Tooth impaction
WikiDoc Resources for Tooth impaction |
Articles |
---|
Most recent articles on Tooth impaction Most cited articles on Tooth impaction |
Media |
Powerpoint slides on Tooth impaction |
Evidence Based Medicine |
Clinical Trials |
Ongoing Trials on Tooth impaction at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Tooth impaction Clinical Trials on Tooth impaction at Google
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt |
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Tooth impaction NICE Guidance on Tooth impaction
|
Books |
News |
Commentary |
Definitions |
Patient Resources / Community |
Patient resources on Tooth impaction Discussion groups on Tooth impaction Patient Handouts on Tooth impaction Directions to Hospitals Treating Tooth impaction Risk calculators and risk factors for Tooth impaction
|
Healthcare Provider Resources |
Causes & Risk Factors for Tooth impaction |
Continuing Medical Education (CME) |
International |
|
Business |
Experimental / Informatics |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jaspinder Kaur, MBBS[2]
Synonyms and keywords:
Overview
Impacted and embedded teeth are the two main types of unerupted teeth found in the mouth, and can sometimes be confused with each other. In both cases, the teeth remain below the surface of the gum, rather than erupting into an exposed position within the mouth, but the reason for the failure to erupt differs. Impacted teeth result from a situation in which an unerupted tooth is wedged against another tooth or teeth or otherwise located so that it cannot erupt normally. In contrast, an embedded tooth is an unerupted tooth that is covered, usually completely, with bone. That is to say, something that is physically blocking the pathway of eruption (such as another tooth) is the case for an impacted tooth, whereas the lack of eruptive force results in an embedded tooth.
Mandibular third molars are the most commonly found unerupted teeth, while maxillary third molars are second most common.
Historical Perspective
Classification
- Tooth impaction is classified based on various factors which are elaborated in following tables:
Table 1: Winter’s and Pell & Gregory’s criteria
Classification | Clinical description | Type |
---|---|---|
Pell and Gregory classification | Impaction depth: the relation of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of the third molar with the bone level is graded |
|
Pell and Gregory classification | Ramus relationship: the position of the distal surface of the third molar crown in relation to the anterior border of the ascending ramus is categorized |
|
Winter’s classification | Impaction angulation: the angle between the longitudinal axis of the second and third molars (which was measured by an orthodontic protractor) is categorized |
|
Nature of overlying tissue | This system is used by most dental insurance companies and one by which surgeon charges for his services. |
|
Pathophysiology
Causes of Tooth Impaction
Differentiating Tooth Impaction from other Diseases
Table 2: Enlist the differential diagnosis for tooth impaction
System involved | Causative factors |
---|---|
Cleidocranial dysostosis | Text |
Gardners syndrome | Text |
Gorlin–Sedano syndrome | Text |
Yunis–Varon Syndrome | Text |
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural history, Complications, and Prognosis
Diagnosis
Staging | History & Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Tests | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
References