Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cyclosporiasis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Cyclosporiasis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X-Ray

CT Scan

MRI

Ultrasound

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

on Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Cyclosporiasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Cyclosporiasis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Alejandro Lemor, M.D. [2]

Overview

Laboratory Findings

  • Cyclospora infection is diagnosed by examining stool specimens.
  • Laboratory testing for cyclospora is not routinely done in most U.S. laboratories, even when stool is tested for parasites. Therefore, if indicated, health care providers should specifically request testing for cyclospora.
  • Laboratory diagnosis can be difficult as the cyclospora oocysts may not be detected in stool, even if the patient is symptomatic.
  • Therefore, patients might need to submit several specimens collected on different days.
  • Special techniques, such as acid-fast staining, are often used to make cyclospora oocysts more visible under the microscope.
  • In addition, cyclospora oocysts are autofluorescent, meaning that when stool containing the parasite is viewed under an ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence microscope the parasite appears blue or green against a black background.
  • Molecular diagnostic methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, are used to look for the parasite's DNA in the stool.[1]

Stool Examination

Wet Mount

  • In bright-field microscopy using differential interference contrast (DIC), oocysts appear as refractile spheres (8 to 10 μm) with a distinct oocyst wall, but may be confused with other objects. Under UV fluorescence microscopy, the oocyst wall autofluoresces.
  • An intense blue fluorescence is obtained with the preferred UV excitation filter set (330 to 365 nm).
  • If this filter set is not available, a less intense green fluorescence can be obtained with blue excitation (450 to 490 nm).
  • A fluorescence microscope is required and this procedure does not provide a stained slide that can be archived.
  • Both DIC and UV fluorescence microscopy are efficient and reliable approaches for identification of cyclospora.

Shown below are images of oocysts of cyclospora in an unstained wet mount.

Oocyst of C. cayetanensis in an unstained wet mount. Image courtesy of the Oregon State Public Health Laboratory
Oocyst of C. cayetanensis in an unstained wet mount. Image courtesy of the Oregon State Public Health Laboratory.
Oocyst of C. cayetanensis in an unstained wet mount of stool. Image taken at 1000x magnification. Image courtesy of CDC.

Modified Acid Fast Stain

  • A blue-green background, or contrasting counterstain, of fecal debris allows the oocysts to stand out.
  • The oocysts are variably stained: some will stain light pink to deep purple, while others may be unstained.
  • The oocysts (8 to 10 μm) may not be perfectly round; some may appear collapsed or distorted on one side.
  • They may contain granules and/or have a wrinkled oocyst wall appearance (characteristics that distinguish oocysts from acid-fast artifacts).
  • This staining method is the easiest and most practical, and provides a stained slide that can be archived.
  • The variability in staining and confusion with artifacts is a cause of misdiagnosing this infection.

Shown below are images of oocysts of cyclospora stained with modified acid fast stain.

Image obtained from CDC [2]
Image obtained from CDC [2]
File:Acid fats stain 3.jpg
Image obtained from CDC [2]

Safranin Stain

  • In the safranin stain, cylcospora ocysts stain uniformly, red to reddish-orange.
  • This uniform staining decreases the risk of misdiagnosis.
  • This technique requires heating, therefore additional equipment is necessary.

Shown below are images of oocysts of cyclospora stained with safranin stain.

Image obtained from CDC [2]
Image obtained from CDC [2]
Image obtained from CDC [2]

Trichrome Stain

  • Oocysts may be detected, but should not be confirmed, by this method.
  • Trichrome stain is the routine staining technique for stool specimens in most laboratories and laboratorians should be familiar with the appearance of cyclospora stained with trichrome in order to detect oocysts during routine examinations.
  • This staining method is inadequate for definitive diagnosis because all oocysts will appear unstained.
  • Oocysts appear as clear, round, wrinkled spheres, that measure between 8 to 10 μm.

Polymerase Chain Reaction

Molecular diagnostic methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, are used to look for the parasite's DNA in the stool.[3]

References

Template:WH Template:WS