Gynecomastia has been classified by various systems mainly based on surgical management, the severity of gynecomastia, physical appearance, and etiology.
GRADE 1: Minimal excess skin and fat, minimal alteration of nipple-areola complex (NAC), inframammary fold (IMF)
1a: No lateral skin roll
1b: Lateral skin roll
2: NAC and IMF below the ideal IMF, lateral chest roll, minimal upper abdominal laxity
GRADE 3: NAC and IMF below the ideal IMF, lateral chest roll, significant upper abdominal laxity
Barros's
2012
Physical
GRADE I: Increased diameter and slight protrusion limited to the areola region
GRADE II: Moderate hypertrophy of the breast with the nipple-areola complex (NAC) above the inframammary fold (IMF)
GRADE III: Major hypertrophy of the breast with glandularptosis and the NAC situated at the same height as or as much as 1 cm below the inframammary fold (IM)
Grade IV: Major breasthypertrophy with skin redundancy, severe ptosis, and the NAC positioned ≥1 cm below the inframammary fold (IMF)
GRADE I: Increase in diameter and protrusion limited to the areolar region
GRADE II: Hypertrophy of all the structural components of the breast; the NAC is above the IMF
GRADE III: Hypertrophy of all the structural components, NAC at the same height as or approximately 1 cm below the IMF; in this group we can also include male tuberous breast
GRADE IV: Hypertrophy of all the structural components, NAC >1 cm below the IMF
↑Wollina, U; Goldman, A (June 2011). "Minimally invasive esthetic procedures of the male breast". Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 10 (2): 150–155. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00548.x. PMID21649820.
↑Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973). "Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia". Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 51 (1): 48–52. PMID4687568.