Delirium primary prevention

Revision as of 01:35, 17 February 2014 by Pratik Bahekar (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Delirium Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Delirium from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

CT

MRI

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case #1

Delirium On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Delirium

All Images
X-rays
Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Delirium

CDC on Delirium

Delirium in the news

Blogs on Delirium

Directions to Hospitals Treating Delirium

Risk calculators and risk factors for Delirium

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vishal Khurana, M.B.B.S., M.D. [2]

Overview

Primary Prevention

Delirium is more likely to be missed in the ICU. Physician detection rate is poor, reported sensitivity is 29%.

Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA) recommends daily monitoring of delirium in ICU patients to improve early diagnosis and treatment.

the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) showed highest sensitivity in a research setting, ranging from 64% to 97%. 9,12 However, in routine, daily practice the sensitivity of the CAM-ICU appeared to be much lower (47%).


CAM-ICU are that it cannot quantify delirium severity and that it assesses delirium at a certain moment in time, 12 whereas delirium may fluctuate considerably over the day. 1 These factors impede recognition and thereby delay treatment. Delayed treatment of delirium was found to be related to mortality. 14 Therefore, an objective detection tool for continuous monitoring of delirium is needed

[1]


that the most successful approach to delirium prevention is to attenuate modifiable risk factors in individual patients. This requires a complex intervention, and studies investigating such interventions in medical patients and those who have had hip fracture have reported significant reductions (of about a third) in incidence of delirium and/or reduced severity and duration of delirium. ustained adherence to the clinical protocol is a key factor for successful delirium prevention. 22 The effective Yale delirium prevention model of care 19 has been translated into routine practice as the hospital elder life program (HELP). 23 This programme is now used in three countries and is associated with a reduction in the rates and costs of delirium. w33 Effective strategies for delirium prevention include orienting communication, therapeutic activities, early mobilisation and walking, non-pharmacological approaches to sleep and anxiety, maintaining nutrition and hydration, adaptive equipment for vision and hearing impairment, and pain management. Hospitals have several inherent risks for the development of delirium 2 and early discharge to a home rehabilitation service was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of delirium[2]


References

  1. "What are the opportunities f... [J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI".
  2. "Delirium in elderly people. [Lancet. 2013] - PubMed - NCBI". Text " accessdate " ignored (help)

Template:WH Template:WS