HIV resistance testing
|
AIDS Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
HIV resistance testing On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of HIV resistance testing |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for HIV resistance testing |
Overview
The emergence of resistance to one or more antiretroviral drugs is one of the more common reasons for therapeutic failure in the treatment of HIV. In addition, the emergence of resistance to one antiretroviral drug sometimes confers a reduction in or a loss of susceptibility to other or all drugs of the same class. The application of laboratory technologies, such as gene amplification, automated nucleic acid sequencing, and nucleic acid hybridization, and the availability of recombinant viruses for testing phenotypic susceptibility have permitted advances in HIV resistance testing. Many clinicians and investigators are currently using these technologies in the clinical management of HIV.
Advantage
Despite limitations of resistance assays and their interpretation, several randomized controlled studies have demonstrated that virologic outcome, at least over the short term, may be improved when genotypic or phenotypic data are used to guide choice of drug regimens in patients with loss of virologic response to prior regimens.[1][2]
FDA recommendation for Resistance testing
The FDA recommends that characterization of resistance and cross-resistance be a part of antiretroviral drug development so that clinically relevant information is available at the time of approval.
Limitations
- Performance characteristics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility) for many of the assays in investigational use have not been fully established.
- The clinical significance of many mutations or mutational patterns has not been defined completely for many antiretroviral drugs.
- The quantitative relationship between reductions of cell culture susceptibility and loss of clinical activity has not been established for most drugs.
Genotypic testing
Underlying Concept
Drug-resistance mutations have been well known and characterized from patient specimens and in vitro work. Rapid detection of probable resitance mutation to different ART can be detected by amplification and sequencing.
Process
- Mutations responsible for reductions in susceptibility to a drug can be identified by DNA sequence analysis of the relevant portions of the virus genome.
- The complete coding sequence of the gene for the target protein should be determined in the early stages of characterization of mutations associated with reduced drug susceptibility.
- Once mutations are identified, their ability to confer phenotypic resistance should be evaluated in a recombinant virus system (e.g., by using site-directed mutagenesis or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of relevant portions of the virus genome to introduce these mutations into a standard laboratory HIV genetic background) or other suitable system, such that the mutations necessary to reproduce the resistant phenotype are identified.
- If site-directed mutagenesis experiments within the target gene fail to recapitulate the resistance phenotype, then the potential effects of mutations elsewhere in the viral genome should be examined.
- In the case of studying mutations in the envelope gene, which is highly variable, a possible option is to introduce mutations into the parental envelope to assess their contribution to the resistance phenotype.
- Recombinant virus should then be tested for drug susceptibility in cell culture. Shifts in drug susceptibility (fold- increases in EC50 value) for recombinant virus relative to WT should be determined.
Limitations
- Low viral load
- It not only decreases the sensitivity of the test but also make this test redundant.
- Low-level resistance can be lost in the mixed population of viral pseudospecies, which often exists in HIV infected persons.
Phenotypic testing
Underlying Concept
It also test the virus’s ability to replicate in the presence of antiretroviral drugs.
Limitations
- Low viral load limits the test.
- It is a very labor intensive process.
Advantages
It is better than genotypic testing at detecting mixed populations of resistant and sensitive pseudospecies.
Reference
- ↑ Baxter JD, Mayers DL, Wentworth DN, Neaton JD, Hoover ML, Winters MA, Mannheimer SB, Thompson MA, Abrams DI, Brizz BJ, Ioannidis JP, Merigan TC (2000). "A randomized study of antiretroviral management based on plasma genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in patients failing therapy. CPCRA 046 Study Team for the Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS". AIDS. 14 (9): F83–93. PMID 10894268. Retrieved 2012-05-30. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Cohen CJ, Hunt S, Sension M, Farthing C, Conant M, Jacobson S, Nadler J, Verbiest W, Hertogs K, Ames M, Rinehart AR, Graham NM (2002). "A randomized trial assessing the impact of phenotypic resistance testing on antiretroviral therapy". AIDS. 16 (4): 579–88. PMID 11873001. Retrieved 2012-05-30. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)