:WS