Brain abscess differential diagnosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Brain abscess Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Brain abscess differential diagnosis On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Brain abscess differential diagnosis |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Brain abscess differential diagnosis |
Overview
Brain abscess must be differentiated from metastatic tumors, necrotic tumors, and lymphomas.[1][2]
Differential Diagnosis
Brain abscess must be differentiated from:
- Metastatic tumors
- Necrotic tumors
- Lymphomas
Despite these differences, the true diagnosis is sometimes not made until biopsy.
Metastatic Tumor
- The big differential is metastatic tumor: abscesses are often located in watershed regions, and tumors often enhance diffusely with contrast.
Necrotic Tumor
- Diagnosis of brain abscesses and necrotic tumors is often impossible without conventional MR imaging.[1]
- Several studies demonstrate the utility of Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate between necrotic or cystic lesions and brain abscesses.[3]
- DWI has a sensitivity and specificity of over 90% for distinguishing abscess (low ADC) from necrotic tumors (high ADC).
Lymphoma
- Some studies suggest that indium scans can help differentiate abscess from CA, and thallium SPECT scans can distinguish CNS toxoplasmosis from lymphoma.[2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Desprechins B, Stadnik T, Koerts G, Shabana W, Breucq C, Osteaux M (1999). "Use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differential diagnosis between intracerebral necrotic tumors and cerebral abscesses". AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 20 (7): 1252–7. PMID 10472982.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Ruiz A, Ganz WI, Post MJ, Camp A, Landy H, Mallin W; et al. (1994). "Use of thallium-201 brain SPECT to differentiate cerebral lymphoma from toxoplasma encephalitis in AIDS patients". AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 15 (10): 1885–94. PMID 7863938.
- ↑ Bavelloni A, Piazzi M, Raffini M, Faenza I, Blalock WL (2015). "Prohibitin 2: At a communications crossroads". IUBMB Life. 67 (4): 239–54. doi:10.1002/iub.1366. PMID 25904163.