Boerhaave syndrome diagnostic study of choice
Boerhaave syndrome Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Boerhaave syndrome diagnostic study of choice On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Boerhaave syndrome diagnostic study of choice |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Boerhaave syndrome diagnostic study of choice |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:
Overview
- Contrast Esophagram usually establishes the diagnosis of an esophageal perforation
- The location and
- Extent of perforation
- The accuracy of the test depends on
- The size and location of the perforation
- The technique used for the study.
- False-negative results occur in as many as 10 % of cases.
- Gastrografin a water-soluble contrast is used for the esophagram procedure.
- If the Gastrografin esophagram is inconclusive, a barium esophagram should be performed.
- Gastrografin is preferred over the barium esophagram to prevent barium induced inflammatory response in mediastinal or pleural cavities, whereas barium esophagram is very efficient in picking the small perforations.
- Barium esophagram can detect
- 60 percent of cervical perforations
- 90 percent of intrathoracic perforations.
Diagnostic Study of Choice
Study of choice:
- Contrast Esophagram usually establishes the diagnosis of an esophageal perforation[1][2][3][4][5]
- The location and
- Extent of perforation
- The accuracy of the test depends on
- The size and location of the perforation
- The technique used for the study.
- False-negative results occur in as many as 10 % of cases.
- Gastrografin a water-soluble contrast is used for the esophagram procedure.
- If the Gastrografin esophagram is inconclusive, a barium esophagram should be performed.
- Gastrografin is preferred over the barium esophagram to prevent barium induced inflammatory response in mediastinal or pleural cavities, whereas barium esophagram is very efficient in picking the small perforations.
- Barium esophagram can detect
- 60 percent of cervical perforations
- 90 percent of intrathoracic perforations.
References
- ↑ Bladergroen MR, Lowe JE, Postlethwait RW (1986). "Diagnosis and recommended management of esophageal perforation and rupture". Ann. Thorac. Surg. 42 (3): 235–9. PMID 3753071.
- ↑ Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Vlymen WJ (1982). "Appropriate contrast media for evaluation of esophageal disruption". Radiology. 144 (2): 439–41. doi:10.1148/radiology.144.2.7089304. PMID 7089304.
- ↑ James AE, Montali RJ, Chaffee V, Strecker EP, Vessal K (1975). "Barium or gastrografin: which contrast media for diagnosis of esophageal tears?". Gastroenterology. 68 (5 Pt 1): 1103–13. PMID 1126592.
- ↑ Schwartz SS (1975). "Letter: Barium or gastrografin: which contrast media for diagnosis of esophageal tears?". Gastroenterology. 69 (6): 1377. PMID 1193339.
- ↑ Vessal K, Montali RJ, Larson SM, Chaffee V, James AE (1975). "Evaluation of barium and gastrografin as contrast media for the diagnosis of esophageal ruptures or perforations". Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 123 (2): 307–19. PMID 1115308.